">
 

Ulver
Rehearsal


2.0
poor

Review

by Lambda USER (69 Reviews)
December 27th, 2010 | 23 replies


Release Date: 1993 | Tracklist


Everything has to start somewhere. When listening to early fragments from a band's history, we often have to step back in time and look at it from that point of view rather than judge it based on their future works. "Rehearsal" may be the earliest available recording by seminal black metallers/experimental pioneers Ulver, created in 1993 before the release of their "Vargnatt" demo. This record features, fittingly, two early versions of songs from that demo: "Vargnatt" and "Ulverytternes Kamp." Both share the same basic characteristics: snarled vocals, hypnotic guitar riffs (both clean and electric,) along with pounding, jackhammer-esque drums. All of these elements come together to create an atmosphere of cold, almost like standing on a snow-covered hillside with a constant wind blowing at you.

The recording quality on here is, by all accounts, terrible. It is quiet, muffled, and drowned in low-end, with nearly inaudible drums and poorly mixed vocals. Musically it features some fairly impressive guitar work, particularly the solo on "Vargnatt" and the opening riff in "Ulverytternes Kamp." Garm's vocals here are nowhere near what they were on Ulver's debut album "Bergtatt;" he takes to snarling most of his lines (similar to his style on the "Vargnatt" demo) which gets a little grating after a while. Thankfully this is only a 10-minute tape, as that combined with the abysmal recording quality would render this almost unlistenable were it much longer.

This is by no means a bad release. As a rehearsal tape it serves its purpose, and it provides a fascinating look at Ulver during their earliest period. The bottom line is: if you aren't already a fan of the band than there's little point in checking this out, but it is an early demo that Ulver enthusiasts may want to have a listen too.



Recent reviews by this author
Faith No More Sol InvictusFinch Say Hello to Sunshine
Dog Fashion Disco Sweet NothingsCasualties of Cool Casualties of Cool
fresh beatZ The MisunderstoodAvenged Sevenfold Hail to the King
user ratings (9)
2.2
poor


Comments:Add a Comment 
ShadowRemains
December 27th 2010


27744 Comments


Don't get me wrong, this is by no means a bad release.


2.0
poor


?????

Yazz_Flute
December 27th 2010


19174 Comments


There's some awkward/wordy sentence structure in the first two paragraphs and you contradict yourself a little at the
end.

Doubt i'll ever check this out but Bergtatt is a classic.

Lambda
December 27th 2010


2654 Comments


2/5 isn't "bad" for me, at least as far as this goes. I can't really give it more than s 2... this was a hard one to rate.

I changed the first paragraph a bit... I didn't really find it too "wordy" but I agree there was a little unnecessarily filler here and there.

Irving
Emeritus
December 27th 2010


7496 Comments


Aside from the bit that Shadow Remains pointed out, this is a solid body of writing. Have a pos, and try to do what you can about the missing album art.

Dryden
December 27th 2010


13585 Comments


Lambda is going to get stabbed

Terrifyer
December 27th 2010


3403 Comments


moaning about poor production on a demo itt

Wizard
December 28th 2010


20510 Comments


Dumb review is dumb.

Relinquished
December 28th 2010


48725 Comments


really pointless

Lambda
December 28th 2010


2654 Comments


How is this review pointless when there were no other reviews of it? And I would hardly call mentioning the production is bad twice in the review "moaning."

Jesus.

North0House
December 28th 2010


1764 Comments


Ulver's awesome. Always has been, always will be.
However, I can see where Lambda's coming from. I mean, even if they were good back in '93, production quality can kill a release, no matter how good it may be.

Hawks
December 28th 2010


87307 Comments


Alright if this isn't bad for you then give it a 3 and not a 2. That makes no sense really.

TAB
December 28th 2010


467 Comments


Review in one sentence. There's this one band called ulver and they're first demo has shitty production, 2/5.

Lambda
December 28th 2010


2654 Comments


Since when does 2/5 = bad? Sorry, maybe I'm missing something.

I always considered:

0 - Sewage
0.5 - Abysmal
1 - Terrible
1.5 - Bad *******
2 - Poor
2.5 - Average
3 - Mediocre
3.5 - Above Average
4 - Great
4.5 - Superb
5 - Perfect

foreverendeared
December 28th 2010


14720 Comments


lol you do realize that average = mediocre right?

Hawks
December 28th 2010


87307 Comments


Alright if we go by your ratings, 2 means poor, which also means it's not good, but you say it's not a bad release. Makes no sense.

climactic
December 28th 2010


22742 Comments


moaning about poor production on a black metal demo itt


Lambda
December 28th 2010


2654 Comments


1.5 - Bad
1.5 - Bad
1.5 - Bad
1.5 - Bad

2.0
"This is by no means a bad release."


Hawks, 1.5 means bad to me. I can't really make it any clearer than that :S

Hawks
December 28th 2010


87307 Comments


Alright I know what you're saying, but it still doesn't make sense because when people see a 2 around here they automatically think the album blows. I sure as hell do.

Lambda
December 28th 2010


2654 Comments


True. This was just a tough thing to rate, I can't really give it a 2.5 but a 2 feels too low. It's like a 2.3-2.4.

Hawks
December 28th 2010


87307 Comments


You should definitely bump it up to a 2.5 or possibly 3.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy