|
User
Reviews 1 Approval 43%
Album Ratings 2 Last Active 07-28-11 11:13 pm Joined 07-28-11
Review Comments 58
| Theses toward a New Music
Fundamental principles aimed at the creation of a Music that is adequate to our age. We must exterminate the atavistic and anachronistic tendencies of the present epoch in order to usher in the New. LONG LIVE THE MACHINE. | | 1 | Musical production is limited by the technical means of an age.
The forms of music produced in any given age are delimited by the technologies of musical production. The symphony orchestra was impossible until the techniques required to create classical instruments had been refined to a sufficient degree. Thus, the potentialities of music (organized sound) are determined by the technical field within which they must work. | | 2 | The content of musical production is in largely dependent upon the predominant social structures.
The content of musical production is to a large extent a reflection of the social institutions and exigencies of its age. Thus, when the Church held a great deal of temporal power in Europe, most music tended to toward the ecclesiastical. This remained so up through the baroque age. During the heyday of the aristocracy, classical music provided the blue-bloods with frivolous courtly music. In the nineteenth century, when Romanticism and nationalism prevailed, hymns to the fatherland abounded (Brahms' German Requiem, Strauss' Blue Danube, anything by Wagner). | | 3 | The accidental properties of music are in large part cultural and arbitrary.
The accidental properties of music (the scales used, the time signatures employed, the existence of dissonance and resolution or polyrhythms, etc.) are for the most part a product of the particular cultures and regions out of which they emerged. These elements are initially irrational, but through their elaboration and systematization through music theory they are made more rational. Likewise, the organization of musicians into particular formations (chamber groups, orchestras, bands) evolves out of the history of musical production according to the patterns of tradition. | | 4 | Each epoch produces a music adequate to its capacities.
Based on the above, it would seem natural that each age has produced a form of music appropriate to its ideological, technological, and peculiar structures. | | 5 | The technical reproducibility of sound altered musical production significantly.
In the twentieth century, with the serialization of sound via audial recording (the gramophone and so on), music was vulgarized to such a level that it was aimed generally at "the masses," toward a "popular" audience. While live performances were still valuable, the mass reproducibility of sound through increasingly precise recording devices made innovations such as radio and eventually television great media through which music has been disseminated. The effect of sound recording and reproducibility had on music was very much the same as the effect of photography on painting and the effect of film on theater. | | 6 | Electrification and electronic amplification of sound superseded non-electrified instruments.
With the introduction of a new interface mediating between the tone produced and its sonic amplification, new levels of mediation were possible. Small bands could play to increasingly huge audiences through the increased audial output of electronic amps. The more "natural" traditional instruments were thus outmoded, except through their analogue or digital recording. | | 7 | The invention of the Moog and other synthesizers has revolutionized the possibilities of music.
With the even further intermediation of sound through digitally-contrived sounds and artificial pitch alterations, as well as precisely preset drum beats and tape loops, the sphere of musical production was yet again revolutionized. Now the organic element of music was eradicated entirely. Layer upon layer of artificial mediation was piled atop one another. The human element was reduced to a programming decision. | | 8 | Even the human voice has been rendered obsolete.
Even that most human, seemingly irreproducible component of musical production, the voice, has been replaced by artificial intonations and articulations. No longer is music a slave to the peculiarities and imperfections of the human voice. Since 1961, this has been the case, and the survival of the unaltered human voice has been that of a living fossil: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGsfwhb4-bQ | | 9 | With even further mediation, the human element of music can be further extirpated.
Through the implementation of various algorithms and modalities, a program could be automatically set to generate other programs, which in turn generate other programs, etc., each of which generate different patterns of sound. These sonic patterns would vary each in their repetition, differentiation, pitch, tone, sound, lyricization, etc. The human element in the production would be akin to the role of God in the Deist universe -- after an initial thrust or "prime movement," all else would proceed according to artificial laws engendered by the ever-changing constitution of the program. | | 10 | Music videos featuring human beings have been outstripped.
Accordingly, music videos should no longer feature human beings, but rather only depict sequences of digits or mathematical functions, or alternately factory scenes of machines producing other machines producing other machines, in a grandly-orchestrated symphony OF THE MACHINE. THE HUMAN ELEMENT WILL FINALLY BE ERASED AND HUMANITY CAN GAIN ASCENDANCY ABOVE THE REALM OF MUSICAL PRODUCTION. | |
RossWolfe
07.29.11 | Long live the age of the MACHINE. | porch
07.29.11 | mj my man how've you been | porch
07.29.11 | will read this someday | Hyperion1001
07.29.11 | Wow. | wabbit
07.29.11 | ...can someone read this and tell me if it's worth my time? | AngelofDeath
07.29.11 | Theses dumb. | Eko
07.29.11 | Mj has some time on his hands
Either way feature this please | YetAnotherBrick
07.29.11 | too many big words | coneren
07.29.11 | fuckin rights | RossWolfe
07.29.11 | Sup Porch.
and thanks Eko. This is probably the greatest theoretical contribution to Sputnikmusic (ever), and so it deserves to be FEATURED | WashboardSuds
07.29.11 | tl;dgas | Skweetis
07.29.11 | 8: That's not a good thing, and it's simply not true (as of right now) and won't come to fruition for a long time. Not sure I dig the Kurzweilian angle of all this. | Liberi Fatali
07.29.11 | This is poorly written, does not justify your main points of argument and is unsuited to its format. | wyankeif1337
07.29.11 | here we go again. | coneren
07.29.11 | on my own | SeaAnemone
07.29.11 | the return of mj.
will read these when i'm more awake.
glad to have you back, though, I guess. | RossWolfe
07.29.11 | Only Skweetis has made a relevant point.
I would be curious to see what Deviant would make of this.
Hello, Eric. | Maniac!
07.29.11 | Well that was pointless | Wolfhorde
07.29.11 | Well that was pointless [2]
| snerefedsav
08.20.11 | oh dis nigga back | RossWolfe
08.22.11 | yeah i back | wabbit
08.22.11 | do you like frank turner? | FatChickIrl
08.22.11 | What the niggs is this | AngelofDeath
08.22.11 | "and thanks Eko. This is probably the greatest theoretical contribution to Sputnikmusic (ever), and so it deserves to be FEATURED"
Making obvious observations about music while being unnecessarily verbose is somehow important? | letsgofishing
08.22.11 | Nice try, but next time you want to look intelligent, spell "thesis" right. | AngelofDeath
08.22.11 | "Theses" is the plural of "thesis". Though, each of these separately doesn't exactly merit the moniker of "thesis". | FatChickIrl
08.22.11 | Thebes | letsgofishing
08.22.11 | Definitely thought those were individual points leading up to a thesis... I see what's going on here.
sorry for the asshole comment, probably should read the list next time. | RossWolfe
08.22.11 | AngelofDeath> my verbosity is quite modest in this list
letsgofishing> the plural of "thesis" is "theses." this list has more than one thesis. hence... | FatChickIrl
08.22.11 | hence youre a fag | RossWolfe
08.22.11 | what an inference, FatChickIrl. a Euclid of our times | wabbit
08.22.11 | answer my question | RossWolfe
08.22.11 | not really, wonarabbit
who is slipping | robertsona
08.22.11 | hey rosswolfe, i suggest you check out tim hecker, he makes his machines sing like no humans ever could, or something hyperbolic like that. i actually sort of experience imagery whilst listening to his music of whirring and clicking machinery, of a new industrial age in which--caps?--THE MACHINE rules all. perhaps | Electric City
08.22.11 | this gave me a boner | RossWolfe
08.22.11 | i will check him out at your behest robertsona and if his music evokes that imagery that is a good thing
why are my lists giving you boners Electric City? is it because they remind you of Leninist electrification | robertsona
08.22.11 | for the most accurate evocation of what i have described, i would suggest Harmony in Ultraviolet
(2006). cheers! | TheFonz123
09.12.11 | o look you stated basic and standard information on the history of the music industry in the most cryptic way possible. If your like me and you actually know all these words you'd see that your'e arguements annoyingly insipid | Liberi Fatali
09.13.11 | You had me thefonz until you said:
"If your like me and you actually know all these words"
Then I laughed. | Vesper
09.13.11 | "your'e arguements"
Did you also laugh at this, Liberi?
But, really, this dude is a hack. | Liberi Fatali
09.13.11 | Missed that one, stopped reading at the point I mentioned haha.
But I'm sure he understands all these words, so I better watch what I say - he might pick up on the mocking tone. | Trebor.
09.13.11 | This is probably the worst lists ever
Mostly because he genuinely tried and is the true anti-troll | TheFonz123
09.18.11 | WHat i meant by that is he says average things in very colorful ways so that people who DON'T know these words would think hes smarter than he is. and yes i do know all these words, I said that egotistical comment to show that if you understand it, then you would'nt be impressed | Liberi Fatali
09.18.11 | Yeah but you incorrectly used your and then said your'e. Which is ironic given that you were
proclaiming to be capable of understanding and seeing through his verbose language. | scissorlocked
09.18.11 | is this really MJ? | FatChickIrl
09.18.11 | nope | liledman
09.18.11 | firstly, after all of the above points, how can you still argue that we need to push toward a new music, when it seems that it is inevitable? society keeps pushing forward, and over the last 120 years the rate of musical evolution has been huge. the atavistic and anachronistic tendencies are a result of many things, human nature being one of them. nostalgia in the arts has always had a profound effect on people. couple that with the technological advancements of the last century, and its no wonder people are sometimes transfixed by what has come before them. | liledman
09.18.11 | also
"The accidental properties of music (the scales used, the time signatures employed, the existence of dissonance and resolution or polyrhythms, etc.) are for the most part a product of the particular cultures and regions out of which they emerged. These elements are initially irrational, but through their elaboration and systematization through music theory they are made more rational. Likewise, the organization of musicians into particular formations (chamber groups, orchestras, bands) evolves out of the history of musical production according to the patterns of tradition."
how are they irrational? if anything, they are entirely rational to begin with. if they are cultural and traditional, then it is quite obviously rational. the polyrhythms of different african cultures, the microtonal tunings of middle eastern music, the harmony of the west; these things are and have been rational and natural tendencies for hundreds of years, even thousands.
"systematization through music theory"
i wouldnt necessarily say theory systematizes anything. it provides an analytical and educational perspective on what is already put into practice, sure, but it still remains an analysis on what has been done in music, not a regulatory system to be adhered to. its evolutionary nature is directly against that idea. | liledman
09.18.11 | "With even further mediation, the human element of music can be further extirpated."
you seem to be forgetting the most important part about music.
the listener. | liledman
09.18.11 | im not sure if this is some drunken rant or just a poor attempt at an argument... (is there an argument?) | TheFonz123
09.18.11 | I agree with liledman, culture changing is going to happen whether you like it or not, but you seem to think change is a bad thing. Vulgarity still happened before the change you mentioned:it just happened outside of songs. But that's simply becuase it was taboo to do so in movies/music. But that has more to do with social changes then say, music. As a species we are constantly changing, and evolving. it's part of being an animal on earth. It seems you have more a problem with change than anything. Quantum physics showed the smallest things can harness energy and endorsed attention to detail(among other things). That field helped us progress a long with some of the things you mentioned. Are you going to make a pretensious list stating that quantum physics is indeed a change in the last 200 years?
edit: I accidentally mispelled a word in a comment I wrote in 20 seconds lol dude that speaks nothing of my ability to spell the word. Your arguement is invalid, and by saying that you question ANYONE who has made an arbitrary grammar mistake on this site becuase of not caring means you questions pretty much everyone on this site, becuase everyone does it, most likely including yourself. |
|