Metallica Master of Puppets
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
MrKite
October 21st 2006


5020 Comments


like a page or something ago he said in all he probably spent 20 hours.^

Two-Headed Boy
October 21st 2006


4527 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

What the fuck does being a "veteran" have to do with anything? What, just because I don't go around bullshitting people like all of you, now all of a sudden I'm the worst user ever?


Grow a pair and come back with a decent response.

metallicaman8
October 22nd 2006


4677 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

The tbt is stupid long. You obviously put a lot of effort into this, so I will vote. But I do think the little skit parts were unnecessary to say the least.




Those were for people who enjoy concept reviews. You didn't have to read them.



Anyway, you get a pos because you're one of the only original reviewers on the site, and most of the time you're original ideas are good. most of the time.




Thanks, I think. Mr. Kite was correct it was roughly a twenty to twenty-four hour effort.

bicepman4000
October 22nd 2006


246 Comments


:-O twenty four hours! Dude, take a crap and get some sleep
I know you don't mean straight, but it would be funny to think you did this in one big hit

metallicaman8
October 22nd 2006


4677 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I know you don't mean straight, but it would be funny to think you did this in one big hit




I did spend six hours straight on it on Friday. I even peed in a jar so I didn't have to leave the computer. Well, no I didn't, but I might have if I had a jar.



Zesty Mordant
October 22nd 2006


1196 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Were some of the reviews of this album removed recently?

MrKite
October 22nd 2006


5020 Comments


yeah to zesty mordant. and also hahahahahaha to mm8 and bicepman/

carney3110
October 23rd 2006


310 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Personally, I don't like any of the reviews but the overall and the track-by-track, but I'm gonna vote yes because those two were great, and you get points for working your ass off on the rest of them.This Message Edited On 10.23.06

metallicaman8
October 24th 2006


4677 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Personally, I don't like any of the reviews but the overall and the track-by-track, but I'm gonna vote yes because those two were great, and you get points for working your *** off on the rest of them.




Hmm, that's odd so far no one has been overly fond of the TBT, but thanks for the vote anyhow :thumb:. Furtheremore, when I get the time I"m going to add a short TBT that's more of a highlight type thing and call it "SHORT TBT", then change the other one to "LONG TBT", as a select minority seem to have liked the long one, but more people prefer highlight type dealys *end massive run-on sentence*

Drunken Viking
October 24th 2006


1023 Comments


The last thing you need to do is add more to this review. If anything take out the tbt all together.

metallicaman8
October 24th 2006


4677 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

The last thing you need to do is add more to this review. If anything take out the tbt all together.




No.

metallicaman8
October 24th 2006


4677 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Yes.

metallicaman8
October 24th 2006


4677 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Why?




Because this reviews whole idea is to have something for everyone, so that whoever reads can pick a style of reviewing they particularly enjoy. Now, some people have said that they did like the big TBT, but some have said that when writing a TBT it's better to just highlight some of the songs best parts. So, I can only assume that in the future when people cross paths with this review there will be some who prefer shorter TBTs to the long ones. I'm going to right one so that when they do cross paths with this review...it'll be there.

Zesty Mordant
October 24th 2006


1196 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

why were some of the reviews of this album removed?

Zesty Mordant
October 24th 2006


1196 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

what, i said "why"?

Bfhurricane
October 24th 2006


6283 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

probably because this album has so much controversy around it that everyone feels like reviewing it, thus there being so many damn reviews that they probably limited them to only the good ones.

thats just my guess but i dont really care

Zesty Mordant
October 24th 2006


1196 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

oic

MrKite
October 25th 2006


5020 Comments


do what you want with it but i would advise turning the huge tbt into a smaller one cause this review is already fucking huge.

metallicaman8
October 25th 2006


4677 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

You should just replace the huge-ass t-b-t with the shorter one. But whatever.




I see your poinr, Chan, but if I get rid of the big TBT then the people who enjoyed the big TBT will have no more big TBT. Atleast one person has mentioned liking every part of the review, so every part will stay as this reviews purpose is to please everyone. I won't be taking anything off, just addding on.



cause this review is already ****ing huge.





What's your point? How long the review is has nothing to do with anything, except for the awkwardness of scrolling through it, which isn't really all that important.

AnyColour74
October 25th 2006


1054 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

yeah this is like 7 reviews, but its good that way. keep the tbt



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy