Enter Shikari
Take to the Skies

very poor


by Monticello USER (18 Reviews)
November 3rd, 2007 | 169 replies

Release Date: 2007 | Tracklist

Enter Shikari have made a dent to say the least. They mix “heavy” post-hardcore with a lighter side of trance music. And the British public love it. Take To The Skies reached number 4 in the UK album chart with more than 60,000 sales. They seem to be the perfect band for all the kids who want to listen to heavy music while retaining the sense of fun that one would equate with a night out at the clubs. Because they seem to be the only band to be doing this, some people would think of them as ‘revolutionary’ and ‘experimental’. While these tags may stand, they give the impression that Enter Shikari do what they do well.

Roughton Reynolds (or just Rou) handles the verbal side. He writes the lyrics and then on top of that, he takes the lead vocalist spot. He mixes together clean vocals with rougher hardcore vocals. The hardcore side of his voice, for want of a better word, is terrible. It sounds horrible and strained. It has all the characteristics of someone who shouldn’t be trying to scream like that. His scream imparts the image that if he kept on going, he would be coughing up blood into the mic, which is not pretty. His clean vocals on the other hand, are actually rather pleasant. They are nothing special but they get the job done. He has been given a decent range and he chooses to use it. The best comparison for his voice would be Rody Walker from Protest The Hero, just with more of an English accent and not quite as good. It is a shame that Rou does not just sing cleanly for the whole album, as that would make it infinitely more enjoyable. Thankfully, he forgoes the harsh vocals for most of the album, but they are still used far too much.

Rou also handles the synthesized elements on this album. For the most part, these are pretty good, if a little common. They create a good contrast to the heavily down tuned guitars. The keys, when they are there, are generally quite prominent and well mixed, rather than just having separate synth and guitar songs. The best song to listen to for the trance side would be Mothership. The song starts on the very danceable synths, which fade in and out, then become constant. It’s something that everyone vaguely familiar with trance music will have heard before. The only thing that stops people calling it generic is the mix with the heavier side of the music. This is true for the majority of the album and repeated listens really accentuate this problem, which really tends to drag after a while.

Everything else on the album is pretty useless. The guitar never strays out of its comfort zone, which restricts it to recycling riffs that have been heard literally thousands of times before, hitting drop D chords in different rhythms in an attempt to bring variety. The best riff on the album belongs to Sorry, You’re Not A Winner, which coincidentally is the best song. The triplets could be interesting, but that possibility goes out the window with the fact that they are repeated throughout practically the whole song, only letting up to allow the synths to take the spotlight and then going soft by simply palm muting in the bridge. The bass similarly falls into this rut. The only real standout for the bass is on Today Won’t Go Down In History, where it takes on the whole song by itself, creating a nice rolling intro, which is soon accompanied by Rou. After this section though, the song fails to create anything that stands out. Meanwhile, the drums never stray away from their bass and snare, only adding to the monotony of each song.

The real problem with this album is the lack of really memorable moments. There is no time where you can say, ‘oh that was a really good hook right there’ or ‘those drums blow my mind’ because there are no moments like that. Anyone who spends a reasonable amount of time listening to music will have heard most of this before, but in a different and mostly better context. Whereas bands like Protest The Hero or Refused are interesting just by the sheer amount of things they do, this band is boring because they do the same thing basically over and over again. Also, it may look like there are a lot of songs on this record, but a considerable amount of them are just instantly throwaway interludes which serve no real purpose. The imagination just is not there and it really does become a hindrance after a short time.

Kudos to the band for trying though. They are doing something relatively new, and they seem to be making a fair bit of money from it, so they can not be faulted for that. While the music appeals to the public because of its methods and adding more poppy elements to otherwise unknown post-hardcore which is something that rarely, if ever, enters the charts en masse. But to a music lover, it does not satisfy. The dull instruments accompanying the dull synths and the mediocre vocalist fail to bring something that is truly revolutionary. With a little more imagination and talent, this could have been a good album, but of course it is only their first, so they could be great. They just need to find their feet.


Recent reviews by this author
The Hellacopters Head OffAkala Freedom Lasso
The Budos Band The Budos Band IIX Japan Art of Life
Cherry Ghost Thirst For RomanceCunninLynguists A Piece Of Strange
user ratings (1104)
other reviews of this album
VikkiH (3.5)
So alot of criticism for these guys, but they're not as bad as they're made out to be, honest....

craigy2 (3.5)

WetFish (4)
Post-hardcore mixed with rave? Sounds bloody brilliant!...

Comments:Add a Comment 
November 3rd 2007


Album Rating: 1.5

I was hovering between 1.5 and a 2. I dunno, I just felt like being harsh for some reason.

November 3rd 2007


no it really is that bad.

November 3rd 2007


Album Rating: 2.5

Good review, though I disagree with your rating a little bit. The main problem I had with this cd is that, for the most part, it is just redone versions of songs from their EPs. Only 2 or 3 of these songs can't be found on their earlier EPs, which is really disappointing.

Hopefully they'll be original next time though.

November 3rd 2007


3/4 of this album is awesome, rest is severely horrible.
GREAT live, saw them last week, what a show.

November 3rd 2007


Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

Way too harsh. Not badly written, though.

November 4th 2007


Album Rating: 1.0

This album really ins't that good, they're alright live though. Wel lwritten review as well.

November 4th 2007


Album Rating: 2.0

I did NOT enjoy them live. The first reason being that their music is just dire. The other reason is that Interpol were on at the same time, and i just HAD to go with the crowd -_-


November 4th 2007


I agree with the review 100 times over.

November 4th 2007


Ted Maul > Enter Shikari.

These guys and BMTH are two of the most annoying British bands ever.

Digging: Converge - The Dusk in Us

November 5th 2007


Album Rating: 2.0

Can someone tell me why this band is so fucking hyped? Are they handsome?

So they play "post-hardcore" (yeah right, like there's anything hardcore about this music). And they incorporate fake trance that's hardly danceable (let alone listenable).

So they have an arpeggiator. and synth pads. ooo.

Oh yeah, and they're british. so now...I guess I'm supposed to care.

Sorry, had to bitch. Great review. As you can see, I agree.

November 7th 2007


so what everyone is pretty much saying is that either people love them or they hate them...i think theyre amazing

November 7th 2007


There's only one song I like by these guys, that Plan B song. One of my friends is cousins with the synth player, though, so I have to hear about how "amazing" they are all the damn time =/

Nice review. I'm surprised you aren't tagged as a contributor yet.

November 7th 2007


Album Rating: 1.5

What the hell? Who negged this?

November 11th 2007


Am I the only one that finds his lows extremely laughable? Otherwise, I can enjoy it, but when he does the lows, I just burst out laughing.

November 11th 2007


Album Rating: 1.5

I'd say he should stop screaming cause it sounds horrible but then he'd have to sing and he's no Sinatra in that department either.

November 11th 2007


hahahaha ^^

November 18th 2007


pretty awfulThis Message Edited On 11.19.07

January 17th 2008


Album Rating: 2.5

OK,Time For Plan B is one of the most boring songs i've heard in the past year.

February 22nd 2008


Album Rating: 2.0

This loses steam really quick.

Guitar work can be painfully bad at moments along with the vocals.

February 22nd 2008


Album Rating: 3.5

alright...this album is getting too much hate...i'll give it a 3.5 cause it needs some lovin' and it isn't the same generic deathcore band from cali.

You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile


Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Site Copyright 2005-2017 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy