Oddzar
Ready the Chariot


2.5
average

Review

by Trey STAFF
August 10th, 2009 | 18 replies


Release Date: 2009 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Conventional mainstream metal that tries to be something different, but weak choruses and mediocre riffs never allow this to happen.

Breaking into mainstream metal is a lot harder than it might seem. The biggest problem (besides fickle fans) is that bands are rarely judged on merit and instead live or die on the marketing budget of their label. Basically, if the label pays to plaster your band name all over the internet and radio than the unwashed masses will flock to you regardless of talent or quality. If on the other hand you’re on an indie label, self-promoting, or your major label just doesn’t give a *** than you have to be a little bit more motivated. The best way to do this is to do something that sets your band apart from the masses. Unfortunately, shooting for mainstream acceptance also means that there’s not much you can do to set yourself apart without also losing the mainstream sound. It’s with that in mind that kudos must be given to Maryland’s Oddzar for at least trying to infuse their mainstream metal with a bit of innovation – even if it’s not really enough to make a difference.

The album begins with a song that shows a lot of promise. Its main strong point is that it is built in such a way that it is able to flow from more conventional rock sections into edgier, riff-oriented parts creating a slightly more epic feel than there really is. This allows the song to segue from quick guitar harmonies into clean melodic riffs as well as include a fast break in the middle while still utilizing a strong catchy chorus that fits with every section. “Dogs of Demikhov” is the only other song to really display the same level of promise. In order to get to the good part of that song, though, you must first wade through nearly three minutes of standard radio rock. After the opening few minutes, the song moves into a slow, melodic, moody section that slowly builds back up before climaxing with a strong chorus and ending with a quick punky section. Unfortunately, the rest of the album doesn’t show nearly as much promise.

For the most part the album is conventional alt. metal full of moderately paced songs that are built around catchy choruses and uninteresting riffs. The only appealing parts seem to occur when the band tries to move away from the more conventional sounds and structures of mainstream metal. The chief way they do this is by including sections within each song that might comprise something a little more moody or heavy or simply more musically unique. The problem is that the weak choruses and conventional riffs that they inevitably return to generally ruin these attempts. The only other appealing parts of the album come about when the band blatantly emulate an outside influence such as the quick atonal Voivod-ish section near the end of “Calling Out” or the many references to Tool that are scattered throughout the album. These elements do show a desire to do something different – to a point – but that desire is quashed by a steadfast adherence to all of the most conventional aspects of mainstream metal (or alt. metal).

With two albums now under their belt it might be time for the band to break from the confines of their current sound because they’re not doing themselves any favors. Oddzar have a lot of good musical ideas from the guitar harmonies to the song structures themselves, but an abundance of mediocre riffs, weak choruses and a general lack of good ideas ruin their effect. This leads to an album full of songs without an identity, and without any compelling reason to ever come back to them. Their only saving grace is the occasional standout section that may briefly appear during a song, but at this point there’s too few of them to make it anything other than another face in a sea of faces.



Recent reviews by this author
Einar Solberg The Congregation AcousticBlackbriar A Dark Euphony
Mechina Blessings Upon The Field Where Blades Will FloodFilter The Algorithm
AVKRVST The ApprobationRay Alder II
user ratings (2)
2.8
good


Comments:Add a Comment 
Willie
Moderator
August 10th 2009


20212 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

What do you write about a band that's lacking any defining elements?

Tyler
Emeritus
August 10th 2009


7927 Comments


Oddzar I won't listen to this.

CompanionCube
August 10th 2009


977 Comments


hahaha awesome

Roach
August 10th 2009


2148 Comments


Oddzar I won't listen to this.



greg84
Emeritus
August 10th 2009


7654 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I know they aren't very original, but still I enjoy this album. I think the first part of the cd up to the title track is really good, if not great featuring catchy Tool-inspired hard rocking riffage and fine vocals. The remaining four songs are quite unimaginative and forgettable though. This certainly would be an excellent EP, yet it's a shame they didn't have enough solid material for an equally strong LP. They have potential so I wouldn't count them out.

Willie
Moderator
August 11th 2009


20212 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

There were enjoyable parts, but I had to sit through so many boring parts to get to a few moments of quality. The opening song is really good and I was hoping that was the foundation the album would build on, but it didn't. I'm not counting them out, but after two albums I would say I'm "concerned".

Shrew_Biter
August 11th 2009


4 Comments


Just a little something that disturbs my eyes:

Summary - 2nd line, 4th word from the end, allows - allow (we're talking plural here )

Haven't gotten to the review yet though, will check it out

Willie
Moderator
August 11th 2009


20212 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

It should disturb your eyes. I'm not sure how I missed that.

KebertXela
August 11th 2009


367 Comments


Hah these guys used to play at my school when I was in High school...and at my friend's house. They used to have an Asian guitarist that was pretty sick...I wonder if he's still in this band.

BallsToTheWall
August 12th 2009


51216 Comments


Shitty nu-metal i'm assuming.

KebertXela
August 12th 2009


367 Comments


Shitty nu-metal i'm assuming.


When we were in high school they had an old incubus kinda sound to them. As a matter of fact, I remember them playing an incubus song or two in my friend's basement.

greg84
Emeritus
August 12th 2009


7654 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Not really shitty and not really nu-metal. They're playing hard rock with some prog rock influences.

Willie
Moderator
August 12th 2009


20212 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

They're not shitty, just not interesting. I'd describe them as a cross between Tool (before they started writing 10 minute songs) and Staind.

BallsToTheWall
August 12th 2009


51216 Comments


Hmm. youtube doesnt appear to be a fan of these guys. I love Diecast so i could probaly listen to this.

Willie
Moderator
August 12th 2009


20212 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

It's been a while since I've listened to Diecast, but I don't think they're anything alike (isn't Diecast basically metalcore?).

BallsToTheWall
August 12th 2009


51216 Comments


Well Diecast's last album which is my favorite is basically hard rock with metalcore eleemnts. While throwing in killer harmonies, solos and the occasional beatdown. Listen to Fade Away or Nothing I Could Say. Epic...

Willie
Moderator
August 12th 2009


20212 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

This is basically hard rock with some of the rhythmic ideas made popular by Tool... no metalcore or breakdowns and very few harmonies (except for the opening track).



I'll give Diecast another shot.

Tits McGee
August 17th 2009


1874 Comments


Oddzar I won't listen to this


amazing



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy