Meshuggah
Catch Thirtythree


5.0
classic

Review

by antihippy USER (6 Reviews)
May 7th, 2007 | 34 replies


Release Date: 2005 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Meshuggah continues from their one song e.p I, and expands it to a 48 minute album. But does the formula work? Read on.

Imagine, if you will, a cold, emotionless machine. One whose only purpose is to move forward, in a straight line, destroying whatever that gets in its way. Imagine it coming, no, STOMPING towards you, breathing out smoke into the sky, while you stand still, rooted to the spot, as if hypnotised by the machine. Now, imagine it doing that in 4/4, 14/8 and 23/16. That, my friend, is Meshuggah.

Meshuggah, hailing from Umeå, Sweden, burst into the metal scene in 1987 with their brand of dissonant, harsh, polymetric post-thrash. Their sound revolves around odd time signatured and dissonant riffs, polymetric drums where every limb of the drummer is doing it's own thing, and the harsh vocals of Jens. Catch 33, released in 2005, is their 5th studio album so far.

Meshuggah is:
Jens Kidman-lead vocals
Fredrik Thordendal-lead guitar
Tomas Haake-drums
Mårten Hagström-rhythm guitar
Dick Lovgren-bass guitar

I first heard Meshuggah back in late 2005, when I clicked the GoogleVideo link to their video for New Millennium Cyanide Christ. Back then, I just started to getting into heavy metal, and even though I liked the heavier stuff already (if you call In Flames heavy :p), I still find it a very strange experience, as I look at a bunch of guys head-banging, air-guitaring/drumming, while a bald guy screams into a red pen and head-banging so hard I'm still surprised that his sun glasses didn't just fly off somewhere safer. It was not love at first sight, I can tell you that, but I definitely didn't dislike it. I became intrigued, and decided into looking more into this band called Meshuggah. In the end, like all succesfull relationships, it slowly blossoms, growing bigger with every passing day, until one day it just clicks, and you're 'doing' it right there and then on the carpet.

So, onto the album! When Meshuggah released I (which I now have the pleasure of listening to), an e.p containing a 20 minute song, they decided to experiment with this single song idea again, only this time their going to expand it into a 48 minute album. Oh, don't let the tracklist (which shows 13 song titles) fool you. For example, the first 3 'songs' shows absolutely no reason why it shouldn't just be one song. The band just seperated it so that you can get to some parts much easier.

But, since it's just one 48 minute song, does that mean that it's repetitive? While some critics may agree to that aspect, I find it rather harsh. Sure, some parts are repititive, but it's repetitive in a hypnotic way. Not in the "when i count to 3 you will fall asleep way", it's more like in a "you are under my power" way. Meshuggah also decided to try out different styles on this album, so all those expecting it to be another Destroy, Erase, Improve should just keep listening to Destroy, Erase, Improve, or just be more open-minded. Gone are the strangely time-signatured, dissonant chugga chugga riffs, replaced by groovier riffs that still remained strangely time-signatured and dissonant in their own way. A much larger focus on groove is not the only change. Tomas Haake, though he is still a legend in my eyes, is replaced with a drum machine created by Haake himself, creating a colder and more mechanical feel to the album, even though the original purpose for the replacement is because Meshuggah is pressed for time and Haake wouldn't be able to make the deadline. The rhythm guitar is pushed to the background, creating a cold and intense atmosphere with spaced-out tremelo picking. The bass, strangely, don't make its precense felt too much here, instead following the lead guitar pattern and adding a heavier sound to the already heavy sound. Jens Kidman's vocal are waaaay harsher than past albums, sounding more and more like a troll who had woken up at the wrong side of the bed, while throwing in a few spoken words as well. The album also features some long jazz-inspired ambience parts (seeing Mind's Mirrors or the end part of In Death/is Death), which slowly lulls you into its grasp.

Reading my review, it may sound like this is a massive change by Meshuggah. Did they abandon their roots? Did they come back with something entirely from the left-field? Well, I'll be happy to report, no and no. Meshuggah still sounds like the soulless machine they are, that pulverises you slowly with every song, forcing you into submission. Catch 33 does all that, they just do it with more groove, and hypnotises you while you're slowly being pulverise.

Though I find this album to be highly enjoyable, I gotta admit that this is not for everyone, at least not the first listen. To people who:

A)Don't enjoy this groovier side of Meshuggah and prefer them when they're thrashier.

or

B)Just new to Meshuggah

Trust me, persist with it. Though it might not be an easy listen, it's not meant to be an easy listen, it will slowly but surely grow on you, because, in the end, like all successful relationships, it slowly blossoms, growing bigger with every passing day, until one day it just clicks, and you're 'doing' it right there and then on the carpet.

Recommended tracks:
It's just one song, so listen to it all! Though if you want a sample of the song, listen to In Death/is Death.



Recent reviews by this author
Deathspell Omega Fas - Ite, Maledicti, In Ignem AeternumStreetlight Manifesto Everything Goes Numb
Sigh Gallows GalleryPeeping Tom Peeping Tom
Mr. Bungle California
user ratings (1975)
4
excellent
other reviews of this album
DarkSideOfLucca (5)
A difficult experience to endure, and also one of the best....

BurlySlayerFan (4)
For me, their most accomplished, atmospheric and unique effort to date....

Leadfeather (4.5)
...

Altmer (4)
...



Comments:Add a Comment 
antihippy
May 7th 2007


696 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

one of my better reviews, which isn't really hard since i've only done 3. :p

joh soxe
May 7th 2007


44 Comments


good review, interesting thoughts on what is quite a hard album to conceptualise. i was thinking just yesterday in fact that Catch 33 is like the epitome of the way in which you can enjoy an album not necessarily because of the music but because of the idea behind the music.

p.s. whilst i have nothing in principle against writing a review in informal language, i don't think there's such a word as 'submitment': try submission

kalkal50
May 7th 2007


2386 Comments


Nice review, one question before I begin to dig into this. Are the vocals a full growl?

Tarantino's Tarantulas
May 7th 2007


819 Comments


Nice review, one question before I begin to dig into this. Are the vocals a full growl?
No, they're more of a thrash bark but very aggressive. There's also some spoken vocals done by Tomas Haake the drummer on a few songs.

jrowa001
May 7th 2007


8752 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

awesome review. you did a good job displaying how this album makes you feel while listening to it. its quite a journey but well worth it at the end. i love this album, its the only meshuggah album i can sit through from start to finish. the only reason this isnt a 5 for me is the drums are so repetitive at times, i think if they had more time Haake couldve made this album a little better

Dethtrasher
May 7th 2007


2211 Comments


Ace review! :thumb:
I really liked your description about the band's music. Is this really one single track!?
Ignore my album rating, I rated this this by mistake, I have not heard anything from this album.This Message Edited On 05.07.07

XSebbyMcMuffinX
May 7th 2007


490 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

"...until one day it just clicks, and you're 'doing' it right there and then on the carpet."



I love Meshuggah and all but...

Dis_Con_Nec_Ted
May 7th 2007


5098 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

"Is this really one single track!?"



If you like polyrythmic groove orientated experiental metal with 100 % harsh vocals, this 8-stringed inferno of guitar-riffs will be the best 47-minute track of your life;)



Cravinov13
May 7th 2007


3854 Comments


I can't get into them either. IMO they're nothing special at all.

Brain Dead
May 7th 2007


1150 Comments


You guys, stop spewing blasphemy. Meshuggah own. No further analysis is needed.
Edit: Meshuggah doesn't have a bassist at this point in their career. I may be wrong, but I think they tune their guitars so low it just sounds like bass.This Message Edited On 05.07.07

GleamInRanks
May 8th 2007


298 Comments


I think they use eight string guitars or something crazy like that.

edit/ sorry, that was already established.This Message Edited On 05.07.07

Dis_Con_Nec_Ted
May 8th 2007


5098 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

do any of you guys know how the eighth string is tuned on the standard tuning of the guitar?...



on a seven-string it is B if i'm right.

Cravinov13
May 8th 2007


3854 Comments


I have no idea why I rated this album.

Slaytan
May 8th 2007


1185 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

@DirtyS4nch3z:

An eight string is tuned GBEADGBE, and yeah a 7 is in B.

antihippy
May 8th 2007


696 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

thanks for all the feedback guys! i'll try to make it a little nicer once i get the time...

Tarantino's Tarantulas
May 8th 2007


819 Comments


Edit: Meshuggah doesn't have a bassist at this point in their career. I may be wrong, but I think they tune their guitars so low it just sounds like bass.

That's what I thought but I didn't bring it up in case I was mistaken.

This album isn't a priority for me, I want Chaosphere and Nothing first (also looking forward to their next release).

antihippy
May 8th 2007


696 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

i had a chance to get Nothing but i decided to pass up because it's way too expensive. i wanted it though.



to brain dead: maybe, but they have a bassist anyway so i thought they probably used him.



i read somewhere that the bass is at the same octave as the guitars though so it would be damn hard to tell.This Message Edited On 05.08.07

Confessed2005
May 8th 2007


5561 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Great review but I prefer their other material. This is still a pretty good album though - awesome grooves to it like you said.

Dethtrasher
May 9th 2007


2211 Comments


If you like polyrythmic groove orientated experiental metal with 100 % harsh vocals, this 8-stringed inferno of guitar-riffs will be the best 47-minute track of your life.

Then I need to get this album! I have not heard anything from them after [b]I[/i] so I hope this sounds a bit more special. The thing that makes Meshuggah unique is their timing within the riff and drum work, just my opinion.

Dis_Con_Nec_Ted
May 9th 2007


5098 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

^the thing is, i just can't get enough of both 'I' and 'C33', but both are very diffrent from each other although they're both one long song. 'I' is very trashy and at times (seems) faster compared to C33; it is cause the main BPM is set at a little faster.



Compared to 'I', this is more like a dark groovy trip through some of the most evil (and in-your-face) sounds an eight-stringed guitar can produce.



I must admit, when first heard this cd after 'I', i thought it was crap. but soon after 'repeated' listens i saw the awesomeness in it. Give it a chance (or two ;D)

This Message Edited On 05.09.07



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy