Falloch
Diabolus


2.5
average

Review

by starboystargirl USER (1 Reviews)
March 16th, 2020 | 10 replies


Release Date: 2020 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Experimentation, but at what cost?

Falloch mask their inability to decide on a style by nonchalantly reminding their fans that experimentation is the heart of their creativity. They mentioned this on the release of their polarizing 2017 art-rock exercise, Prospice and it rears its head once again for their 2020 effort Diabolus.

Far removed from Blackgaze, Post Metal, or Avantgarde Rock, with no label, marketing, or even merch available; Diabolus is touted as an album written, recorded and mastered in 2 days. The release is exclusively digital and is comprised of 3 tracks, poorly mastered with a variety of audio irregularities. The worst example being the organ throughout Sanctus. While the melody is powerful and dismaying, frequent sound popping occurring at regular intervals prove that one bar was recorded and was simply looped it for nearly 10 minutes straight. Clipping is the second big offender on Diabolus, occurring any time the guitar and drums perform anything more pronounced than slow cords and doom beats.

In terms of musical quality, the album is average. Diabolus is a gritty, loud and corrosive attempt at funeral doom, sludge and black metal. It works at times, but the hurriedly nature of it all becomes apparent in many sections. Sanctus is too long and audio problems notwithstanding, repeats its one bar over and over before an anticlimactic ending. The Attilla-esque vocals on Oriens Splendor are a nice addition but are only used once during the entire record and most of the guitar passages are simple distorted cords that are repeated ad-nauseum.

How are we to interpret Diabolus? Is it a legitimate attempt at recording something eligible for “true” credibility? Or a hastily glued together project compiled to remind people of Falloch’s existence? If you visit Bandcamp’s metal section, you will find plenty of bands replicating this sound, in a more imaginative way, making it hard to justify a purchase.


user ratings (6)
2
poor


Comments:Add a Comment 
XXMurdaBeatzXX
March 16th 2020


67 Comments


Good review. I'm dissapointed to hear about the poor quality of the album. I expect better things from Andy Marshall

starboystargirl
March 16th 2020


686 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Actually, Andy left after their first output to focus on saor

zaruyache
March 16th 2020


27362 Comments


and he jumped ship as soon as it was clear he couldn't save the project lel

starboystargirl
March 17th 2020


686 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

RIP

Gnocchi
Staff Reviewer
March 17th 2020


18256 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Isn't this an EP? Or is Apple music fucking with me again.

zaruyache
March 17th 2020


27362 Comments


3 songs/28 mins, you decide.

starboystargirl
March 17th 2020


686 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

They called it a new album on their facebook post, but its 28 minutes so idk. I guess it depends how you classify an EP

Gnocchi
Staff Reviewer
March 17th 2020


18256 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I'd probably go with the band's classification on the matter - it's just Aplle's tendency to slap anything on everything which irks me. Similar to most metal albums getting lumped in as 'hard rock' because the coding is stuck in the 50's re; genre tags.

teamster
March 19th 2020


6220 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

I listened to this thinking has to be some sort of joke. Huge letdown. I dig every previous album. I just don’t get it.

parksungjoon
March 20th 2020


47231 Comments


This band is still around huh... Could never make it through either of their first two



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy