CutMan: We Need To Be Able To Neg Staff Reviews

klap 10.13.12	u mad
bungy 10.13.12	WE HAFTA BRING DOWN THE MAN THEY CANT BOSS US AROUND
Trebor. 10.13.12	You can't neg the staff on any other website, why would this one be any different
KILL 10.13.12	klapforgay
CutMan 10.13.12	I just think it's a confused system, it's a community, but it's not, etc. I just think it'd be a better community if we could. I probably think you should be able to neg staff on other websites, too. shrugs I just see that I can't now and then and think "Oh. Huh. That's a shame". Mayhaps I am alone.
Calc 10.13.12	since 99.9% of staff reviews are better written then 100% of user reviews, if you feel the need to neg one but not neg almost every single other review written on this site, then it further proves the uselessness of the feature. Not sure if this makes sense but I'm not changing it
Trebor. 10.13.12	"since 99.9% of staff reviews are better written then 100% of user reviews" 60% of the time, it works all the time
Trebor. 10.13.12	Approval rating means nothing anyway, they said when you apply for contributor or when they promote people to staff they don't even look at it
ViperAces 10.13.12	Mike Stango is an idiot reviewer so negging him would be nice.
bungy 10.13.12	THE PROLETARIAN REVOLUTION IS NIGH
Cygnatti 10.13.12	I dunno who mike stango even is so...
Emim 10.13.12	That reminds me of that batarian in mass effect 2, bungy
pmmets07 10.13.12	you can still give criticism in a comment so i don't really see the need for giving a neg to someone who is clearly a competent writer.
Scoot 10.13.12	yeah but it's not like they'll actually take it into consideration
Apollo 10.13.12	"since 99.9% of staff reviews are better written then 100% of user reviews" sucking the staff off I see?
bach 10.13.12	Most people will neg on impulse because of a rating that differs from theirs' anyway.
Trebor. 10.13.12	^Yeah most people neg just based on the rating
bach 10.13.12	Also, don't forget troll negs.
WeepingBanana 10.13.12	i think the best this would just get rid of negging all together and just use the bump system like for soundoffs. if you don't like it, then don't bump it but if you think it should be the first review shown for the album then bump it and eventually the best review will be flagged
WeepingBanana 10.13.12	IT'S LIKE FREE MARKET REVIEWING
CutMan 10.13.12	WeepingBanana: That's actually a great idea.
klap 10.13.12	that sounds good in practice but then you'll get the same troll review/soundoffs getting bumped over legitimate ones. like my gy!be one
WeepingBanana 10.13.12	well i mean i think the mods provide more leniency for troll sound offs than troll reviews, no?
Trebor. 10.13.12	I think they said they've pretty much given up enforcing soundoffs unless they're really offensive or something like that
Cygnatti 10.13.12	that's because sound offs are short and sweet and occasionally very funny unlike troll reviews
klap 10.13.12	thats very true. i like that idea in general but staff reviews are always going to be featured otherwise. at least attempting to make the site look professional
Trebor. 10.13.12	I wrote the dumbest thing I could think of for my No Love Deep Web soundoff and it got 19 bumps!
Cygnatti 10.13.12	gotta be honest, shinji's soundoff for that was hilarious
Uranium 10.13.12	do staff get paid
StarlessAnd 10.13.12	""since 99.9% of staff reviews are better written then 100% of user reviews""
StarlessAnd 10.13.12	yea they receive dicks on a regular basis
Observer 10.13.12	users used to be able to neg staff reviews but dumb users abused it, hence no negging staff reviews
klap 10.13.12	cold hard cash homie
Uranium 10.13.12	min wage?
Uranium 10.13.12	oh, do they receive benefits too lol
Uranium 10.13.12	paid vacation?
Cygnatti 10.13.12	staff gets paid in dicks obvs
CutMan 10.13.12	Their dental plan is sucking the dicks they get, you see. Health insurance is similar.
Spec 10.13.12	the staff is perfect yo
Eclecticist 10.13.12	"since 99.9% of staff reviews are better written then 100% of user reviews" Staff hip-hop reviews are almost always trash. Their selections are usually pretty good but their critique leaves a lot to be desired.
Uranium 10.13.12	it sounds like a rewarding job
Snowdog808 09.01.16	I know this is really old, but I think the ability to downrate reviews is much less necessary on here as it is on Allmusic, where many of the laziest reviews known to man, staff or otherwise, reside.