Havey
06.28.14 | deftones |
ArsMoriendi
06.28.14 | Sadly, it's probably Kanye West or something equally as shitty. |
NorthernSkylark
06.28.14 | The National, I dunno |
Calc
06.28.14 | i like how everything is rock music except the 80's lol |
MyNameIsPencil
06.28.14 | My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy or something idk
|
L4titudes
06.28.14 | maybe Radiohead or QOTSA |
Trebor.
06.28.14 | Nirvana lol |
zakalwe
06.28.14 | Strokes and the countless shite that spawned from the garage band tag.
Everything post 2000 is shite.
Ahhhhh it's good to be back :D |
Calc
06.28.14 | 90's should be some hippity hop artist.
2000's should be justin timberlake/ NSync
2010's should be PSY |
crutchfieldtongs
06.28.14 | Dang,, I wish I was born in the 1600s........... |
IronGiant
06.28.14 | 90s and 70s hahahahahaha |
Skull917
06.28.14 | You mean the most commercially successful ? for 2000s probably eminem or usher or beyonce or someone like that |
OZZGabriel
06.28.14 | JOHN ANTHONY MOTHERFUCKING FRUSCIANTE |
scorpiusx
06.29.14 | Defining vs Best are two different things.
For the 2000s you could go with Outkast, Kanye, or The Strokes as the most defining. Outkast and Kanye both showed hip-hop infiltrating mainstream pop music and making a lot of genres cross-over. The Strokes really jumpstarted a lot of the garage/punk sound that existed a lot particularly in the early 2000s. The only problem is that a random person off the street probably couldn't tell you a single song by The Strokes, whereas everyone knows at least a few songs by Outkast or Kanye.
With that being said, Radiohead were the best band of the 2000s, and I suppose a case for Kid A could be made as well. |
Friday13th
06.29.14 | Nickelback |
Shuyin
06.29.14 | isis! |
YakNips
06.29.14 | Its obviously iwrotehaikusaboutcannibalsiminyouryearbook
cmon |
avonbarksdale221
06.29.14 | Creed |
Rowan5215
06.29.14 | Bomb the Music Industry |
scorpiusx
06.29.14 | Honestly for any artist to be defining of a generation, they really have to be popular. That's not to say they have the best music around, but it has to have a great amount of exposure. After all, those albums above sold quite a lot of copies. ^
With that said, here's a list I found of the top selling albums of the 2000s:
http://www.thisis50.com/forum/topics/top-100-selling-albums?xg_source=activity
Based on that I'd say Eminem is actually tops, as he's not only the best selling artist of the decade, but also because that list is loaded with really shitty music so he wins the exposure + talent race almost by default. |
YakNips
06.29.14 | thats actually a really good answer |
Inveigh
06.29.14 | Led Zepplin to Michael Jackson to Nirvana to Eminem
what a depressing fucking decline |
Funeralopolis
06.29.14 | for 2000s Strokes and the countless shite that spawned from the garage band tag. [2] |
Cygnatti
06.29.14 | Meh. Zep is overrated anyways. |
Graveyard
06.29.14 | the antlers |
Inveigh
06.29.14 | Zep's not my favorite band from the 70s by any means, but overrated is probably a little harsh
their first 6 albums are rock n roll royalty |
Rowan5215
06.29.14 | They're a great band but I'm with Cyg |
Funeralopolis
06.29.14 | still never heard a single zep song other than stairway |
Rowan5215
06.29.14 | Check When the Levee Breaks that's prob the best they got |
Inveigh
06.29.14 | it's definitely up there. other classics include Black Dog, Over the Hills and Far Away, Bron-Y-Aur Stomp, Trampled Underfoot and Whole Lotta Love |
Rowan5215
06.29.14 | Songs like Black Dog I find fairly average, their more out-there stuff like In the Time of Dying and No Quarter is fantastic though
The more emphasis on the instruments and less emphasis on Plant's vocals the better imo |
Relinquished
06.29.14 | average to what though |
Inveigh
06.29.14 | right i feel like they probably weren't nearly as average in the early 70s |
Rowan5215
06.29.14 | Average to my tastes of course, don't pay any attention to me :-) |
Inveigh
06.29.14 | lol i understand, i just have a borderline opposite take on their stuff. while i dig their more experimental side (especially on Houses of the Holy), Led Zeppelin was at their best to me when they were rocking the fuck out |
Rowan5215
06.29.14 | Yeah gotcha. They certainly knew how to rock the fuck out and Bonham, JPJ and Page ruled at it, but I like it more when they stretched their songwriting muscles a bit and also the experimental jams tend to be where I find Plant bearable more frequently |
Skull917
06.29.14 | Experimental and Zeppelin? Where did you hear that? Blues and psychedelic rock is where they're strong. Listen to that 2 hour orgy https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=edPEBB6VjRQ#t=636 |
Cimnele
06.29.14 | Riff Raff is the defining artist of the 2010s for sure |
Skull917
06.29.14 | Riff Raff [2] |
Sleaper
06.29.14 | kanye, animal collective, radiohead or riff raff |
laucha1266
06.29.14 | 2010 was defined by one direction thats for sure |
Sleaper
06.29.14 | this guy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFiqxR7s76Y |
Artuma
06.29.14 | radiohead pretty easily, ok comp (although it was in the 90s) and kid a were the ones that defined the whole 2000s |
TheSpirit
06.29.14 | Dragonforce |
Alastor
06.29.14 | If you go by commercial success and popularity it's probably Eminem/ Linkin Park/ RHCP. |
adr
06.29.14 | Pink Floyd > Zep
lol Nirvana [2] |
Wafflez
06.29.14 | Radiohead is by far the strongest contender for posterboy of the 00's award. |
Dunwich
06.29.14 | What is so "lol" about Nirvana? |
Wafflez
06.29.14 | ^2pleb4them |
GuanoBumbershoot
06.29.14 | Radiohead could probably co-own the 90's, and they're the only band I can think of that would define the 2000's. Maybe U2, Coldplay or Foo Fighters. |
kevin234
06.29.14 | I'll throw a bunch into the discussion:
The White Stripes
Kanye
Blink-182
The Mars Volta
Red Hot Chili Peppers
Foo Fighters
Coldplay
Some stupid dubstep something
|
kevin234
06.29.14 | Forgot the Strokes. |
demigod!
06.29.14 | radiohead for '00's, for sure |
Inveigh
06.29.14 | "They certainly knew how to rock the fuck out and Bonham, JPJ and Page ruled at it, but I like it more when they stretched their songwriting muscles a bit and also the experimental jams tend to be where I find Plant bearable more frequently"
yeah I know what you mean about Plant. he's nowhere near my fav vocalist of that era/style, but he was definitely better on their less rocking stuff imo
as for 90s, I understand why OP went with Nirvana. I might have gone Pearl Jam but I get the logic.
I can see Radiohead in the 2000s as they defined the growing division between "popular music" and the stuff that more hardcore music fans were listening to. It's either them or Eminem for that decade. |
Inveigh
06.29.14 | also I agree with the choices on the list for 50s, 60s, 70s and 80s completely, even if none of them are my favorite artists for those decades. at least if I'm understanding "decade defining" correctly. |
GuanoBumbershoot
06.29.14 | oh ya, fuck, Eminem could definitely take the 2000's spot. |
SeaAnemone
06.29.14 | yea I feel like radiohead is the clear winner; they satisfy the requirements (1) serves as a perfect example of growing/big trends of the decade (2) very popular (3) really really good, too |
Inveigh
06.29.14 | it just depends on how you're looking at. he was the most commercially successful of the decade, and enjoyed a solid amount of critical success too. but in the dawn of music blogs and the huge divide that separated the casual listener from the music fan, he didn't define the era quite like Radiohead. he's the best choice from the other side of the spectrum though. |
MonotoneMop
06.29.14 | I was talking to some friends about this recently. The most agreed upon artist was The Strokes, but the argument could be made for Radiohead since Kid A came out in 2000. It's iffy though, since OK Computer came out three years previous. |
Inveigh
06.29.14 | yeah, but their era of true widespread popularity was the 2000s. OK Computer was monumental when it came out, but it's legend grew massively years after its release.
I sorta see the argument for the Strokes, but their relevance was so short lived that it kind of disqualifies them in my mind. |
SeaAnemone
06.29.14 | eh, the Strokes popularized an already-pretty-widely-recognized style, and definitely didn't perfect it by any means. not really indicative of any bigger movement, either. plus, their later albums kinda murky the overall quality of their career. |
Sowing
06.29.14 | 2000s would probably be radiohead
Wish I could say it was brand new |
Inveigh
06.29.14 | lol Sowing i came in hear hoping for a brand new comment and was not disappointed
obviously i don't agree but it's not a completely illegitimate choice, as much as haters would vehemently disagree |
Inveigh
06.29.14 | bands formed in the 2000s would be Arcade Fire, maybe |
SeaAnemone
06.29.14 | yes brand new. decade defining. really invented their own sound and did it better than anyone else. achieved incredible levels of popularity. made their name known by starting a movement and many bands followed in their footsteps.
lol c'mon.
I mean if we're defining 'the world' as "AbsolutePunk" then maybe brand new were the most decade defining band of the 00s of the world. |
SeaAnemone
06.29.14 | radiohead
oh wait formed
give me a sec |
Inveigh
06.29.14 | Brand New isn't decade defining in any really flattering way, more that they just perfected 2-3 of the decades defining sounds after the fact, and spawned legions of fanboys/girls. |
SeaAnemone
06.29.14 | kanye
the national
arcade fire
the strokes
burial
animal collective
all far better choices than brand new tbh |
MonotoneMop
06.29.14 | Gorillaz were a pretty big deal during that decade. |
SeaAnemone
06.29.14 | gorillaz were a big deal for like 1 month and a few tracks let's be honest |
SeaAnemone
06.29.14 | "maybe. idk about the strokes tho"
ok |
Inveigh
06.29.14 | kanye
the national
arcade fire
the strokes
burial
animal collective
all far better choices than brand new tbh
not sure if all of those "formed" in the 2000s, but if they did then yes agreed hard. from a metal perspective you could argue Mastodon as well. |
SeaAnemone
06.29.14 | they either formed in late 99 or 00s and all released their first release in the 00s, I think |
MonotoneMop
06.29.14 | Clint Eastwood and Feel Good Inc. were ridiculously popular and were released in 2001 and 2005, respectively. Melancholy Hill came out in 2010, so it kinda bookends the whole deal. If you can consider Brand New or The National, you have to consider Gorillaz. |
SeaAnemone
06.29.14 | "lol they had two good albums"
I mean I'm not arguing for the strokes's quality (I make a strong case against them like 10 posts up there) but (a) you narrowed the field down to artists formed after 00, and (b) relative to brand new, the strokes are soooooo much more definitive of the 00s
plus all the other bands I mentioned
hence why the brand new thing is silly
very silly |
SeaAnemone
06.29.14 | and brand new is the definition of a huge discography of high quality albums lol |
Inveigh
06.29.14 | "lol they had two good albums"
who is this referring to, strokes, mastodon? |
SeaAnemone
06.29.14 | ugh I don't think we have to consider brand new or the national, neither of which are great choices (I just used the national as an example because they make sense RELATIVE to brand new)... compare any of these to radiohead and there's like no argument |
SeaAnemone
06.29.14 | "if you're considering the strokes"
omg I'm not considering the strokes I don't think anyone is
I just put that example out there because relative to BN a lot of artists make sense because it's such a bad choice |
MonotoneMop
06.29.14 | So probably Radiohead (ignoring the time issues), Coldplay or U2 or something. |
VheissuCrisis
06.29.14 | Radiohead. God forbid Coldplay end up the next on that list. |
RiffOClock
06.29.14 | whatever happens to be on the site's front page |
Skull917
06.30.14 | 50s Chuck Berry; Miles Davis
60s VU; Bob Dylan; Hendrix; Rolling Stones
70s Bowie; Sex Pistols; Bob Marley
80s R.E.M.; Bruce Springsteen; GnR
90s Nirvana; Nine Inch Nails; Fugazi
00s Arcade Fire; White Stripes |
MonotoneMop
06.30.14 | A few people said U2 (me included). Just looked up their period of activity and i'm a little bit embarrassed. |
someguest
06.30.14 | meg white changed the history of drum technique forever |
tmagistrelli
06.30.14 | serious or not i'm gonna agree with JT for 2000's, not because he is the best, but because his music is very likely to translate to 50 years from now as decade defining. especially around the futuresexx/lovesounds |
tmagistrelli
06.30.14 | along with commercial success. |
Sympathies
06.30.14 | stupid concept |
tmagistrelli
06.30.14 | i mean it only makes sense. 2000-2010 was all over the place musically, based on commercialism, but JT
always seemed to stand tall, whether it was with nsync, solo, or featured. |
MonotoneMop
06.30.14 | Smash Mouth. Their vocalist is just as relevant today on Diners, Drive Ins and Dives. |
L4titudes
06.30.14 | lol |
Rowan5215
06.30.14 | Gorillaz |
tommygun
06.30.14 | radiohead obv |
PunchforPunch
06.30.14 | uhh.. coldplay? |