U2
Pop


3.5
great

Review

by lukass062 USER (1 Reviews)
November 30th, 2009 | 12 replies


Release Date: 1997 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Certainly not the best that U2 have come out with, but there is no denying this is a highly underrated and very much under-appreciated collection of enjoyable music.

The 90's marked a significant change in U2's musical style and direction. The album, POP is probably the most obvious examples of how the band experimented so much during that time. A lot of fans saw it as a lower point in their career. I, however saw it as a very interesting time for how the band played music. Although, POP is certainly not their best effort, it does pack in a few really good listens.

While many have missed the stadium rock anthems and albums of the 80's, the 90's brought so many new aspects to U2. With the industrial, electronic and alternative influences really shining through on the albums, Acthung Baby and Zooropa, POP took that extra small step into further experimentation of these musical styles and influences. For me, this was a very good thing. It gave U2 a sense of freedom in their music, like they didn't have to follow what everyone demanded of them. It was almost as if they were playing for themselves and no-one else, which isn't necessarily a bad thing.

What is most noticeable about POP is the production. The album sounds very new to U2, like nothing they have done before. Throughout the album we hear sampling, loops, programmed drum machines and sequencing among other things. Its something we've rarely (if ever) frequently heard from U2, so with the album being so constant with these production techniques, some fans might find it difficult to digest upon first listening.

The albums musical style is also another very noticeable aspect to POP which makes it stand out from the rest of U2's catalogue. With POP, they seemed to go one step further with the experimentation and reinvention of themselves. The electronic and techno influences are highly evident on the album with songs like 'Discotheque', 'Do You Feel Loved' and especially, 'Mofo' being almost danceable tunes and opening up the album with an onslaught of this unusual but great U2 sound. The album does stray into more 'classic' U2 ground however, which will be more than pleasing for older U2 fans. Songs like, 'If God Will Send His Angels', 'Last Night on Earth' and 'Gone' show that their rock roots and stadium anthems have not been completely forgotten, although there are no standout classics to be found here which stops POP from being an superb album.

POP seems to have quite an overall glum and dark tone which is displayed in many of the songs. This is particularly evident towards the end of the album with the very slow moving track, 'If You Wear That Velvet Dress'. the following track, 'Please' also seems to have a morbid quality to it and the closing track ends the album on a serious mood killer with, 'Wake up Dead Man'.
On a negative side, the album does seem to become less enjoyable because of the tedious change in tone and pace near the end. I do see a pattern in the songs i listen to on here. The first 7 being really great and the last 4/5 (which is a significant chunk) slipping into the dull side which the album is unfortunately let down by.

It seems that because, POP is a highly experimental album for U2 standards that it must be seen as a low point in their career just because it hasn't produced hit stadium rock anthems that we heard on the older more 'classic' U2 albums. I myself found it a very interesting listen and its always good to hear something new and fresh sounding from a band that has been around long enough to do it. They've already made history with their huge commercial success's in the past, so it should be no harm that they will want to discover new styles and paths into music. POP clearly shows this.
Overall, an interesting album which stands out because of its uniqueness in production and musical direction. Certainly not the best that U2 have come out with, but there is no denying this is a highly underrated and very much under-appreciated collection of enjoyable music.


user ratings (606)
2.9
good
other reviews of this album
DommeDamianII (4.5)
...

MasterSan (4)
Bursts out of the gate with some great tracks, loses steam, gets increasingly erratic, and stumbles ...

nisakss (4.5)
...



Comments:Add a Comment 
CelestialDust
December 1st 2009


3170 Comments


good job on your first review, I'd proofread it and fix up all those punctuation errors though

Parallels
December 1st 2009


10146 Comments


dissqoootheque!!
i need to order this from my local music retailer. they never have the 90's U2 stuff

RobotFrank
December 1st 2009


344 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Nice first review, but would be better served with proper comma placement. Quite a few misplaced, then they're missing in other required spots. If you want help, comment in my shoutbox. And welcome to Sputnik, keep at it!



I really like this album, it's one of my top 5 U2 albums. I WISH they kept going in this trajectory instead of chickening out and going backwards with everything that came out after this. I'm no longer a fan because of that.



I think you underrate the song Please. They really fixed it up by the time it became a single, its one of the best on the album, really.



Please Live, 1997 MTV VMAs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8m_vLZ3uc4

Inveigh
December 1st 2009


26878 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

^agreed RobotFrank -- this is my 5th favorite as well (behind War, Joshua Tree, Achtung Baby and Boy) and Please is easily my favorite song on this album. Maybe my favorite U2 song ever, actually. That live version is also amazing.



There was actually a live version that came on a DVD with their Best of 1990-2000 double disc that was from a Sarejavo benefit concert that was just incredible.



Good review man, especially for a first. Pos'd.

BigHans
December 1st 2009


30959 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

You gotta give it away....

BigHans
December 1st 2009


30959 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I always saw this album as half brilliant, half putrid. Mofo completely owns.

RobotFrank
December 1st 2009


344 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

That Sarejavo show was amazing, I def love that version of Please. I do feel he went a little too nutso in the end though - on the above version it's perfect. The slow Sunday Bloody Sunday was also really good from that Sarejavo gig.



I remember taping that show off the radio when it happened... I used to be a big fan growing up. Like I said, it all went to shit after POP.

Inveigh
December 1st 2009


26878 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I agree, POP is their last great album. I stopped caring after that.

kygermo
December 2nd 2009


1007 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Meh, Pop can be good at times. The first half is great, and then once Miami kicks in it almost becomes dismal (except for Please). U2 has never released a bad album (in my opinion) and this is no exception. I also feel U2 did this sort of sound much better with Zooropa.

lukass062
December 3rd 2009


1 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

thanks for the feedback ppl appreciate it :D

ksoflas
April 10th 2012


1430 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Pop should be included to the top 3 U2 albums!

Trully a masterpiece!!!



CelestialDust
April 10th 2012


3170 Comments


hmmmmm maybe I should pick this up... already heard like half the songs though



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy