">
 

The Velvet Underground
VU


4.5
superb

Review

by Robert Crumb USER (49 Reviews)
February 5th, 2005 | 16 replies


Release Date: 1985 | Tracklist


Released: Verve/Polygram; 1985

Human beings are very good at losing things. We lose socks, we lose hair, we lose money, we lose our dignity, youth, virginity, minds, hearing, and sometimes we lose ourselves. But that’s all shit. Who needs those things? Is it a travesty to grow old and fall apart? Nah, not really. I think we all know the truth and point of this exercise:

The real travesty is losing music.

It’s no longer presumptuous to thrust phrases like “artistic prescience” upon the Velvet Underground. It hasn’t been for quite some time now. The indelible imprint of the Velvets on the face of alternative/punk/art/underground music isn’t just chronicled. It’s part of the fucking ten commandments. So if we start talking about “great lost Velvet Underground albums,” does that mean there’s a whole other set of commandments? Thou shall not ignore thy leather-coated forebears even more?

VU isn’t the quite that eleventh commandment but a close facsimile. Observers and obsessive followers of the Velvet Underground have been scraping together the remains of what would be “the great lost Velvet Underground album” for quite sometime (and posthumous compilations have made them quite successful in their searches.) VU is just a fragment of a larger work, albeit an essential fragment. The tracks that comprise VU represent studio sessions between the recording of The Velvet Underground and Loaded. The fourth Verve/MGM album, presumably for which these songs as well as four other tracks were recorded, met the same fate. We got Loaded instead.

In a lot of respects, the recordings that comprise VU are the missing step between The Velvet Underground and Loaded. Of course, the real missing step between the self-titled and Loaded was Maureen Tucker, who was absent from the Loaded sessions. As such, one might look at VU as Loaded if Maureen Tucker didn’t have a baby on board, if the rifts created by the band’s business hadn’t already reached a critical mass. Perhaps the best way to illustrate is by the track “Ocean” which was recorded both during the sessions captured on VU as well as the Loaded sessions.

The Loaded “Ocean” is fragrant; Lou Reed sounds almost hammy slurring his whispering croon just loud enough to overcome string arrangements as well as the short-lived return of John Cale, who provided an organ overdub and implied his viola’s drone upon the track. In comparison, the VU “Ocean” features Tucker’s unmistakable percussion and a different Reed delivery. Even the lyrics are different. Throughout the song, Tucker’s cymbals crash like waves on some lonely shore only to give way to a thunderous kick at the song’s last gasp. This primitive crush is what the Loaded “Ocean” lacks, instead relying on an understated elegance. Furthermore, while Billy Yule was not an incapable drummer, his drumming sounds sterile and predictable in comparison to Tucker’s unique style. Let’s not even get into the solo-Reed “Ocean.”

“Foggy Notion” is easily another standout track on the collection. Dozens of live versions exist on various official and un-official bootlegs as the track became a live staple but outside of the fantastic Peel Slowly and See box set and An Introduction to the Velvet Underground (which I’ve never seen,) a definitive recorded version is elusive. “Foggy Notion” is as essential a Velvets song as any, right up their along with other energetic bangers like “What Goes On” or “Sister Ray.” Like both those tracks, the key to “Foggy Notion” is its raw energy and simplicity. The primeval rock and roll lunge is classic; Lou Reed’s breathless vocals try to keep pace with Doug Yule/Tucker’s rhythmic dance and Sterling Morrison plays an excellent foil to Reed’s seething licks. Like I said, essential.

VU also extends the balladry, a primary focus on The Velvet Underground. Continuing the lineage of “says” songs, “Stephanie Says” and “Lisa Says” are lovely little songs from another perspective along the lines of “Candy Says.” Both are wonderfully bittersweet; “Stephanie Says” is arguably the better of the two and features a clean violin (viola?) and a twinkling xylophone. Reed is in top lyrical form here, “People call her Alaska,” Reed notes in the chorus, closing the song by extending the metaphor: “It’s so cold in Alaska.” Another outstanding line: “Stephanie says/That she wants to know/Why it is, though she's the door/She can't leave the room.” Both these songs, along with a majority of songs on VU, were appropriated early on in Reed’s solo career. Reed’s solo versions for the most part stand in the shadow of the Velvets versions.

One of the few songs that doesn’t reappear with Reed is “Sticking With You,” one of those rare Maureen Tucker moments. Like “After Hours,” “Sticking With You” initially features her timid vocals, later joined by Lou and maybe Doug Yule doing backing vocals. The track is a completely left-field pop-duet, certainly not something that White Light/White Heat Velvet fans could foresee. It’s cheerful, warm and downright sweet. “Heroin” it is not.

“One of These Days” fills a similar mold as “Sticking With You.” It’s a brilliant country tinged rocker, complete with a Reed falsetto that kills me every time I hear it. Along with “Temptation Inside Your Heart,” “One of These Days” displays Reed’s affixation beyond rock and roll. The studio chatter on “Temptation” betrays the source of the influence; Morrison says, “Mo-town!” and “You don’t look like Martha and the Vandellas!” in between cheeky cross talk from Reed who mutters the eternal phrase, “Electricity comes from other planets,” before whipping into a solo. The voices are completely unnatural on the track and ends with Morrison asking, “Was that awful?” No, not really. Not their best track but good fun in any sense.

If you like the Velvet Underground to any degree and don’t have these tracks in some form, you are severely missing out. From the straight forward hard rock of “I Can’t Stand It” to the powerful crunch of “Foggy Notion” to the endearing “Sticking With You,” VU is part of the influential Velvet Underground canon. It’s nearly, if not as important as any of the proper releases. Too bad it all got lost.



Recent reviews by this author
Times New Viking Rip It OffCaribou Andorra
Lee Hazlewood Cowboy in Swedenof Montreal Hissing Fauna, Are You the Destroyer?
OutKast IdlewildJohn Cale Fear
user ratings (196)
4
excellent


Comments:Add a Comment 
Med57
Moderator
April 25th 2005


1002 Comments


Tell me about it. :upset:

*slopes off to cave*

Anyway, this is a brilliant album...it says a lot that this review lives up to the quality of it, but seriously, excellent review.

masada
June 23rd 2005


2733 Comments


So, uh, Crumb...how's it goin'?

*slowly pulls knife from behind back*

Good review...

Buddy.

The Nu-Spawn
June 5th 2006


97 Comments


good review Velvet Underground ROCKS!

El_Goodo
September 11th 2006


1016 Comments


Stephanie Says and Temptation are two of my favourite VU songs.

dudeinthepassinglane
October 8th 2006


192 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Great review, just great couldn't have said a thing better myself, and this is my fave-or-rite band. Period. No one tops em. The Beatles wish they'd tried a little noise, but they didn't because the Velvets had this on lockdown.

dudeinthepassinglane
July 11th 2007


192 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I finally got this album; I hadn't when I commented last.



It's great, good enough to give it a 4, but as far as VU albums go, I was a lil disappointed. I think it lacks a cohesive feeling.



I was also hoping for more John Cale. But his influence on his two songs in this album is nothing like it was on WL/WH or Nico.



And does anyone know if the boxed set is worth purchasing?

thinbrownduke
September 26th 2013


7 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

OK, sue me, but this is my favourite Velvet Underground record, and in my Top 10 of all time.

NorthernSkylark
August 20th 2014


12134 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

this is such a great record

StallionMang
March 25th 2015


9003 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I feel like this paired w/ the 1969 s/t would've made a fantastic double album, with this being the more "electric" side and the other being the softer "acoustic" half

Frippertronics
Emeritus
March 25th 2015


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

or maybe just this, because the s/t is fine the way it is

NorthernSkylark
March 30th 2015


12134 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

don't u know something, she said it right back

Supercoolguy64
March 30th 2015


11787 Comments


sometimes i wish i could be like a super mod so i can go fix all these � errors in old reviews

parksungjoon
June 25th 2020


47231 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

only one page in 15 years



shameful

parksungjoon
June 25th 2020


47231 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

if you havent heard this you should fix that

Pheromone
January 20th 2021


21335 Comments


nah

ArsMoriendi
February 26th 2023


40965 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Deff stronger towards the end



Temptation Inside Your Heart, Andy's Chest, and I'm Sticking with You are all 5/5s







You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy