insomniac15
12.05.11 | review is nicely written, but you dismiss the album and here is on the digs list ? |
insomniac15
12.05.11 | sorry, now I've seen it's not for the digs list, my bad |
insomniac15
12.05.11 | triple post! are chevelle any good ? |
Recspecs
12.05.11 | Chevelle is above-average at best. |
Trebor.
12.05.11 | You could have posted it here if you never mentioned sputnik
|
insomniac15
12.05.11 | are they the same mainstream rock style like Nickelback, Hinder, Seether ? |
Recspecs
12.05.11 | Lol no. Although some songs might be. Chevelle's older stuff is probably their best. |
KjSwantko
12.05.11 | Lol Review was pretty good. Nickelback is magnificent. |
Recspecs
12.05.11 | "Nickelback is magnificent."
I really hope you are joking. |
NateT
12.06.11 | Chevelle is damn consistent all their albums are 4's for ,e except for one which was a 4.5 |
KjSwantko
12.06.11 | Recspecs, I just wrote a review for them a couple days ago explaining why they are so good. Check it out. |
jsaf7
12.11.11 | very good review.. really enjoyed it! Thanks for sharing. |
Vespiion
12.11.11 | I love how you hammered on their marketing ploy. |
NateT
12.14.11 | yeah... it just made me angry how blatant they were in showing that they were just trying to sell records as opposed to making music. |
