">
 

This Is Hell
Sundowning


1.0
awful

Review

by CheckersOnMyShoesYo USER (5 Reviews)
February 24th, 2007 | 45 replies


Release Date: 2006 | Tracklist


This Is Hell- Sundowning
Trustkill Records
May 2006



I came across this album quite by accident. There I was, in my friendly neighborhood Barnes and Nobles, looking through the CD section. I needed some new music, and couldn’t find what I was looking for, so I picked this up on the premise of liking its cover art. I put into my car stereo, and then took it right back out. All the songs sounded exactly the same. The same lightning fast chord progression, the same harsh grating singing, even the lyrics sounded the same. This CD was Sundowning by the aptly named This Is Hell.


Now, don’t get me wrong, I love hardcore punk. I’ve been a fan of bands like Gang Green and Minor Threat and The Freeze for a long time. But This Is Hell is nothing like any of those bands. Whereas Minor Threat’s lyrics had a focus, This Is Hell shouts fire and brimstone at no one in particular. Lyrics such as, “ Our debts are paid in ink and blood for all the things we’ve said along the way/ this is a statement of our will/ we’re not going down in history for standing still” don’t really inspire me at all. Whereas Gang Green actually produced clever, interesting chord structures, This Is Hell use the same boring chugging riff, with thin hardcore lead tones on top of that. The front man, Travis Reilly, has one of the most annoying voices in all of hardcore. His “scream” sounds like an abusive husband yelling at his wife to make him some dinner. It truly is horrible.


Lets talk about the rhythm section. Oh wait, there isn’t one. The drummer basically beats the living **** out of his kit, and the bass; Oh don’t get me started on the bass. As a fairly good bass player, I was offended to listen to his lame, boring lines. Sometimes he only plays one note , repeated over and over. The guitars play relatively simple power chords, with some pick slides and hand muted chugging thrown in for giggles. There are no solos, though I’m not sure if I should be sad about that. These guitarists sound like they couldn’t do a hammer-on or a pull-off to save their lives.


For all this suckage, at least it should make you want to do some floor punching, or some other hardcore dance, right? Not exactly. The Polygraph Cheaters, the best song in this big bucket of crap, is maybe the only song that inspires me to move my head, let alone do some windmilling. Procession Commence even features Glassjaw and Head Automatica front man Daryl Palumbo doing some guest vocals. Or so they say, because I can’t hear Daryl over Travis’ bleating. Broken Teeth is the best song lyrically on the album, which isn’t saying much. “ We named this vessel hope in spite of fate/ but its taking on water at an alarming rate.” Those are the best lyrics on this album. Another thing , there are “peaceful” interludes in between all the yelling. 4.8.05 and 8.27.05 are nothing more than a few guitar chords strummed over a buzzing sound for about 30 seconds. Maybe This Is Hell was trying to lengthen their album by a little bit. It is, after all, only twenty-nine minutes. It seems like it lasts for an eternity, as one song melds into another.

Unless you enjoy a lot of chugging guitars, lifeless bass, ****ty drumming, and singers who sound like wife beaters, you will not like this band. The lyrics are completely pointless. There are no standout tracks, no distinction between one song and another. I would, however, recommend this to anyone thinking of starting a hardcore band, as an example of what not to do. Honestly, the only thing these pissed-off, no-talent punks did right is name their band This Is Hell. Listening to this album really is hell.

Pros:
Daryl Palumbo appears in one song, though you can’t hear him.
So short you don’t have to bear the pain for long.

Cons:
Everything about the music is boring and generic. All this has been done before
Singer is horrible
Pretty much everything is a con.

2/5


user ratings (95)
3.6
great
other reviews of this album
Damrod EMERITUS (3.5)
An honest, powerful and fun interpretation of Hardcore. It kicks ass, and is just a joy to listen to...

guitarplaya91 (3.5)
Pretty sold release from a up and comming Long Island HC band....



Comments:Add a Comment 
CheckersOnMyShoesYo
February 25th 2007


215 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

So uh, I dont like this review. But I liked this album less.

Intransit
February 25th 2007


2797 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Your review was okay, but it sounds like you desperately want to give this a 1 and you give no justification for it being a 2. Also, coming into this expecting old school hardcore punk like Minor Threat was probably not a good idea. As far as sounding similar, modern hardcore has alot more dynamics to it than Minor Threat or Gang Green did.



I saw this band live, and I thought they were quite good for a modern hardcore band. I'll definitely be picking this up, and if the record is as good as their live performance, I'll probably be coming out with a more positive review in the future.

CheckersOnMyShoesYo
February 25th 2007


215 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Yeah, im rethinking my rating. My review is saying a 1, but i put a 2.



Ehhh.



Edit: Ok I changed it to a 1, thats kinda what I really wanted to put anyways.This Message Edited On 02.24.07

Cadaveric
February 25th 2007


152 Comments


wow... this review is pretty off, I like this band alot.

spoon_of_grimbo
February 25th 2007


2241 Comments


i've not heard this band before, but i'm surprised at the low ratings, as this album made quite a few end-of-year best-of lists on various sites that i frequent... still, well reasoned review.

IsItLuck?
Emeritus
February 25th 2007


4957 Comments


I saw them with GlassJAw. I was not impressed.

CheckersOnMyShoesYo
February 25th 2007


215 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I wouldnt be impressed with most bands if i saw them with Glassjaw...



Thanks, whoever voted for this.

IsItLuck?
Emeritus
February 25th 2007


4957 Comments


What are you trying to say?

CheckersOnMyShoesYo
February 25th 2007


215 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Im trying to say that I love Glassjaw and not many bands could top them in a live show.

IsItLuck?
Emeritus
February 25th 2007


4957 Comments


ohhh ohh.. Good thing I asked instead of instigating. ;)

CheckersOnMyShoesYo
February 25th 2007


215 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Yeah. That last comment wasnt very well-written. I'm glad you asked.

StrizzMatik
February 25th 2007


4156 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Your review (and opinion) sucks, but oh well. I saw them with Glassjaw and they most definitely put on an energetic show. And I can think of a LOT of bands who deserve a 1 more than these guys.

Intransit
February 25th 2007


2797 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I was waiting for Strizz to weigh in on this. I'm slsking this bitch up atm, so I'll probably have a rating sooner rather than later.

204409
Emeritus
February 25th 2007


3998 Comments


Ya I think Chex is just trying to broaden his review collection. He needed a 1 or 2. See???

Pete
February 25th 2007


188 Comments


While this is nothing groundbreaking or breathtaking, it sure as hell get my white a'ss shaking.

I really should get into freestyle MC'ing, because I'm such a fvcking awesome human being.

So this album's nothing new but it's far from a bore, it's basically just standard modern hardcore.

Seeing as how the guitarists do pull-offs and the songs don't all sound the same, I'm gonna have to declare this review "really fvcking lame".

So I'm gonna vote this review not well-written, oh my god I just lost my favourite mitten

Abaddon2005
February 25th 2007


684 Comments



..This review really wasn't that bad to neg it, come on. And if you think this album deserves higher than he gave it, say that, don't neg his review.

If you can be bothered to type that his review sucks, then at least give some argumentation for it.

Intransit
February 25th 2007


2797 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

[quote=dfelon]Ya I think Chex is just trying to broaden his review collection. He needed a 1 or 2. See???[/quote]

I was thinking along those lines tbh.

CheckersOnMyShoesYo
February 25th 2007


215 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Lol DFelon you read me like a book.



Was this negged because you disagreed with my opinion? Why did my review suck? I agree its not my best review, but it cant be bad enough to be negged.

ToWhatEnd
February 25th 2007


3173 Comments


Yeah it kind of is bad enough to be negged, not like the most obvious one to neg but more of like a well if someone is really into this genre they could neg it (not just because they disagree with your opinion). You tend to make plenty of broad statements and not use specific enough examples save from the lyrics. What song(s) is the bass on playing one note? What part of the song, the whole thing? You also describe the lead vocalist in about two lines, you definitely need more detail than that. You also tend to have a few statements thrown in the review for the heck of it. Like your claim the guitarists couldn't do a hammer on and a pull off to save their soles just kinda breaks from paragraph unity and seems to be thrown in there for the hell of it. That's just some stuff I noticed, and yes of course I picked up the vibe this was done to 'balance' out your review ratings.

Cadaveric
February 26th 2007


152 Comments


This Is Hell is kewl. Unlike checkers :P



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy