">
 

Alerion
Fledgling


2.0
poor

Review

by Pedro B. USER (364 Reviews)
November 20th, 2007 | 17 replies


Release Date: 2007 | Tracklist


After WillieFisterbut did a negative review on this band, and since he mentioned that the EP was free, I decided to give a try, if only to be able to prove my fellow reviewer wrong. Unfortunately, I agree with him on every count.

Alerion are a female fronted band from the Netherlands, so it’s pretty obvious they’re going to sound like The Gathering. And indeed, their fronting chick sounds quite like Anneke Van Giesbergen. In what concerns everything else, though, this band wishes they were like The Gathering.

Alerion are a self-proclaimed “female fronted Metal band with a Progressive edge”. Well, they are female-fronted, and they do play Metal, but I am sort of lost as to where the “progressive” part of their sound is.

Sure, when I first started playing this demo, I was graced with a quite pleasant acoustic track. Estrangement is reminiscent of the old 80’s thrash intro, and while the guitarists occasionally try to fit too many notes into one space, it is actually quite pleasing. By the end of this short track, my hopes were high and I was champing at the bit for what would come next.

Unfortunately, the beginning of the next track was a bucket of ice-cold water right down my spine. What we get on Hindsight (1976) is a plodding, messy guitar riff accompanied by worse drumming. Is this the progressive edge, then? I reckon not. Hell, Tom G. Warrior would think this riff was basic. Quorthon would think this riff was basic. Those guys in Darkthrone would think this was basic, for Christ’s sake. And the same can be said for the drumming – not only is it basic, it’s just plain awful. Soon the chick comes in singing, and it’s immediately clear she is no operatic diva. She’s got a more rock-ish type of voice (similar, as noted, to Anneke van Giesbergen) and actually sounds quite pleasant. Her voice drives most of these songs forward, surmounting the awful riffs and the pitiful production, and effectively building some pleasant choruses. Actually, I feel sorry for the band’s choruses, because they’re quite nice and deserved to be in a much better album than this. All these tracks have quite pleasing chorus sections, fun to sing along to, but ultimately marred by the realization that the backing music is So. Damn. Basic. Additionally, in an attempt to sound “progressive”, the band inserts some too-sudden tempo changes in their songs. These changes aren’t well done; they’re too sudden (we’ll be listening to one riff, and then all of a sudden everything changes completely around) and they feel tacked-on, badly glued to the song, kind of like some parts of old Kirk Hammett solos. And did I mention they’re basic as hell?

This is all the more puzzling once we start listening to the solos. Like the choruses, most of them are actually pretty kick-***. The second solo on 1976, for example. Or the solo on the following track Ruins. This raises a further point – if the musicians can actually play, why are their riffs so awful? Surely two guitarists that can pull off solos like these – in a band that brands themselves “progressive” – can come up with some more inventive riffs? To see the full extent of what I’m saying, listen to the backing riff behind the solo on 1976 – that riff is the full extent of the band’s sucky rhythm-guitar work. Really, really frustrating.

What’s worse, the production doesn’t favour the band one iota. It’s just as crappy as everything else, exceedingly thin and dry, and it totally chops off the bass (the bassist might as well have been absent from this recording session) and – thankfully – makes the vocals louder than everything else. Even the (decent) cover of Megadeth’s She-Wolf suffers from this frustrating problem

All in all, then, I completely agree with Willie: this is a very poor record, and the only reason I forfeit the 1.5 rating is because of their choruses, the solos and the decent Megadeth cover. But there is no doubt this band has a long way to go. You shouldn’t really go into a recording studio before you’re sure that you know what you are doing.

Pros:
- Good choruses
- Some good solos
- The chick can sing
Cons:
- Basic, plodding riffs
- Awful drumming
- Pitiful production
- No bass



Recent reviews by this author
Green Day SaviorsMetallica 72 Seasons
Black Math Horseman Black Math HorsemanBlack Math Horseman Wyllt
Slipknot The End, So FarPixies Doggerel
user ratings (5)
2.5
average
other reviews of this album
DaveW (4)
...

recommended by reviewer
The Gathering Mandylion


Comments:Add a Comment 
Willie
Moderator
November 20th 2007


20212 Comments


Good review... it works because we seem to like and dislike different things and find different positives.... like I didn't think the vocals were good at all...

ReturnToRock
November 20th 2007


4805 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

dude, the vocals were the best this band had going for them.



i re-read your review, how can you say the drummer is good?

Willie
Moderator
November 20th 2007


20212 Comments


i re-read your review, how can you say the drummer is good?
ha ha, I never said he was good, I said he had some good moments such as the rhythmic opening to "Hindsight (1976)". I didn't want to just rip them completely or anything since it is their first release... I wanted to try to find potential too.

I thought the vocals were the worst thing going for them...This Message Edited On 11.20.07

ReturnToRock
November 20th 2007


4805 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

dude, those drums ruin that riff even more - not that it was ever good :P



as a bass player, it pisses me off to see bands where the bass is inaudible or unimportant, too.

Essence
November 20th 2007


6692 Comments


Review warrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

TheGreatD17
November 20th 2007


1141 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

for some reason I listened to this, wondering if there was any potential here, and I seriously doubt it, they've had like four or five line-up changes this year alone and the members just aren't talented enough, even better production wouldn't save this

Willie
Moderator
November 20th 2007


20212 Comments


they've had like four or five line-up changes this year alone and the members just aren't talented enough, even better production wouldn't save this
^^^That right there should have been the summary at the top of the review because that sums things up perfectly^^^

Pebster49
November 21st 2007


3023 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Well with better productions the bass would hopefully be more audible, and not have the ,not so good, sound of the drums(it sounds like a live performance in a garage sound). I agree with this review, she has a good voice, but I think some of the riffs are decent. They need to keep a line-up so they can build from this, and hopefully get better.This Message Edited On 11.20.07

Willie
Moderator
November 21st 2007


20212 Comments


Well, even though both the reviews for this album are mostly negative, it's still getting the band exposure at least... and everyone seems to at least see potential.This Message Edited On 11.20.07

Remembrance
November 21st 2007


45 Comments


Not that great ratings.. but am probably still gonna check this out

Willie
Moderator
November 21st 2007


20212 Comments


Might as well since it's free... let us know what you think.

Remembrance
November 21st 2007


45 Comments


Yeah well i agree, with the revieuwer that already agreed with willie :P
Hmm i agreed the woman can sing, but the lyrics sound just to common in my oppinion.. And they have a nice taste for album covers... but even that feels "stolen" from better bands...
I wouldn't buy this but i think we should give people like this some time Bands like these are usually young and they still need to learn a lot... But i do get the feeling that these people are trying hard.

Remembrance
November 21st 2007


45 Comments


The: "Alerion - Female Fronted Metal with a Progressive Edge"had me laughing though.


DaveW
December 6th 2007


15 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I'm afraid I don't agree with you on this review. I think it is important to keep in mind while judging this demo, that they are an unsigned band and that this is more or less a home recording.



I have posted another review to clarify my point.



Willie
Moderator
December 6th 2007


20212 Comments


Once again... it doesn't matter if you don't agree with the opinions of the reviewers, that isn't what the voting process is supposed to be used for... it's supposed to be used when a review is poorly written or totally fails at backing up whatever points they're trying to make... neither of the other two fall into those categories.

DaveW
December 6th 2007


15 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Sorry dude, I thought an explanation/comment was what you wanted. I'm still a bit new on this community, so you'll have to forgive me if I make some small mistakes in protocol. I have the best intentions you know. ;)

Willie
Moderator
December 6th 2007


20212 Comments


I know... I'm just trying to help you out because some people aren't too delicate with their opinions on here...
Yes, I did want you to comment because if you Neg a review you should say why (although that isn't a requirement, and some don't) cause it helps the person to know what the problem was with their review.
Again, when you click "No" it's supposed to be to the question "Was this Review Well Written?"... it's not to the question "Do you agree with this reviewer's opinion of this album?"... so both the reviews you've clicked "no" to because you didn't agree with the opinion... you shouldn't have... and that goes for any others you may have done that to.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy