David Maxim Micic
Who Bit the Moon


2.5
average

Review

by ramon. USER (54 Reviews)
March 9th, 2017 | 47 replies


Release Date: 2017 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Tunnel vision.

There is a subset of progressive metal that remains relatively undisturbed; one that is surrounded by waves of tireless fanboys and their musical sensibilities. It is progressive metal that makes you "feel". It combines mainstream production technique, layers of reverb, and triumphant chord progressions to elevate your soul to undiscovered echelons of fulfilment. Polyphia, Plini, current Intervals, Sithu Aye, and arguably the kingpin of the bunch, David Maxim Micic, are all out to get you feeling tingly inside as you weep by your newly abandoned guitar. It's unfortunate then, that the man behind the universally acclaimed Bilo 3.0 that was key in popularising this craze would go full circle, aping the ideas he inspired. Who Bit the Moon sounds like every happy-go-lucky prog record released in the past five years without the prog, and while it is definitely a competent piece of music, I'm hard-pressed to say it does anything more than the absolute minimum.

I was exactly twelve minutes and fifty-three seconds into this album when I realised nothing interesting had happened. In fact, the minute-long "Beaver Moon" interlude proved to be my wake-up call and still remains a highlight of the album regardless of the fact it is just a warped vocoder piece with a few oddities scattered throughout. Unlike any other song on the album, it sounded hand-made, rather than manufactured. I didn't get the sense I was listening to the product of tried and tested formulas, rather an imprecise result of quiet experimentation. Follow-up track "697 Days" might just be the biggest offender on the album. It's a repetitive slog through recycled ideas and bland instrumentation. Synths and patches sound stiff and stale. There is no actual indication that I'm listening to anything remotely close to progressive, and that's the very element that made Micic's music so enthralling to begin with. It is structurally sound, yes. But so are infomercial soundtracks. It seems like Micic is aiming low with Who Bit the Moon, and it is unfortunate given the nuggets of gold dispersed amongst the noise.

Production is always a divisive topic in metal, with many claiming surgical precision to be somewhat of an antithesis to metal's volatile roots. While I typically beg to differ, Micic proves repeatedly in Who Bit the Moon that polishing every element can be a huge detriment to attempts at an emotional payoff. The aforementioned stiffness isn't just evident in the chosen patches; this album sounds too damn clean. I just have to return to "679 Days", a song so surgically precise that I struggle to imagine how it even exists in Micic's largely spontaneous discography. Especially when the mammoth title track makes an appearance at the very end and reminds us that Bilo 3.0 was no accident. There is a refined edge to the overall timbre of the song, yes, but an increased usage of traditional instrumentation and less of a reliance on nailing every take pushes the song well beyond the majority of the material on display throughout this album. It in no way warrants a 10-minute runtime but it spruces things up enough to be relatively engaging.

This wouldn't be a Micic record without some chugging. By and large, this comes in the form of "Damar", possibly the only song on the record that could truly deserve the "progressive" tag. An eerily human lead synth bounces up and down over a three-note riff with surprising success. While the song flow is easily the worst on the album, it is undoubtedly the most entertaining piece in the packet. There is a bizarre tonal change midway through the track that seemed to serve no other purpose than creating a false sense of grandeur. Even with this kept in mind, the rather adventurous attitude of the track makes it attractive. A shame then that the poor structuring and unnecessary shift in style prevent it from necessitating any room for replayability. It is captivating on first listen, even through its flaws, but I feel no desire to return to it. The fact that possibly the most complex riff on the entire album consists of no more than three notes is also a tad disappointing.

Here lies the main flaw of Who Bit the Moon. It feels like the product of tunnel vision. As if every song was written bar by bar, beat by beat, recorded and edited meticulously second by second. Micic is on autopilot. It is never apparent that this album wants to push the envelope in any regard. There are glimmers of hope scattered throughout but if this is any indicator of things to come, Micic isn't performing for the progressive scene anymore. His kooky aesthetic and cutesy fan interactions never worried me at first, what with the success of Destiny Potato's debut offering, but the emphasis on musicality has been almost entirely usurped by lukewarm pandering here. The choice is his; reinvigorate or settle for less. Until he makes that blisteringly clear, it is difficult to find much in Who Bit the Moon to truly appreciate.



