The Beatles
Revolver


3.0
good

Review

by Chewie USER (22 Reviews)
December 3rd, 2008 | 104 replies


Release Date: 1966 | Tracklist

Review Summary: The Beatles has been out-done by decades of music improving, but Revolver is still a simplistic, enjoyable album, to some extent.

Whenever a scientific break-through occurs, everyone is excited at how it will be able to benefit society and man-kind as a whole. The scientist responsible for the break-through is heralded with awards and congratulated for his advanced theory. But over time, new discoveries are made and this original break-through is no longer as relevant as it once was. The scientist is no longer credited as much as before, because his theories have been improved on and updated. This idea that scientific discoveries eventually become outdated and are no longer relevant in present day can certainly be related be related to music, although it certainly doesn’t apply to it as much, specifically The Beatles’ Revolver.

The Beatles have always been thought of as one of the greatest rock bands of all time. The band has receives praise like this along with other hyper-bolic claims because they expanded what music was like in their time and they have set roots for what music has become today. The Beatles have certainly influenced a lot and are incredibly significant to the history of rock and roll. Because of this, critics, fans and the world over have credited The Beatles with adoration and applause for years. But the way I look at it, significance doesn’t necessarily equal quality. These days, with the growing metal genre, the complexity and caliber of the instrumentation certainly outdoes what is on Revolver. Indie lyricists have came up with brilliant, insightful lyrics that are undoubtedly above songs like I Want To Tell You. It is clear that the bar for song writing and music in general have been raised since the 60s.

Now that doesn’t necessarily make The Beatles’ music bad. The majority of the tracks on Revolver have very easy and simple instrumentation, and elementary, straightforward lyrics. But this is also what can be enjoyable for people. It is simple music for a simple listen. At time people don’t want incredibly complex and deep music, and this is where The Beatles are more than appropriate. What cannot be denied about the songs on Revolver is the terrific melodies that inhabit these songs. The singing from Lennon and McCartney are excellent, each chorus having a brilliant singing part to them. The cheery, happy-go lucky feel to the songs(save Eleanor Rigby) will bring a smile to any persons face.

Also, there are a few exceptions to the simplicity of the album. Taxman actually has a satirically dark lyrical approach to it: “Let me tell you how it will be; There's one for you, nineteen for me, Cause I’m the taxman, yeah, I’m the taxman. Should five per cent appear to small? Be thankful I don’t take it all. Cause I’m the taxman, yeah, I’m the taxman.” Eleanor Rigby has a melancholy, depressing feel to it, and is also assisted by some swooning violins. But easily the best song on the album is Tomorrow Never Knows, with its absolute tripped out feel, brilliantly experimental elements, and absolutely tremendous vocal delivery. Tomorrow Never Knows is The Beatles’ best song in my opinion, and is certainly Revolver’s greatest moment.

There also are some exotic instrumental moments on the album that are above average. Love You To has George Harrison’s terrific voice at its best, but is not where the song shines. The middle-eastern sound that The Beatles are known for delving in is full force on Love You To. A sit-tar solo opens the song, until an infectious strumming pattern comes in.
Harrison’s voice really hooks you to the song, and the chorus is simply wonderful.

But the majority of the tracks suffer all of the same problems that I mentioned earlier; Easy, boring instrumentation, contrived and elementary lyrics, and a much too simple approach to the songs in general. Although the singing is terrific, and the happy and relaxed feel is all there, it still isn’t enough for the songs to achieve anything significant. Although For No One succeeds because of its simplicity. The melancholy yet upbeat tone to the song cascades a cheery, yet disgruntled mood. With some easy piano playing, a simple yet effective lyrical story, and a gentle delivery from Mr. McCartney, the song is able to stand out where the other more simple songs fall flat.

One of the biggest problems with most of the tracks on the album is that they becoming incredibly generic to one another, and certain songs blend with the rest of the album much too easily. This leads to a certain lack of flow, which is what makes all of their other albums shine. The album high-lights are scattered throughout the mediocre tracks, which disturbs any coherency that the album could have had.

It is evident in music today that the songs of The Beatles have been improved and simply out-performed. There are some melodic elements that are pleasing, but over-all the album is rudimentary. That is not necessarily a bad thing, because some of the songs are quite enjoyable thanks to the simplicity. It just shows that The Beatles are over-rated and are no longer musical marvels as they once were. But thanks to few exceptions to these problems, with songs that really are exceptional, Revolver makes for a pleasing album, to some extent.



Recent reviews by this author
King Dice Red VersionMono Hymn to the Immortal Wind
Modest Mouse We Were Dead Before the Ship Even SankNine Inch Nails The Fragile
Depeche Mode ViolatorOkkervil River Black Sheep Boy
user ratings (4281)
4.5
superb
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
PunkItUp
December 3rd 2008


207 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

good review. i like this album a lot more then you



what does this mean:



The Beatles has been out-done by decades of music improving





EDIT: forget it i see what you mean by it. doesn't make much sense to me tbh but poopty doo....This Message Edited On 12.03.08

Bleak123
December 3rd 2008


1900 Comments


this is a fantastic record and idk why you are comparing it to modern music scene at all, especially when you talk about metal having improved technically. this has nothing to do with metal. at all!

other than that ok review but i disagree completely

Serpento
December 3rd 2008


2351 Comments


all the hyphenated things are 1 word sans out-perform

IsItLuck?
Emeritus
December 3rd 2008


4957 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I read like 3 sentences from this and it sounds like it is constructed pretty poorly.



Specifically this paragraph which made me want to vomit



"The Beatles have always been thought of as one of the greatest rock bands of all time. Most of this praise is because they expanded what music was like in their time and set roots for what music has become today. The Beatles influenced a lot and are incredibly significant to the history of rock and roll. But the way I look at it, significance doesn’t necessarily equal quality. These days, with the growing metal genre, the complexity and caliber of the instrumentation certainly outdoes what is on Revolver. Indie lyricists have came up with brilliant, insightful lyrics that are undoubtedly above songs like I Want To Tell You. It is clear that the bar for song writing and music in general have been raised since the 60s."

PunkItUp
December 3rd 2008


207 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I read like 3 sentences from this and it sounds like it is constructed pretty poorly.



Specifically this paragraph which made me want to vomit




hey man you're supposed to be a kind and caring staff reviewer. how about some words of encouragement for those less inclined to greatness



"made me want to vomit" is not very constructive!



but you gotta call 'em as you see 'em This Message Edited On 12.03.08

ninjuice
December 3rd 2008


6760 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Ugh I hate getting into this influence versus quality debate. At least with this band, since they've put out a lot of amazing music.

Just because the instrumentation and/or lyrics have been outdone doesn't mean the music is bad. Especially since they weren't really trying to be uber-technical or write amazing lyrics. (at least I don't think so).

PunkItUp
December 3rd 2008


207 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

^ yeah if that were the case John Coltrane and Woody Guthrie would be like, complete no talent bums



can't blame the Beatles because they were around in the '60's and not now. and besides we've got Oasis!

Chewie
December 3rd 2008


4544 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Just because the instrumentation and/or lyrics have been outdone doesn't mean the music is bad




And I clearly agree with that in the review

Spamue1G
December 3rd 2008


1291 Comments


Needs a bit of fixing up, but not bad. I think I like this a bit more than you from what I've heard of it (and The Beatles in general) but I really do see your point. So almost agreed.

ninjuice
December 3rd 2008


6760 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

if that were the case John Coltrane and Woody Guthrie would be like, complete no talent bums


same with Hendrix, to some extent.

The review is written well and everything, but I still think your arguments are a bit lame. At least you didn't give this a 1 because it isn't classical!

And I clearly agree with that in the review


Not necessarily, you say that the songs are boring because the instrumentation and songs are simple.This Message Edited On 12.03.08

Spamue1G
December 3rd 2008


1291 Comments


Wait, John Coltrane's been outdone? By who? I've always thought that he's one of the best...

IsItLuck?
Emeritus
December 3rd 2008


4957 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

hey man you're supposed to be a kind and caring staff reviewer. how about some words of encouragement for those less inclined to greatness



"made me want to vomit" is not very constructive!



but you gotta call 'em as you see 'em


You can't be constructive on matters like 'Revolver isn't as good as people say it is because look at the music we have today, like the technicality in metal!'



That's just stupidThis Message Edited On 12.03.08

PunkItUp
December 3rd 2008


207 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Wait, John Coltrane's been outdone? By who? I've always thought that he's one of the best...


nah that guy is old and lacks modern recording techniques



listen to some Kenny G he outdoes Coltrane by decades of improved music This Message Edited On 12.03.08

Bleak123
December 3rd 2008


1900 Comments


You can't be constructive on matters like 'Revolver isn't as good as people say it is because look at the music we have today, like the technicality in metal!'

That's just stupid


123.

PunkItUp
December 3rd 2008


207 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

hey man stop asslicking to "more respected" members lol :p

Chewie
December 3rd 2008


4544 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I stated in my review that the lack of technicality doesn't necessarily make it bad, I was just proving how over-rated the Beatles are, because the expectation for music is way higher today then it was in the 60s,(ie: the complexity of metal these days) that The Beatles have become insignificant in comparison. That's what I was trying to capture with that point, I guess I should have made it clearer.This Message Edited On 12.03.08

PunkItUp
December 3rd 2008


207 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

i think you made your point based on that aspect. i just think you attached too much weight to it



the songs on this album are superb, production is impeccable for its time. if it were made today with today's standards in mind it would be epic. given it had the same cultural impact, etc



no one today has really made an album like this. seldom few will in an entire careerThis Message Edited On 12.03.08

ClearTheLane
December 3rd 2008


990 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Yeah, again.

This album certainly is overrated in some accounts, but only its significance and influence make it deserve more than a 3/5.

Bleak123
December 3rd 2008


1900 Comments


i get what you mean i just think its a void argument

Chewie
December 3rd 2008


4544 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

meh



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy