Album Rating: 2.0
mental vortex, manic impressions, extravasation, victims of deception and rust in peace were released in the 90s
|
| |
Yeah, but I'm generalizing. Plus, I believe most of those were released at the beginning of the 90's. From '95 to 2005, it was mostly shite.
Of course, that applies to bands that went mainstream. Those who stayed underground did some good stuff in that era.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
'Yeah, but I'm generalizing.'
Well don't do that.
|
| |
yea, up until about 94 thrash was impeccable
|
| |
I said XXI century, but I can't deny the 90's rules for thrash, even though I don't like it
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
early 90s ruled
|
| |
I find it interesting to look for general trends in music. However, I'll
admit that the appreciation of those trends is always limited by
subjectivity.
|
| |
I thought subjectivity and objectivity were like taboo words on the site now
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
This album was to me at least as bad as Point of Entry, and of course they both sound so pathetic in comparison to Sad Wings, Stained Class, and Painkiller.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
point of entry is better
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
There's really a song called Cyberface? tha fuck
|
| |
Everything up to PK blasts this into oblivion for me.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
yeah this is bad
|
| |
at least Jugulator had Burn in Hell
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
"Yeah this is bad."
It's too bad it seems we lost the Sad Wings, Stained Class, Defenders, and Painkiller Priest for two freaking decades.
|
| |
The bigger they are, the harder they fall.
Although it seems Rush has defied that norm to some degree.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
nostradamus is quite better than this
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
@dannyboy89 Yes, Rush really pulled off a consistant discography. Even their worst albums are pretty good.
@facupm Indeed, and I thought Nostradamus was just average  .
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
This album is a disgrace, in all honesty.
|
| |
A 1.5 that Mike gets right for once
|
| |
|
|