Recent reviews by this author
Wilderun EpigoneCroy and the Boys Of Course They Do
Sleep Token SundowningWilderun Veil of Imagination
Brian Blade LandmarksOh, Sleeper Bloodied/Unbowed
user ratings (90)
3.6
great
related reviews

Bilo 2.0

EGO

Bilo 3.0
trending rock albums

Dark Matter

War

Blackstar

Gold


Comments:Add a Comment 
ramon.
March 9th 2017


4182 Comments


Vacation caused a bit of a delay with this review. If this album suited the purpose of matching some sort of visual medium (game/film/etc), it might've worked a little better. Standalone, there just isn't enough substance. Thoughts?

Check it here:
https://davidmaximmicic.bandcamp.com/album/who-bit-the-moon

SteakByrnes
March 9th 2017


29728 Comments


"There is a bizarre change tonal change midway..."

I assume that you don't need that first 'change' in there, but other than that this a great review. I might check this out, I've never heard of this guy

bloc
March 9th 2017


69990 Comments


I keep hearing about this everywhere and have no idea what it is, I'll give it a listen.

ramon.
March 9th 2017


4182 Comments


thanks steak. would recommend checking out his earlier stuff first. this isn't the best starting point.

bloc, you listened to micic before?

SteakByrnes
March 9th 2017


29728 Comments


No problemo bro, and I'll probably start at Bilo and go from there. It sounds like something I'd enjoy, I dig progressive instrumental music like Polyphia and whatnot

DinosaurJones
March 9th 2017


10402 Comments


I like Destiny Potato, lol.

Bilo is pretty dece. I dunno, I appreciate the talent of the dude, but I just have trouble getting into the music, I guess.

bloc
March 9th 2017


69990 Comments


Nope, I don't even know how to pronounce that name lol

PostMesmeric
March 9th 2017


779 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Man, I really really liked this album. WAY more than David's past work.

OwMySnauze
March 9th 2017


2523 Comments


Didn't even know this came out. Gotta check it out.

JJKeys
March 9th 2017


1322 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

It's good stuff, but yeah it doesn't touch anything from Bilo 3.0

HarryBoBerry
March 10th 2017


620 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I really like what he was shooting for. Your review was well done but I enjoy the feels regardless.

Calc
March 10th 2017


17339 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

looks like bilo 2.0 will remain this guy's best since he aint going back to that sound anytime soon

ramon.
March 10th 2017


4182 Comments


I don't give 2.0 enough credit. That release rips. Yea I'm pretty nervous about his trajectory, here's to hoping he has a revelation sometime soon.

Mythodea
March 11th 2017


7457 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

great review, mind pos'd. I find it to be pretty accurate. Up till 687 days, the album is just filler to me. I liked the elctronic approach of EGO/ECO, and I love the production style, but this is underwhelming because it lacks any edge. It's just muzak for elevators. Listening to the rest of the album now.

Mythodea
March 11th 2017


7457 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

Who bit the Moon is indeed the best one off the album, with a great violin-guitar duet, interesting ideas and (indeed) more natural sound. The eastern element gives it a more ''royal'' vibe, if sth like that coul be said. But this song alone (while indeed is magnifiscent) can't justify the rest.

ramon.
March 11th 2017


4182 Comments


exactly. i'd be willing to slap a 3, even 3.5 if the whole album was up to par with the t/t but that just isn't the case

Mythodea
March 11th 2017


7457 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

well, t/t is by far the best on this and is one of the best songs he's written recently, but is simply not enough.

AtomicWaste
Moderator
March 21st 2017


2888 Comments

Album Rating: 3.2 | Sound Off

I am the biggest Micic fanboy, but this review rules and is accurate - imaginary pos, contributor guy!



I have a boatload of faith that David will surge back with his next offering. EGO was kinda lame too (whlie ECO rules), so I reckon he's just working through some stuff.

Mythodea
March 21st 2017


7457 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

he needs to experiment and that's just fine. It's no wonder he went for the polished sound, given that this is his first LP, that maybe he treats as sth more serious. But I do love that guy and I'm sure I'll be listening to sth glorious from him again.

iambandersnatch
April 30th 2017


1935 Comments


i think part of this rating is bc of what he did before, if it was someone's first stuff it would probably be getting .5 higher reviews. Still yeah, it's not bilo



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy