Sleater-Kinney
Path of Wellness


2.0
poor

Review

by eureka USER (14 Reviews)
June 12th, 2021 | 21 replies


Release Date: 2021 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Path of weariness

Sleater-Kinney’s newest effort, “Path of Wellness”, seems constantly in conflict between wanting the slickness of major-label pop rock and the harder punk-influenced style that brought them acclaim on records such as 2005’s “The Woods”. However, because the album tries to have it both ways, it ends up sounding indecisive and sadly generic. I’m not sure if the absence of former drummer Janet Weiss is to blame or if the eventual decline in musical quality that comes with a band’s age has reached Sleater-Kinney, but something seems genuinely amiss with this collection of songs.

The title track starts competently enough, with layered vocals riding atop a rhythmically complex drumbeat and a tastefully restrained electric piano backing. Prominent electric guitars enter the instrumentation near the 1:30 mark, adding a moderate sense of urgency to the track. Unfortunately, it never fully delivers on the climax that the guitars suggest and instead peters out with the instrumentation of the intro with a somewhat tacky synth lead. The track’s real shortcoming, though, is in its confusing lyricism – the titular refrain suggests positivity, though the confusing choice of words in the verses seem to blunt any attempts at inferring meaning from the song.

“High in the Grass” exemplifies the aforementioned conflict between amped-up rock and cleanly-produced pop that mires the record. This song kicks off with uncomfortably over-compressed guitars that build for nearly 20 seconds before giving way to a simplistic and unexciting instrumental palette for the verse. Corin Tucker’s falsetto in the verses sounds quite awkward; while not strained, it sounds incongruous with the rest of the song. The chorus manages to be forgettable, with a fuzzy guitar backing not quite adding the aggression it seems to imply.

“Worry with You” does not fare much better, for many of the same reasons. While it is certainly an improvement over the two preceding songs, it succeeds mainly because it serves as a reminder of the band’s older material instead of as an indicator of progression. “Method” is one of the weakest tracks on the record – the vocal delivery sounds particularly off here, seemingly in search of a weak melody. Except for Brownstein’s and Tucker’s vocals (I can’t discern which of the two takes lead) I wouldn’t otherwise be able to discern that this song was by Sleater-Kinney. “Shadow Town” is a marked course correction, and its guitar work is decent relative to that of the other songs on the album.

The rest of the album remains in the same gear; beyond the uninsightful commentary of “Complex Female Characters”, nothing quite sticks. Ironically, after listening to “Path of Wellness”, I came away with an impression more suggesting of a dying ember instead of a positive return to form. Nothing on the album is particularly bad (except maybe “Method”), but even the best songs on it still pale in comparison to the band’s older work. The cleanly-produced sound of this and the preceding record don’t hold up, and hopefully the band’s next effort will course-correct back to a rawer sound. In the meantime, though, the band seems to remain on an artistically unwell path.



Recent reviews by this author
Alan Vega, Alex Chilton, Ben Vaughn Cubist BluesThe Glands The Glands
DJ Seinfeld MirrorsLow Hey What
Lambchop ShowtunesDoss 4 New Hit Songs
user ratings (52)
2.5
average


Comments:Add a Comment 
eureka
June 12th 2021


56 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

This one was quite difficult to write - it's not quite flamethrower-worthy (e.g. my Peel Dream Magazine review), but I definitely didn't enjoy listening to it. Trying to get more practice with articulating moderately negative criticism, so any constructive feedback is appreciated

SandwichBubble
June 12th 2021


13796 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

Not as bad as the last one, but so much more generic, agreed on that front. The only song on this that emerges from the 2.5 swamp is the awful first single.

SharkTooth
June 13th 2021


14921 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

"Sleater-Kinney’s newest effort, “Path of Wellness”, seems constantly in conflict between wanting the slickness of major-label pop rock and the harder punk-influenced style that brought them acclaim on records such as 2005’s “The Woods”."



Basically my issue with this direction SK is in, SK is not very good at the pop rock stuff, it just sounds neutered to me. I wish they went back to the aggression of their earlier works, or gone in a completely weird direction, right now they just seem to be playing it safe too much

ShadowRemains
June 13th 2021


27741 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

hi carrie write good riffs again kplzthx

Trebor.
Emeritus
June 13th 2021


59835 Comments


I forgot they even had an album in 2019, one before that was great

SandwichBubble
June 13th 2021


13796 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

The Sleater-Kinney reunion experiment, despite the strong start, was ultimately a failure. Sad.

Minushuman24
June 13th 2021


4994 Comments


It is unbelievable how hard this band has slid

hamid95
June 14th 2021


1185 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

it ain't bad, but man is it mellow

hamid95
June 14th 2021


1185 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

at least tcwh took risks

RedRightHand
June 14th 2021


223 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Absolutely goddamn dreadful

SharkTooth
June 14th 2021


14921 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I'mma check this out to see if it's bad or if it's just bleh like the singles

SharkTooth
June 14th 2021


14921 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

ngl high in the grass is p good

SandwichBubble
June 14th 2021


13796 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

It's got 3-4 okay songs.

Don't really understand how anyone can say this is worse than their last one. That one was a smelly dumpster fire, this is just boring.

Pajolero
June 15th 2021


1421 Comments


Infinite respect for both Carrie and Corin, but I'm with Janet on this one. Shit sucks.

brandontaylor
June 16th 2021


1228 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

nothing remotely catchy or interesting on this one. shame the last two albums sucked bc no cities to love was really promising

Slex
June 16th 2021


16523 Comments


I bet this sucks so bad lmao

mvdu
June 20th 2021


992 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

The songs are enjoyable but it doesn’t sound like them very much. No crushing guitars here.

GmemberKills
June 20th 2021


4315 Comments


can't believe they fell off so hard after the come back. I thought they sounded so energized and inspired on No Cities To Love, and Live In Paris

Nitroadict
August 26th 2021


204 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Terribly bland album. Take a lap.

Dewinged
Staff Reviewer
January 19th 2024


32020 Comments


lets see if the new one starts a redemption arc cause damn... what a roll of disappointments



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy