Polyethylene
11.18.12 | As a Bond film it was inferior to Casino Royale, for it strayed from the norms of the franchise a surprising amount, but as a standalone film it was amazing. Great acting, classy action, a totally unhinged villain, and one hell of a sexy French lady.
Seen it? |
Atari
11.18.12 | dude adele knocked that song out of the park intro was sweet |
Polyethylene
11.18.12 | Yeah I was a little worried when I heard she was going to be singing this time round, but she nailed it. Everyone nailed it. Damn that finale had my heart pounding. |
Atari
11.18.12 | haha yeah it was pretty good i guess that adele song is on the radio but luckily i hadn't heard it until i saw it in the theatre. honestly not a huge pop fan but she really did nail it. |
controlled
11.18.12 | i thought it was boring. highly anticlimactic which sounds oxymoronic |
Polyethylene
11.18.12 | It was much talkier than a lot of Bonds and it wrapped up very quickly yes, I didn't see those as big negatives though |
InFiction
11.18.12 | As long as it's better than Quantum of Solace, I'm down. |
Gee
11.18.12 | Probably my favourite bond film ever. I never liked Craig as bond before this. |
Polyethylene
11.18.12 | Much better than Solace, as good as Royale but for different reasons. Yeah I always liked Craig, but he really grew into the role in this one. He felt elemental, almost like Bond was written for him. |
GnFnRs87
11.18.12 | Movie was amazingly good. Javier Bardem stole it but Craig more than held his own, I love his more grittier portrayal as a human Bond |
Polyethylene
11.18.12 | Yeah me too, I love the suave and smooth-talking Bond (Jon Hamm would make an awesome replacement) but dark and icy works awesome too. Javier was creepy as hell! |
Polyethylene
11.18.12 | Not just in being all homoerotic, when he took out his top layer of teeth I just about spewed... ewwwwwwww |
VermicideReloadead
11.18.12 | It was good but not my favorite james bond film, much better than solace but I prefer casino royale |
Havey
11.18.12 | It ruled yeah |
apert
11.18.12 | still not as good as Sean Connery era but best since goldeneye maybe since Moore era |
oWhoadYo
11.18.12 | It was decent, very cheesy and predictable at times. The villain was atrocious, he was so generic and forced. They tried to cash in on the insane bad guy who is unpredictable and mentally unstable, but it just turned out stupid and very un-Bond like. The movie also lasted waaaay to long for its own good. Oh yeah and the dialogue was incredibly stale and boring. It was so hard to give it my attention at most parts. But the action scenes were so fucking awesome it didnt really matter.
The ending sucks too. M Dies, she gets shot and she dies and Bond cries like a bitch. It was so lame. |
Atari
11.18.12 | Don't spoil the ending dumbass |
oWhoadYo
11.18.12 | What ending? The one where M dies? |
anarchistfish
11.18.12 | "As a Bond film it was inferior to Casino Royale, for it strayed from the norms of the franchise a surprising amount,"
yeah but that's what made it good
2nd best bond film behind casino royale |
menawati
11.18.12 | it was ok, prefer the lower key films where he's actually more of a spy than an action-hero tho |
J0ckstrapsFTW
11.18.12 | Saw it a couple days ago and it ruled. |
VermicideReloadead
11.18.12 | Silva is not a bad villian, in fact I liked that character. |
