Follow The White Rabbit
Follow The White Rabbit EP


3.0
good

Review

by GibTG USER (4 Reviews)
June 16th, 2009 | 15 replies


Release Date: 2008 | Tracklist

Review Summary: I highly recommend venturing down this rabbit hole.

A music enthusiast’s job is never done, constantly searching for bands that play your favorite style of music is an endless exercise that will lead you to every edge of the globe, and you’re bound to have some surprises along the way. One such surprise is a four-piece chaotic hardcore band from a fairly unlikely locale, that is Russia. A land where music didn’t exactly flourish under Communist rule and since has been most famous for the disgustingly pop band t.A.T.u has produced an experimental mathcore band in Follow The White Rabbit that seemingly has an infinite amount of potential and is currently creating some crazy-heavy dissonant metal that fans of extreme music should love.

The album contains six tracks clocking in at about twenty two minutes. Even in this small sample size the music does show a great deal of diversity. Some tracks feature distinct "plots" and climaxes where some stop and go in an instant. The music’s flow, or lack thereof in most cases may be a sign of the lack of cohesiveness in their short debut album, but the album’s more refined tracks are surely a sign of the band’s tremendous potential. The band's noted sounds include: some very interesting free-jazz breakdowns, appreciated vocal variance, and even occasionally spaced-out guitar work that doesn’t try to deafen you.

Vocals are what is to be expected from a heavily hardcore-influenced band. The majority of the vocals are gravely screams that infrequently let up. Other vocal styles would include death growls, a occasional vocal harmony, and electronically distorted vocals that help create a psychedelic affect, usually with the aid of electronic samples. The lyrics are vampish, raw, and powerful - as they should be. Lyrics are in a mixture of Russian and English but their content is nothing outstanding.

The guitar work is pretty darn impressive throughout, as it is highly technical and varies tremendously. Some of the slower work is refreshing and occasionally has a jazz feel as well. The sped-up sequences are damn fast, reminiscent of Chris Arp from PsyOpus flailing around the fret board. There is plenty of two-hand tapping and open, flail-away riffing so the sounds here will range from a wall of sound to an emergency broadcast system, even within the same track.

Bass tone does unfortunately go unnoticed at times, but a few of the breakdowns do a decent job of showing that it is still there. The bass lines here are also nothing spectacular, as they lack fills and are content with hiding behind some serious guitar shred. Similar to their tourmates PsyOpus, when the guitars sound like this the bass sometimes takes a backseat. Percussion is above average with its fair share of fills, rolls and an occasional blast beat. It succeeds in showcasing the band's rapidly-changing time signatures, and there is a fair share of rhythmically challenging beats.

Electronic samples and electronically-distorted vocals add another dimension of originality to music that usually takes heavily from their influences. The outros on “Joe Boxer Pt2” and “Lions” add a psychedelic side to the music as well, enhancing the label of "experimental" music.

Some of the band's riffing, vocals, breakdowns, and even percussion sounds very similar to that found in some works by The Dillinger Escape Plan, Coalesce, PsyOpus, and Converge but there is enough twists, turns, and unique material to keep the music mostly their own. There are few bands that can execute this challenging type of music this well - so it makes for an enjoyable listen regardless.


user ratings (21)
3.6
great

Comments:Add a Comment 
xequalscore
June 16th 2009


437 Comments


This sounds pretty good.

foreverendeared
June 16th 2009


14720 Comments


yeah this albums awesome. i lost it when my iPOD crashed though

GibTG
June 16th 2009


284 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

This is my first review and I feel as though I was a bit all over the place with my train of thought...



Any constructive criticism for my reviewing?

GibTG
June 16th 2009


284 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

By the way, Mr. White...



The album is still available to download directly from the band, just because your ipod crashed doesn't mean you need to lose it for good.

Willie
Moderator
June 16th 2009


20212 Comments


Constantly searching for bands that play your favorite style of music is an endless exercise that will lead you to every edge of the globe
Does a globe have edges? I understand that world isn't exactly round, but does a oval have edges?
This is my first review and I feel as though I was a bit all over the place with my train of thought...

Any constructive criticism for my reviewing?
ha ha, you already answered your own question - focus a bit more. The writing itself isn't bad.



GibTG
June 17th 2009


284 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

A geometric oval has no edges, but literature doesn't really compare to geometry...



It is a figure of speech, was it really that obnoxious?



Would you recommend breaking down the band's sound in a single paragraph? I feel as though I might have too many paragraphs.



Isn't first person perspective alright for a review?



How about using 'you,' this isn't really an essay so is it forbidden?



Sorry about all the questions, but I figured this is the best place to ask them - where I can learn before my next review.

GibTG
June 26th 2009


284 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Hopefully I'm not too bothersome but I would appreciate some more critiques for my first review.

zuzek
October 1st 2009


930 Comments


Don't worry about it man. People are just generally lazy to post on here with new members or music that's not really well known. Either that or it needs a few fucknuts to go apeshit over something totally unrelated, which is equally useful!

About your review, it's a good start for a first review. You obviously spent a lot of time on it, maybe too much on deciding how to compose every sentence. Again, don't worry about that. It's a common problem that almost everyone can relate to. Beats reading reviews by uninformed idiots that ramble on in on in third grade level English.

Try to bundle your paragraphs together a little more. You don't want a massive wall of text but you also don't want a lot of broken up broken paragraphs like this review has. It doesn't flow as nicely. At the end you do a little track by track, which isn't succesful after the entire review. Try to work in some of the track names when you describe the sound. This way people will also have a few tunes to check out when they decide to go to myspace or youtube.

Your use of language is interesting. Are you a native English speaker? You use a lot of overly descriptive sentences. Sometimes it makes sentences sound awkward:

zuzek
October 1st 2009


930 Comments


"It brings about a array of time signatures, sounds sufficient, and is tight in precision (not airtight, just tight). There is a fair share of rhythmically challenging beats as well and some jazz-like cymbal work in some slow passages that showcases the drummer's limb independence controlling the hi-hats as well as having some great sounding crashes. As an example, “Christmas Is Back” features some interesting tom-work throughout along with some breakneck fills."

The sentence construction just sounds weird. The percussion 'brings about' an array of time signatures? Just say that it's complex and why it is, instead of trying to use higher level English words and construct a difficult sentence. How can it be tight in precision? Sounds weird. Of course the drumming is challenging when you've said there are a lot of different time signatures. That whole sentence could use some breaking up into multiple sentences or some interpunction. It's long and hard to follow sometimes because it jumps from one thing to the other without flow. I'm just using this passage as an example instead of being exhaustive about your entire review. I don't mean this is a harsh way since essentially the writing is alright. I'm just trying to help you by pointing out where you can improve. I feel that you'll write in a very different manner in the next couple of reviews. Simplicity is usually key. Just think things over before writing them down but don't dwell on them too long because then it just becomes pretentious and hard to follow. Let a review be for a day, reread it. It's helpful, trust me.

The best way to get better is to keep reviewing and read reviews by staff or contributing members. Not all of them are skillfully done and not all of them are great writers in my humble opinion, but I would like to argue that at least most of them try to do a good job on it and know what they talk about.

Hope to have helped.

YouAreMySilence
December 7th 2009


3726 Comments


I'll venture down your rabbit hole ;)

FigNewtns
January 18th 2010


777 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

i quite like this. has anyone heard that song they released a few months back?

TRMshadow
January 21st 2010


5119 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

this is........ interesting

GibTG
January 26th 2010


284 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I've made some serious changes to this god-awful review, hopefully it is significantly improved.



Thanks to zuzek for the critiquing. I welcome any other input and especially would appreciate comments on my second review.

http://www.sputnikmusic.com/album.php?albumid=47034

Tum0r
August 18th 2011


9 Comments


Listen to Lions and then listen to Daughters, you'll shit brix !


Tyler.
April 27th 2012


19021 Comments


this is so weird



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy