Queen
News of the World


2.0
poor

Review

by gblackman USER (25 Reviews)
September 25th, 2008 | 20 replies


Release Date: 1977 | Tracklist

Review Summary: If anything News of the World is a bigger step back than A day at the Races ever was. Yes not only have the vocal harmonies basically vanished but instead they’ve reverted back to the attempted heavy metal days of Queen and Queen II.

The year is 1977 Punk rules the airwaves suddenly bands like Pink Floyd and Led Zeppelin aren’t popular anymore (well outside the US anyway) another band suffering in a dip in popularity is Queen. The euphoria that surrounded their 1975 smash Bohemian Rhapsody seems to have died as quickly as it lived.

Somebody to Love although a big hit wasn’t the smash the band hoped for and the album A day at the Races fared even worse. More importantly musical tastes had dramatically changed. Gone were flamboyance and extravagance, coming in was rebellion, expression and ferocity especially from middle class acts who wanted a piece of fame.

Queen knew they would have to change just like they did for their breakthrough successes Sheer Heart Attack and A Night at the Opera and when We Will Rock You hit the airwaves it seemed that change had come it’s simple yet refreshing drum beat of dah dah dum wasn’t only catchy it was infectious. Just as much was the soon to follow We are the Champions a song of which just by itself seemed as if the band were crying out not to be forgotten or left behind like so many other acts suddenly were.

As I stated earlier in my A day at the Races review the problem with that album is that Queen became stuck in a rot and seemingly had no forward direction and most of the songs in that album therefore became tepid or uninspired.

We will rock you and We are the Champions promised to change that though so when News of the World came out everyone must have been expecting a new and vitalised Queen to come roaring out of the barriers just like they did for A Night at the Opera or just as a track like Tie your mother down had promised. So was this Queen moving forward with a new purpose? Had the band learned from their mistakes? Well actually no.

If anything News of the World is a bigger step back than A day at the Races ever was. Yes not only have the vocal harmonies basically vanished but instead they’ve reverted back to the attempted heavy metal days of Queen and Queen II and just like those releases bad heavy metal.

We will rock you and We are the Champions open the album on a false dawn these are great tracks but the rest bar a track or two are uninspired retreads of things that were already done. This is not moving forward or new it’s the same old stuff they did before only now the mistakes are far worse. It’s like having a copy of a 3rd generation tape, you just know it’s gonna be bad.

We get to Sheer Heart Attack; the title alone reverts back to earlier and better days. And although on the surface seems like a Queen dig at punk but is really a poor mans Stone Cold Crazy. Here though the production is poor, the song just abruptly stops for no reason, the lyrics are forgettable or non-sensicle at best but worst of all if this was an attempt at Punk then the band have still missed the point for the same reason they did on their first two releases when they attempted Heavy Metal I’ll state in capitals PUNK IS AN EXPRESSION NOT JUST NOISE!

If people really think that the only reason that bands like The Sex Pistols, The Clash and The Jam became popular were because they were loud then they’ve completely misunderstood what Punk was all about. Yes it was loud music but it was about expressing the desire to have and wish for better things or at time to express hate for the life one was living. It was not just screaming and swearing it was a form of self expression. There were more established bands who did understand that. The Rolling Stones got it completely right for their 1978 smash Some Girls. David Bowie responded by hiring New Wave producer Brian Eno of Roxy Music fame for the brilliant Low & Heroes albums.

In otherwords these were artists who were expressing themselves in response to the changing times. What we have here in News of the World though is the same as we did for A Day at the Races yes the production is a little different but the feeling is the same. Trepid, not there, and just artificial. In otherwords they didn’t change they just reverted back to either doing Zeppelin or Sabbath rip offs or whatever else they could rip off. The other apparent is that they just rehashed what they had done before cos you know it was so successful.

For example All Dead, All Dead is perhaps now the third version of 39 after Long Away and it really feels like a 3rd generation copy too. The lyrics mean nothing and Brian May is simply going through the same motions that he did during the 2nd generation version on A Day at the Races.

At least Spread your Wings is a decent song even if it feels more like In the lap of the gods… revisited part II. Fight from the Inside though is just dreadful and it should be no surprise as it’s a Roger Taylor performed song. Remember all those fun times we’ve had with Modern Times rock ‘n’ roll, Tenement Funkster and Drowse well the funs just become quadruple guys.

But low and behold things couldn’t get worse could they? I mean remember all those good times in the early days when I would constantly compare some Queen songs as bad Zeppelin rip-offs. But they soon seemingly grew out of that by the time Sheer Heart Attack came out and even though A day at the races was hardly great at least there was no unnecessary Zeppelin style riffs or songs or whatever else the band wanted to try and copy. But then there’s Get down make love.

Dear God if you’ve ever wanted to know what a bad Zeppelin rip-off sounds like then here it is. Granted the piano intro is promising but then Robert Plant… sorry Freddie goes on and on about wanting to make love and squeeze lemons… ok there’s no lemon squeezing in the song but if they could I’m sure they would have fit it in some how. There’s even the Zeppelin style guitar wah wah in the middle of the song with Freddie bellowing out ‘Make love, make love’ only here it’s a million times more cheesy. If you want to hear this song done better I advise you go out and buy Led Zeppelin’s debut album and check out a song called Dazed and Confused trust me you won’t be disappointed.

Then comes the boogie pimp Sleeping on the sidewalk that ain’t to bad to be honest. It’s basically Brian May attempting to do some cool American rock ‘n’ roll and it works kinda well. Certainly better than any Zeppelin rip-off ever could.

Who Needs You is a simple latino style medley that sadly passes the listener by. Then comes finally another great moment in this album It’s Late. This is a rip-roarious power ballad of a song. Kinda like an expansion of Now I’m Here. For the first time in ages Freddie’s vocal’s sound purposeful and not like their just going through the motions. It’s a love song about how just when you’re about to reveal your true feelings it turns out to be too late.

The album ends on the decent if not average medley of My Melancholy Blues. It suffers in truth to the same problems that You take my breath Away from A day at the races does in that it’s decent but nothing more. Still it ends the album on a kinda sombre if not disappointing note.

Phew got through that at last. So here’s the usual recap.

WE WILL ROCK YOU
Classic that anyone can sing along to. 5/5

WE ARE THE CHAMPIONS
Another classic that anyone can sing along to. 5/5

SHEER HEART ATTACK
Punk/Hard Rock attempt gone all wrong. 1/5

ALL DEAD, ALL DEAD
Does what the title says. 1/5

SPREAD YOUR WINGS
Decent song. Nothing special though. 2.5/5

FIGHT FROM THE INSIDE
Another awful Roger Taylor song. 1/5

GET DOWN MAKE LOVE
Led Zeppelin cover… what it’s not??? 1/5

SLEEPING ON THE SIDEWALK
Average if not bad Brian May boogie. 2/5

WHO NEEDS YOU
Like the Spanish style guitar even if there’s nothing else to like. 1.5/5

IT’S LATE
Great anthem track. Wish more of the songs in this album were as good as this one. 4/5

MY MELANCHOLY BLUES
Decent ending. Not spectacular but decent. 2.5/5

That gives this album an average of 2.4 which ranks it so far as Queen’s worst.

Here’s the grades for the others.

Queen 2.7
Queen II 2.59
Sheer Heart Attack 3
A Night at the Opera 3.98
A day at the races 2.59

TO CONCLUDE

I was really glad when this album finished (which is a bad sign). I never felt like this whilst listening to any of the previous five but this album apart from the first two songs and It’s Late was pompous, uninspired and just plain dull and boring.

2/5



Recent reviews by this author
Queen Queen on Fire: Live at the BowlQueen The Platinum Collection
Queen Greatest Hits IIIQueen Queen Rocks
Queen Made in HeavenQueen Live at Wembley '86
user ratings (905)
3.9
excellent
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
rasputin
September 25th 2008


14967 Comments


Seriously, one review a day mate, you're pushing other reviews off the page.

NOTINTHEFACE
September 25th 2008


2142 Comments


Dude... do you READ your review comments? Listen to what these people keep telling you... trust me, they know what they're talking about. You've made the exact same mistakes every single review.

marksellsuswallets
September 25th 2008


4884 Comments


I swear if you mention Led Zeppelin or Pink Floyd one more time...they aren't trying to be them and they aren't on the same level so please please please quit mentioning them it gives me heart palpitations!

gblackman
September 25th 2008


50 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

^ Actually a few years back Roger Taylor was giving an award to Jimmy Page for a life time achievement in music and admitted back then that Queen had stolen many tricks from Led Zeppelin.

marksellsuswallets
September 25th 2008


4884 Comments


Just because they stole "a few tricks" doesn't mean they tried to be Led Zeppelin, and even if they did that doesn't merit multiple mentions in every review for every album...it makes it seem like you just write the same thing over and over for every album...Just review the album itself...comparisons are fine but to do it that much gets in the way of the review...

Also, do you have any idea at all what a comma is?This Message Edited On 09.25.08

Serpento
September 25th 2008


2351 Comments


aside from the normal comments of "lrn2write" that you've seemed to forego reading in your other reviews, this album was a retaliation to the group being called old during the punk explosion. hence, they mocked it throughout the album. so they aren't reverting back to q1&2 here, but using it as a tool.

gblackman
September 25th 2008


50 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

^Actually I never mentioned Zeppelin at all for the Sheer Heart Attack, A night at the Opera or A day at the races reviews.



And I think you'll find I have reviewed the entire album.

Erratic
September 25th 2008


1120 Comments


I think you need to reevaluate how you use the rating system. IMO album ratings shouldn't be about the average score of all the tracks. But hey, if you think those ratings feel right, then go ahead and keep doing it.

marksellsuswallets
September 25th 2008


4884 Comments


Yeah...you still talked about Floyd and The Kinks for a paragraph each...just please go through all your reviews and take to hear the suggestions therein..

gblackman
September 25th 2008


50 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

^ it depends on the band. For a Pink Floyd album yeah I'd agree but Queen in general were a Rock/Pop band so you kinda have to review it track by track and then use your gut. For example this album was a 2.4 I could have given it a 2.5/5 but my gut said 2. Anyway I don't hate this album enough to give it a one I just don't think it's that good.This Message Edited On 09.25.08

marksellsuswallets
September 25th 2008


4884 Comments


No...you never have to review anything track by track...that is severely frowned upon...its much better and cohesive (not to mention way easier to read) to just give a feel for the album as a whole and then mention a few tracks sparingly if necessary...

gblackman
September 25th 2008


50 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

^ My last comment was for Erratic. But I do use my gut the track by track review is to really analyse the album. But at the end I use my gut and usually I have a grade in my head before. This just reassures myself.



Also my gut for A night at the Opera was 3.5 but after listening to the album again (as I do with all the albums before I do a review) I discovered it was a better album than I remembered and used the rating system to guide me to a 4.

Willie
Moderator
September 25th 2008


20212 Comments


How about instead of disputing the minor things you go back and read some of the comments for your other carbon-copy reviews and try to fix something. At least read the part that says to only post one review at a time, damn.

freudianslipknot
September 25th 2008


803 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Your lack of understanding and knowledge of music in the 1970s disqualifies your opinions on all of your Queen reviews. Do more research if you weren't actually alive then. You do realise that Queen's primary influence was the Beatles - or to quote Brian May: "For us the Beatles were like the Bible" or words to that effect. Also the essence of many Queen's songs is satire, pastiche and parody - it's hard to actually believe, because Queen is not a cerebral band, but it seems that most of their stuff actually goes over your head.

gblackman
September 25th 2008


50 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

^actually I do know this and I know how you know this because Brian May said that during the making of Bohemian Rhapsody documentary on the Greatest Hits DVD.



Also I have stated on previous reviews that Queen were great Pop musicians who could churn out amazing 3-4 minute pop songs like The Beatles but just like The Beatles they had their limitations the only difference was that The Beatles were more clever at handling their limitations than Queen were.

Mindtraveller
February 13th 2010


13 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

You're a critic wannabe. Oh yes! You are. I've already told you this... nevermind. I don't like your reviews. You don't write arguments. Never.

And it seems you're not able to understand Queen's music. Nope.

JimmyJJJ
May 4th 2013


63 Comments


wtf, we will rock you and we are the champions 5 out of 5 and spread your wings 2.5 out of 5. you are intensively brainless.

Havey
June 7th 2013


12070 Comments


RIP gblackman

JimmyJJJ
June 13th 2013


63 Comments


lol

zork1222
February 13th 2018


35 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Terrible review. This guy has no idea about great music.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy