Owl City
Shooting Star

No.

Album Rating: 2.5

No?

Album Rating: 3.0

Maybe.

Album Rating: 2.5

I don't know.

"What did you think of this review? Like it? Hate it? I'm open to any feedback to help me improve."

I like your enthusiasm for feedback, but a line like that should go in the comments instead of the review.

First paragraph isn't needed.

You're over a year late to have a summary like that, since The Midsummer Station was released over a year ago. Unless you wrote this a year ago and are just now getting around to posting it.

i want him to make that skramz album he was talking about already that would be so tight

A lot of work can be done to this, and one review per day please.

I think it's a good place to start! just a few tips for improvement:

"I was so excited to pick up this EP. I downloaded it, put my headphones on and listened and expected the abstract lyrics about reality and mysteries of life that I loved."
Making sure it's crystal clear who you're talking about here would make this a lot clearer. I like the enthusiasm, but try to remember you're writing for an audience. Would somebody who's never heard of Owl City understand what you're talking about here?

"Maybe it's because every song on here except for Dementia was written with other people. Shooting Star was written by Adam Young and 4 others, Gold wasn't even written by Young, and Take It All Away was written with 2 others."
Context would be nice. Is Owl City usually known for writing his own songs? Talking about the impact would make this analysis more meaningful, too: how does it change the quality of the music when the songs are written by other people? Is it less creative? Less sincere?

"Okay so now we move onto the rest of the EP and we hope it'll top Shooting Star perhaps."
Personally I try to stay away from the "we" in reviews (unless it's used to make a thematic point - one example would be "We all fear death, but Owl City tackles it with a refreshing sense of optimism") but that's up to you. Steering clear of it helps you maintain an objective/fair tone that makes you a more trustworthy reviewer.

"If this EP has given us a peak into what The Midsummer Station is, I'm wasn't sure I wanted to know what the rest of the songs off of that album would give me. At least I didn't hear I'm Coming After You on Shooting Star (EP), otherwise I wouldn't off gotten The Midsummer Station at all."
A little proofreading goes a long way! Read your review out loud and see if you made any typos or used any wrong words.

All in all, I like the conciseness and your lovely conversational tone - now try and apply these assets to a more in-depth analysis. A decent start overall, and I hope my feedback was helpful!

also note what hogan900 said, quality over quantity! : )

I read your other review though, and you showcased what you can write pretty well. And why thank you step ;D

Album Rating: 2.5

Thanks for the feedback; I'll remember this and try to apply it next time!

Album Rating: 2.5

I ended up going back and editing it myself, taking out what I wanted to and adding things I felt were necessary. I'll probably do that to all of these reviews just in case I find something I don't like. Thanks everyone!