TesseracT
Polaris


3.0
good

Review

by Thompson D. Gerhart STAFF
September 15th, 2015 | 522 replies


Release Date: 2015 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Tesseract risk nothing with an effort that neither impresses nor disappoints.

At some point in time - and I guess that time may as well be now - someone - and I guess that someone is me - had to ask whether or not post-2011 Tesseract is really just a front for Acle Kahney and Amos Williams to audition to write the backing track to hypnotherapy sessions. While I enjoyed the saxophone solos and lounge chair ambient groove on 2013 precursor to Polaris, Altered State, I had no clue that it truly signaled Tesseract's transformation into the Kenny G of groove metal, but here we are. Hindsight is 20/20, I suppose.

Simply put, Polaris is both inoffensive and uninspiring. It's a product of crisp production and tight songwriting based on an approach that takes a minimum of risks. There are a few low grooves that stand out - primarily those in more aggressive tracks "Dystopia" and "Hexes" - but the majority of the album's rhythm bleeds together from cover to cover with little melody to deviate from the monotony. Speaking of which - the return of vocalist Dan Tompkins, to paraphrase Shakespeare, appears to have ultimately resulted in a lot of sound and fury that signified nothing. While Dan is a strong vocal talent who has shown his power and range as a singer, on Polaris, his notes are mostly buried beneath a musical base not tailored to his vocal talents.

Allow me to explain. Ashe O'Hara, the band's vocalist on Altered State, had a range roughly half an octave higher than Tompkins, which allowed his melodies to soar the extra mileage needed over the same sort of polyrhythmic riffing heard on Polaris. It helped that there was more melody and vocal-instrumental interplay on Altered State, too, but the fact of the matter here and now is that Polaris does not feature Tompkins soaring over a sea of wavy low-end and time signatures - it features him slogging through it like a swamp. It's not without effort on his part (Dan is an exemplary vocalist and has talent to spare), but Polaris is tonally and rhythmically set up to mire him.

So, without the draw of Tompkins' lauded return, what's left? Well, most songs on Polaris are long or at least feel long. The majority clock in at over five minutes and fill the gap with atmospheric drawls that feel neither exciting nor boring. There are a few moments of "shout-y" vocals derived from nu metal (on "Hexes," for example), which grab you by the ear, but at the same time, the groove becomes so repetitive that the positive and negative offset. "Survival" has a cool sounding intro and verse, until it gets hit with the same "we get it, your guitar has eight strings" chorus groove that overwhelms the mix and fends off any interloping attempts at melody. "Tourniquet" features some lush harmonies, but the beat behind it is basic and Dan's leads take no chances.

Do you see the pattern yet? If not, let me introduce you to the song patterns employed on Polaris: atmospheric introduction, slow build, crescendo, a few grooves, a chorus or two, a few grooves that may or may not be the same few grooves from before, decrescendo with a low-end fill, slow atmospheric outro. Generally the "few grooves" will see some brief rising and falling action - about one peak and slope per groove if we were analyzing this as a literary structure - and there are some deviations here and there ("Utopia" for example, features a false ending and some of Dan's Faith No More impersonation!), but for the most part, the standard rhythm of a band that centers itself on odd timing creates both a confusing juxtaposition and a bland base for this musical concoction.

If you're just in it for the low-end, though, Acle and Amos have you covered. There's little in the above paragraphs that should deter you in your pursuit of bass-y goodness and, if you haven't figured it out by now, you'll be getting plenty of it as your main course with heaps falling over into your side dishes. It's tight, well-executed, and raises a few eyebrows here and there, but to be entirely honest, it doesn't have the spice needed to satisfy my palate after the well-seasoned Altered State.

For the fans, this will pass. Polaris is well-produced (even if the bass is dialed in several clicks too high), decently written, and properly executed for what it is. Critically speaking, however, it takes few musical risks and fails to launch any sort of vocal or instrumental melody, relegating it to a position as the sort of album you could take or leave in an artist's discography - a veritable recommended reading no student without the passion to pursue a PhD considers for more than a moment. Yet given the lack of any real flaw in its execution, it's easy to continue to expect great things of Tesseract. Hopefully their next album will deliver on those expectations instead of skirting by on the bare minimum requirements to be considered "good."



Recent reviews by this author
we broke the weather we broke the weatherDevin Townsend The Puzzle
Le Grand Plastic JazzSteven Page Discipline: Heal Thyself, Pt. II
Coheed and Cambria Vaxis I: The Unheavenly CreaturesDeafheaven Ordinary Corrupt Human Love
user ratings (719)
3.4
great
other reviews of this album
clavier EMERITUS (3.5)
"I am as constant as the northern star/Of whose true-fixed and resting quality/There is no fellow in...

crashandridemusic (3.5)
Either one of the best albums of the year, or one of the most underwhelming......



Comments:Add a Comment 
theacademy
Emeritus
September 15th 2015


31865 Comments


love the structure of that first sentence (altho i didnt understand what it meant in the end lol)

AtomicWaste
Moderator
September 15th 2015


2888 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Thanks acad! haha

I am prepared for so many people to disagree with this.

I really can't ding it under a 3.0, but I find so much regression in this album with Altered State so close in the rear-view mirror.

Stream Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kkl7CiCghVI

Toondude10
September 15th 2015


15184 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

https://erixantoine.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/wrooooong.jpg

AtomicWaste
Moderator
September 15th 2015


2888 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Altered State >>>>>>

ElegantElephant
September 15th 2015


1391 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

huge fan of the band but totally agree, I really like some sections here but everyone save for Amos is holding back

I also actually dislike Messenger making it the first tesseract song I dont enjoy

Toondude10
September 15th 2015


15184 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

after reading this, this feels like a 2-2.5 review considering how much you put this down.



it's a good review, but the rating doesn't really fit. it's probably just me though. :/

AtomicWaste
Moderator
September 15th 2015


2888 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Like I said, I don't feel like I can knock it below a 3.0. It's well-executed for what it is, but it's not anything better than the bare minimum of "good."

Drummerboy123
September 15th 2015


3118 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

'let introduce you to the song patterns employed on Polaris:'



Bit of an error 'let me introduce'



Great review tho, even though I disagree.

Toondude10
September 15th 2015


15184 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

fair enough I guess



also:

"While I enjoyed the saxophone solos and lounge chair ambient groove on 2013 precursor to Polaris, Altered State,"



don't know if you meant to do that in the ending of that sentence but if you did I don't get it.

CaimanJesus
September 15th 2015


3815 Comments


the Kenny G of groove metal

ElegantElephant
September 15th 2015


1391 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

yea i suggest leaving it at '2013 precursor, Altered State'



two titles together in italics make it look like one album title to me

AtomicWaste
Moderator
September 15th 2015


2888 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Bit of an error 'let me introduce'



Clearly, this never happened! :D (Thanks for the catch)



"2013 precursor to Polaris, Altered State,"



Altered State is the precursor to Polaris. It was released in 2013. What don'tcha get?



EDIT: I'm against removing Polaris in this sentence because "precursor" then has nothing to latch on to and becomes undefined. Personally, I don't see any issues with the way it is right now, though I did toy with this phrase late in the process and I do appreciate the feedback.

silenteye
September 15th 2015


22 Comments


Crap, I never thought of the album this way until I read the review. Now I hear exactly what you mean.

Toondude10
September 15th 2015


15184 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

ah okay, I get it now, the italics are messing with my head.

TalonsOfFire
Emeritus
September 15th 2015


20969 Comments

Album Rating: 2.7

I suppose this is their weakest release? That's disapppointing, I was hoping they'd progress from Altered State.

AtomicWaste
Moderator
September 15th 2015


2888 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Yeah, the formatting is eating punctuation a little bit, but not much I can do with that.

Toondude10
September 15th 2015


15184 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I guess I'm more of a "Dan fan" (hurr hurr). I'm pretty sure I'll drop this to a 3.5 but I still liked this more than Altered State, a lot less boring moments on here. That being said, I was kinda hoping for a bit more atmosphere on some tracks.

AtomicWaste
Moderator
September 15th 2015


2888 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I love Dan - I really do, especially with Skyharbor and on their first album. He's the first and only singer I've seen them with live, and he's great. But this album is not tailored to his voice in the way that it needs to be. It sounds like they wrote it for Ashe, which I guess is a possibility.

Toondude10
September 15th 2015


15184 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

You check out Voices from the Fuselage yet?

AtomicWaste
Moderator
September 15th 2015


2888 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

You checked out Voices from the Fuselage yet?

Nope, haven't had time - been listening to this since Saturday and V comes out on Friday too! Busy, busy. Will find time, though.

That's disappointing, I was hoping they'd progress from Altered State.

Me too. I thought that really showed a flash that indicated a big leap was coming.

Crap, I never thought of the album this way until I read the review. Now I hear exactly what you mean.

Sorry!



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy