Streetlight Manifesto
Keasbey Nights


3.0
good

Review

by LeMartien USER (2 Reviews)
September 29th, 2009 | 9 replies


Release Date: 2006 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Why, Tomas, why?!

I never quite understood the idea of remakes. Remember Gus Van Sant's 1998-version of Hitchcocks's Psycho? That was awful. Now Streetlight Manifesto's remake of Keasbey Nights may not be awful, but it was still a totally useless recording. Why? Because Catch 22's original version was nearly perfect; all of the numerous instruments were played very well, none of the songs had any unnecessary sections and then-18 year-old Tomas Kalnoky's vocals were flawless. Besides, he meant what he sang, which is a significant factor as many of the songs seem to be very personal.

So on the remake the instruments are played alright, but compared to the original clearly not as well. I could find so many examples, like the intros of the title-track and "This One Goes Out to...". I don't exactly know why, but they honestly do not sound as great. It's a little ironic as well since the Streetlight Manifesto line-up was supposed to have more experience and talent (the only things that could have possibly made the remake worthwhile). But wait a minute, I simply cannot manage to hear any evidence of that. And some of the subtleties that gleamed on the original, like the lovely bass solo on "Walking Away", are either missing or replaced by something far less appealing. Not to forget that Kalnoky's vocal performance is not as strong, as he sounds just dull compared to the original. Besides even the back-up vocals seem to be less dynamic. All this concludes to the lack of youth's charm and musical revolt that made the authentic version a perfect ska punk album. This damages especially songs like "Giving Up, Giving In" that are close to hardcore punk reminiscent of early Descendents albums. OK, maybe the remake had obviously a higher production quality, but the original's was sufficient, and it actually made the record more idyllic as it was a bit "lo-fi".

One more thing. The original was closed by devoting shout-outs of the band members, which was a unique and fun idea. That's replaced instead by a lame idea; Kalnoky's robotic text-to-speech voice "explaining" his decision to record this album. Still leaves me asking; was it just to avoid a "typical money-making re-release adding nothing but new cover art", or was it simply because he hated the fact that his own precious Keasbey Nights was credited to Catch 22, a band that had kicked him out and become a more or less terrible Pop-punk band playing his songs at their gigs.


user ratings (577)
3.8
excellent
other reviews of this album
Zesty Mordant (3.5)
...

danstalcup (4)
This remake is more technical but doesn't really capture the spirit of the original....



Comments:Add a Comment 
LeMartien
September 29th 2009


75 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

This looks shorter now than I expected, but I think everything essential that can be said about this remake is there. On the other hand the original deserves a detailed analysis describing the music/lyrics.

WeepingBanana
September 29th 2009


11387 Comments


i was gonna see these guys on saturday but i'm getting my wisdom teeth out... i'm so pissed.

anywho i would suggest you take out that final line of the review. kind of pointless.

LeMartien
September 29th 2009


75 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

OK, yeah I thought about it. Just wanted to make it absolutely clear that the original is a classic.



*fixed*

Lunarfall
September 29th 2009


3178 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Tomas wasnt kicked out of Catch 22, but otherwise good first review (that i really cant agree with at all).

LeMartien
September 29th 2009


75 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Tomas wasnt kicked out of Catch 22, but otherwise good first review (that i really cant agree with at all).


Are you sure? I've seen some sources claim he was actually kicked out. Doesn't seem right though since he was the frontman and the songwriter. I could change that though...



Well, could you explain why you'd disagree? Would be interesting to hear some arguments against my view...

thebhoy
September 30th 2009


4460 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

This is better then Catch because it has better musicians. But I don't like this anyways.

PanasonicYouth
September 30th 2009


7413 Comments


i think the reason for remaking this is perfectly valid
instead of letting victory re-release the original and sell the exact same thing again with new shiny cover art, why not re-record it and give fans more or less something new?

qwe3
September 30th 2009


21836 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

thats the thing, it's not really new, it's the same. yeah it's not the same band doing it, but come on. seems pretty useless to me.

LeMartien
September 30th 2009


75 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

why not re-record it and give fans more or less something new?


I don't think it was about pleasing fans at all... If they would have asked the general opinion of real fans, the outcome would have probably been against the remake. Many fans now claim to "hate" it aswell.

But I think what sums up my point is that there was barely anything to make better, so why even try?

Maybe at the end of the day it's just a matter of whether you're a technician or a purist. Then again, I can't see the remake being technically better either...



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy