">
 

Dmitri Shostakovich
Piano Concerto No. 2 in F major, Op. 102


3.0
good

Review

by taylormemer USER (92 Reviews)
June 22nd, 2008 | 6 replies


Release Date: 1957 | Tracklist


In 1957, Dmitri Shostakovich set upon composing his second piano concerto. After his first demonstrated an atypical construct of tone rows, and classic Shostakovich like sombre motifs, his second was composed for his son, Maxim’s, 19th birthday. Maxim would actually go on to premiere the piece on the date of his 19th birthday, May 10th, 1957. Naturally, the concerto is therefore a bit more jovial than his other efforts; making this a refreshing listen, at least by his standards.

Following the death of Joseph Stalin, the USSR underwent a major social change. Due to the communistic dictatorship from Stalin which left many artists alike exiled, or shunned, his death marked a turning point for the artwork which ensued. Such a turning point found its necessary path to the now well known Shostakovich. Not only is this work of a social importance for the composer, it was also written in the composer’s apex period, which saw other monumental works such as his Tenth Symphony give rise to important personification in music from such a restrained part of the world.

Not many will be appropriately familiar with music from Shostakovich, so such a piano concerto to the general population may seem a bit redundant. However, often overlooked is the second movement, “Andante,” which is probably one of his most recognisable and moving pieces ever composed. The strings commence the piece very subdued, and sorrowful, which will probably startle many listeners, who by now are accustomed to the sheik rhythmical interplay witnessed in the first movement. For a while, it appears if the piece is comprised of static chords, but almost inaudibly, the piano begins to scribe its musical ink all over the page effortlessly. Such harmonic quality is rarely witnessed in a lot of concerto music, and yet while the movement is purely serene in design, another haunting presence seems to linger about the pianists hands, in a rather disturbing way. It simply could be Shostakovich trying to demonstrate emotional decay, but perhaps it has more to do with the composer’s darker past which certainly would still have haunted him.

So many critics have dismissed many of Shostakovich’s concertos, as merely same-ol’ musical jargon, only derived from earlier composers. Indeed, this concerto doesn’t have a whole lot to offer, musically, with the exception of “Andante.” But in a unique twist of events, the final movement, “Allegro,” if played correctly and to a quick tempo, can be thoroughly enjoyed, especially if both musical parties (mainly piano and wind section) can maintain performance tightness. Shostakovich himself often played this movement to exceedingly fast tempos, which today aren’t witnessed in most recordings. Part of the reason behind this was to encourage his son, to practice the infamous finger exercises determined by Charles-Louis Hanon at speed.

It’s an interesting work to say the least. It’s a work which was written for many accounts, from his son’s stubbornness to play Hanon, to his son’s actual birthday, and then onto personal celebration from an important musical era for him. Such a work, like so many others, can only be fully enjoyed through either live performance, or more idealistically, personal musical understanding, but by and large the piece should entertain most.



Recent reviews by this author
Hans Zimmer InterstellarMachine Head Bloodstone And Diamonds
Arch Enemy War EternalCavern Cavern
Hans Zimmer The Dark Knight RisesPeriphery Periphery II: This Time It's Personal
user ratings (20)
3.7
great


Comments:Add a Comment 
Poet
June 22nd 2008


6144 Comments


Good review

Not many will be appropriately familiar with music from Shostakovich

I have never even heard of this guy lol.

taylormemer
June 22nd 2008


4964 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Well, if you do happen to explore anything of his, get this first, and listen to Andante, you will be pleasantly surprised.



Followed by his tenth symphony.This Message Edited On 06.22.08

taylormemer
June 22nd 2008


4964 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Double postThis Message Edited On 06.22.08

SirArthur6
February 12th 2013


266 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Only a 3!



Disappointed



This is worth at least a 4.

Doctuses
June 28th 2018


1914 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off

this is fucking awful

arapinho1
February 7th 2020


335 Comments


You're too harsh on this work Doc. Second movement is beautiful



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy