Falling Up
Dawn Escapes


4.0
excellent

Review

by scarsremain USER (7 Reviews)
November 27th, 2007 | 17 replies


Release Date: 2005 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Falling Ups sophomore record is better than their first. But on how many levels

Dawn Escapes is the second release from the alt rockers Falling Up. Their previous record smashed into the music business with massive success. It featured the hit singles Broken Heart, Bittersweet, and the underground hit JacksonFive. Their sophomore debut features more mature lyrics, written entirely through metaphors and odd meanings. This is my Track by Track review of the album.

01. Searchlights. The opening track of the album. Starts off with a cool synth thing, then the drums kick in and a metalized guitar starts playing a riff. The band kicks in to Falling Ups new, heavier, but not really style. A good song, but the chorus sounds repetitive with the Third song. 4/5

02. Exhibition. This song should have been a single. The chorus and playing in this song are better than the next song, which should not have been a single. Jesse’s singing is really good in this song, as are the lyrics.5/5

03. Flights. The first single of the album, but not really that good. It’s an okay song to begin with, but it doesn’t seem like a single to me. Overall good song, sounds similar to Searchlights. 4/5

04. Exit Calypsan{Only in my Dreams}. The second single of the album, which prompts you to go ahead and sing along. The lyrics are really good on this one. A.Dub really shines on the keys this time around. 4.5/5

05. Contact. Third single. Best song on the album. The ballad of the set, and a really good one at that. Has an interesting lyrical pattern and the chorus is truly awesome. Highly recommended.5/5

06. Moonlit. The first song I heard from Falling Up, so it holds great significance to me. The hardest song on the album, and the fastest. It’s a really enjoyable listen. This song is a reason to buy this CD. 4.9/5

This is the second half of the album which gets progressively worse. I don’t understand having a Killer first 6 songs, then making 6 almost filler tracks. It just doesn’t make sense to me.

07. Cascades. A close to filler track. The singer’s voice is starting to get on my nerves at this point. At least the lyrics are alright. 3/5

08.Meridians. Another close to filler track. The title is slightly interesting, so it gets a 2.5/5

09. Lights of Reedsport. Finally some fresh air. This is a great song, especially compared to the preceding 2 songs. The lyrics are a little weird having to do with feeling Christ through being erased. Comes of a little negative, but its still a good song. 4.8/5

10. Marathons. A good song with great lyrics. But it could easily slide into the filler niche if it wasn’t careful. 4/5

11. Fearless. I think I know what happened here. Falling Up decides to write 6 killer catchy songs (the first half). Then write 6 songs with bad music, but good lyrics. Fearless is the perfect example of this cliché. 4/5

12. Intro the Gravity. Again, could qualify as a Filler track, but the synths on this song are awesome. I tip my hat to Mr. A Dub for pulling this song of perfectly. The synths are the only reason it’s worth a listen. 4.5

Pros
Contact
Good Lyrics
Great music

Cons
Repetitive
Second half failure
Jesse’s singing gets annoying after a while.

Recommended Tracks
The Singles
Exhibition
Contact (again because it’s worth it.)



Recent reviews by this author
Disciple (USA-TN) DiscipleLinkin Park Minutes to Midnight
Red (USA) End of SilenceLinkin Park Projekt Revolution 8/13/07
Thousand Foot Krutch The Art of BreakingPapa Roach The Paramour Sessions
user ratings (113)
3.3
great
other reviews of this album
atrink (3.5)
A step up from crashings and a step in the right direction...

bentheREDfan (3.5)
This is the motion....

Calypsan (4)
Falling Up, well, does just that with the always-interesting Dawn Escapes....



Comments:Add a Comment 
ninjuice
November 27th 2007


6760 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Like the last one, needs much more detail on the actual music. The first song description is decent, but the rest aren't.

Also, giving a CD where 6 out of 12 tracks are "almost filler" a 4 doesn't make sense.

And a big LOL to your 5 album ratings.This Message Edited On 11.27.07

TheGreatD17
November 27th 2007


1141 Comments


Your rating makes no sense, your summary makes no sense, and I've never heard of this band, so your second and third sentences make no sense (perhaps among the CCM audience these guys are big, but massively successful?).

ninjuice
November 27th 2007


6760 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

[quote=TheGreatD17](perhaps among the CCM audience these guys are big[/quote]That's what he meant.

TheGreatD17
November 27th 2007


1141 Comments


well if they were a massively successful CCM band like Switchfoot, I would probably be familiar with them

jrowa001
November 27th 2007


8752 Comments


i saw these guys live a few years ago with TFK. i dont really listen to this anymore but i still think it's a decent album

roofi
November 27th 2007


959 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

ninjuice, the last part of your first comment was unnecessary and ironic, considering some of the bands you give high ratings to.

scarsremain, sorry man, but you really have to give more descriptions of what the music actually sounds like. You don't have to go into long, boring descriptions of it, but you have to at least mention what a band sounds like or what some similar bands might be so that someone who hasn't heard the band knows what you're talking about. Keep trying.

botb
November 27th 2007


17829 Comments


falling up is a decent band but this review doesn't give it much justice. seriously dude... it looks like you spent about 10 minutes on this.

[quote=scarsremain]07. Cascades. A close to filler track. The singer’s voice is starting to get on my nerves at this point. At least the lyrics are alright. 3/5

08.Meridians. Another close to filler track. The title is slightly interesting, so it gets a 2.5/5[/quote]

that's your description of two songs. all i know is that you are a bit peeved at the singer's voice by the 7th song and the title to the 8th song is interesting... how about something to describe the music for someone that hasn't heard it.

and if there are so many low rated songs and "almost-fillers" how is this a 4?This Message Edited On 11.27.07

ninjuice
November 27th 2007


6760 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

[quote=roofi]ninjuice, the last part of your first comment was unnecessary and ironic, considering some of the bands you give high ratings to.[/quote]LOL! This coming from someone who gives Relient K, Skillet and Thousand Foot Krutch 4's (and higher)

[quote=TheGreatD17]well if they were a massively successful CCM band like Switchfoot, I would probably be familiar with them[/quote]Have you heard of Newsboys? Probably not, but both of these bands are quite successful in the Christian music realm - which is what the review was trying to say.This Message Edited On 03.30.08

roofi
November 27th 2007


959 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

well, of the 4's and up the only band that might not deserve them is Bon Jovi. I could say the exact same thing about yours.


It's not about that, I just didn't really like that you threw that last little insult in there that was unrelated to anything regarding this review.

ninjuice
November 27th 2007


6760 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

It's not like there's any better place for me to put it. And anyone that gives Minutes to Midnight a 5, well......

roofi
November 28th 2007


959 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Well yeah, neither MTM or Blackout are even close to approaching 5's for me either, but it's not like he was saying on this thread, "OMG, BLACKOUT AND MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT R AWSUM!!!!!" There are more tactful ways of saying "your taste sucks", in my book.

NortherlyNanook
November 28th 2007


1286 Comments


However, just telling him his taste sucks is as pointless as not saying his taste sucks.

Instead, recommending bands that he could get into that are easily better would be the decent course of action here, but instead it's just mocking his tastes.

botb
November 28th 2007


17829 Comments


Here are bands you should start with in 75% of sputnik

Opeth
The Mars Volta
Opeth
Maudlin of the Well
Opeth
Porcupine Tree
Opeth
Anything with John Petrucci
did I mention Opeth?

sadly enough, this is very tasteful to me too. haha.

altairschaos56
November 30th 2007


362 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

SCARSREMAIN check out my Black Parade review! It's finally up!!

altairschaos56
November 30th 2007


362 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

SCARSREMAIN is cool...Not as cool as Linkin Park or My Chem, but is 97.8% cooler than FOB...Halo is cooler than FOB...And Halo sux....

altairschaos56
December 5th 2007


362 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Hey Jakoby, I just posted my Minutes To Midnight review. Check it out!This Message Edited On 12.05.07

south_of_heaven 11
December 5th 2007


5612 Comments


Don't spam your reviews.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy