">
 

Metallica
Kill 'Em All


1.0
awful

Review

by Drunken Viking USER (20 Reviews)
August 31st, 2006 | 138 replies


Release Date: 1983 | Tracklist


WARNING! There are jokes posted throughout this review, if I say a line such as this is the worst album ever created take that with a grain of salt, it's most likely a joke. Do not, DO NOT bitch about anything like that in the review.


I can see it now, I finally get why people give Master of Puppets a 5/5 rating! It's so obvious, they listen to Kill 'Em All then Master of Puppets and it must sound like pure gold. I mean MoP sucked, but KEA is just, well its hard to put into words. Before I come off as to much of an asshole, I'll try to write a short bio of the band. Up to this point Metallica were a nobody. They weren't very successful; not a whole bunch of people liked them. As VH1 put it they were to metal for the punk clubs, and to punk for the metal clubs. This hybrid of metal and punk created something huge, something revolutionary. Thrash Metal. Some of the biggest names in music today are thrash, Metallica, Megadeth, Slayer. Sound familiar? Thought so. Now '83 was an odd year; the days of Flower Power had been long gone, and Glam Metal was all the rage! Metallica hated, HATED Glam. They thought it was horrible. They set out to make something much different from it, they wanted to completely kill Glam. This brings us to the album in question, tentatively named Kill 'Em All. Now I'm no music expert, but I can safely say the Kill 'Em All is the worst piece of music ever created. Just kidding. Or am I?

Metallica's Kill 'Em All is a very rough album. The production is really not very good, and makes the vocals sound like shit. James' voice sounds really high pitched, like when you suck the helium out of a balloon, only his voice doesn't run out after a few seconds. And, to top it all off, he has this annoying reverb put over it. At points it can have a semi-cool effect like on Jump in the Fire for example, catchy rhythm and the reverb actually makes it work. But besides that the production is mediocre. The mix is ok, the leads are highlighted, and for the most part all of the instruments are heard equally. Especially the bass, Cliff is often heard chugging along (only with fingers).

Now, for the guitars. Reused, recycled, uninspired riffs. All of the songs sound the same, or at least relatively close. Half the time I'm surprised that a new song started, then to my bewilderment it was actually 3 songs :o. Kirk's solos were really nothing to hard, and they mostly consisted of the same 3 things; fast picking, minimal position changes, and slight bends with few exceptions (e.g. The Four Horseman). They lacked pure emotion that metal and music in general is in dire need of. Much of the time his solos sound like just shredding with effects put on, mostly a wah-wah pedal. Now this can fit, but it also tends to make a lot of them indistinguishable from each other. Hetfield is also brutally average. His rhythms leave much to be desired, predictable chord patterns. James fails to distinguish himself as a unique player. His lack of variety really hurts the band negatively, the majority of the rhythms are based around low E chugging with Power chords thrown in on the 3rd or 4th beat. Now this can be good when used sparingly, but when every song consists of it, it starts to loose its appeal. The lack of this also makes certain tracks drag on.

The bass and drums are also not very special either. I know, but yes I insulted the amazing bassist Cliff Burton, who in all honesty was average. Well maybe that's a bit of an understatement but I don't see how he gets al the praise he recieves. Yes, I did listen to Anesthesia (Pulling Teeth) and thought that while it had its moments it wasn't anything more complicated then an average John Myung bassline. Cliff isn't even in the same league as Lars K. Norberg (Spiral Architect), or Steve Harris (Iron Maiden). I will say this however, Burton does have some good moments, a few of his basslines are pretty decent, but I don't think that his style complemented James/Kirk's as much as it would have on say The Black Album. Not to say that they don't fit well in places, but the majority of the time he follows the guitar, and it's really sad because given a better drummer and Cliff playing rhythm he could've been much better. As for Mr. Ulrich, well there isn't much to say about him, simply because he sucks. I'll try not to be to harsh, but I really can't find to much I like about him. If I had to pick one it would be he doesn't over complicate the music :/. He has an incredibly generic style. His fills all sound very samey, and he to often reuses the same beat for most of the song. I can think of many places where not so much a blast beat, as more just a faster beat would work wonders.

I talked a little about the producing before, but I'll go a little more in depth now. The guitar tone is pretty weak, the strings sound incredibly floppy, like if the guitar was downtuned a few steps and Kirk and James were using very thin picks. I know that's really vague, but it's hard to explain. The vocals, like I said have some sort of weird reverb effect on them, causing them to really annoy me at points. It's like when someone says something in a huge room, then it echos everywhere, imagine that only each one is harmonized, and has an extremely annoying tone. The bass' tone and the drums sound fine. The aren't flat or anything. And best of all they don't sound like they've been Pro Tooled to hell (obviously seeing as how it's '83, before Pro Tools was invented).

Lyrics are definitely one of the low points of this album (and considering how bad this album is that's saying something). For example Seek and Destroy's opening lines of "We are scanning the scene in the city tonight/ We are looking for you to start a fight/ There is and evil feeling in our brains/ But it is nothing new you know it drives us insane" are just utterly pathetic. Or the even worse Whiplash's "Bang you head against the stage/ Like you never did before/ Make it ring, Make it bleed/ Make it really sore/ In a frenzied madness with your leather and your spikes/ Heads are bobbing all around/ It is hot as hell tonight" are just, simply put terrible. But I'd say Hit The Lights, "Your know our fans are insane/ We are gonna blow this place away with volume higher/ Than anything today the only way/ When we start to rock/ We never want to stop again" take the cake as worse lyrics by Metallica. Overall if these guys would talk more about different issues, and stop trying to be so Metal and badass, it would ultimately help. As Tommy Lee Jones once said, "You can't be the metal guy all the time, I mean yeah it's fun to be that guy but if you don't have soft side then you're fake." of something close to that.

Overall my thoughts for this album are, DO NOT BUY THIS ALBUM, EVER DON'T EVEN DOWNLOAD IT! I don't care if the local record shop is giving away free copies of it (though I doubt that'd happen, seeing as how Lars would sue them in an instant) just walk away. Don't look back. Kill 'Em All is filled with really dull riffs, horrible lyrics and drums, and average bass and below average vocals. And yes, that was a joke so don't take it seriously. My honest opinion of this album is that it sucks. It has a few moments, but to me it's just a bad Thrash Album. At least when I look at say Master of Puppets I can say I don't like that but it's a decent Thrash Metal album, but with this I can't even say that. Yes it's Thrash, but for all the praise this gets I really don't see it.

Just for the sake of tradition

Pros
- Kinda original
- Slight moments of clarity
- It's Metallica

Cons
- Everything else
- It's Metallica



Recent reviews by this author
In Flames ClaymanTrivium The Crusade
Led Zeppelin Led Zeppelin IVAll That Remains The Fall of Ideals
Bleeding Through The TruthArch Enemy Doomsday Machine
user ratings (6596)
4
excellent
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
Drunken Viking
August 31st 2006


1023 Comments


FCK! The same thing happened with the new album, hopefully SF or someone will see this an change it.

TurnTheOtherWay
August 31st 2006


459 Comments


I was wondering how a Metallica album could have a one star average rating...
Good review, and prepared to be fanboyed to hell once again.

Bron-Yr-Aur
August 31st 2006


4405 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Good work actually, you filled in more detail and edited out some of the jabs. I have no problem voting for this crazy mofo.

SCREAM!
August 31st 2006


15755 Comments


MUCH BETTER. i'll vote this time

Shadows
Moderator
August 31st 2006


2530 Comments


Don't worry, I fixed it for you.

I haven't heard this album aside from a few odd song snippets but nothing caught my attention. And from the sound of your review, I won't waste my time trying it out.

Nepenthe
August 31st 2006


62 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Well, the review was good, but I COMPLETELY disagree with your rating. And I'm not a Metallica fanboy. This album has so many killer tracks, Hit The Lights, Four Horsemen, Jump In The Fire, Phantom Lord. It's a thrash classic. Honestly, I just don't think it's your style.

Drunken Viking
August 31st 2006


1023 Comments


I still have to learn half of it, but believe me when I do learn it, you can bet there'll be 3 YSI links.

Oddsen
August 31st 2006


1127 Comments


Quite an entertaining review but although i'm really not a big fan of metal, Metallica isn't that bad.

SCREAM!
August 31st 2006


15755 Comments


This doesn't sound like "normal" Metallica

Nepenthe
August 31st 2006


62 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I don't mean to sound like an ass, but I find it hilarious that you gave Arch Enemy's Doomsday Machine a 4.5, but gave Kill Em All a 1 hahahaha.



And perhaps you should do reviews of music you find interesting, instead of just finding as many ways as you can to bash Metallica.This Message Edited On 08.31.06

Oddsen
August 31st 2006


1127 Comments


Well, he probably does right reviews for things he likes and its fun to bash bands everyone likes.

Drunken Viking
August 31st 2006


1023 Comments


If people only reviewed what they liked then Sputnik in all honesty would suck.
Everything would the album was awesome. If I can't give Metallica a bad review, then I
don't why it should be any different for Atreyu.

Oh, and Arch Enemy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Metallica.This Message Edited On 08.31.06

Nepenthe
August 31st 2006


62 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Well, let's see, because the only band you've ever given lower than a 3.5 is Metallica. It seems like you're just one of those trendy Metallica haters, and you think you're being cool by making 'reviews', which in actuality are just four paragraphs of you bashing Metallica.



And I'm still laughing about your Doomsday Machine score.

Drunken Viking
August 31st 2006


1023 Comments


I don't like Metallica. Deal with it. I seriously dislike these guys, and I'd say I backed up my point pretty damn well. And if I was trying to be trendy bashing '80s Metallica wouldn't be the way to go. And I'm surprised you picked Arch Enemy over A7X, that's the obvious you're an idiot choice for most.

metallicaman8
August 31st 2006


4677 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I'm on the fence with this review. It was much better than first, that's a given. You gave a good amount of detail and all that. But a lot of the cheap shots like the one about Lars sueing in teh last paragraph turned me off. Most of them weren't rally funny. You also over exagerated things. For example Hetfield's voice does not sound like when you suck the helium out of a balloon, it's no where near that high. It's higher than his usual voice, sure, but not that high. I think I'll just refrain from voting.



Oh, and Quorthonace has a point there.

Nepenthe
August 31st 2006


62 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Nah, A7X actually has talent.



It's fine if you dislike Metallica, but don't try that "you have to have some negative reviews" bullshit if you're only going to exercise it on one band you dislike.

Bron-Yr-Aur
August 31st 2006


4405 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

For example Hetfield's voice does not sound like when you suck the helium out of a balloon, it's no where near that high. It's higher than his usual voice, sure, but not that high.


He honestly sounds like a 9th grader on this album.



And you two should probably just quit arguing about something as ridiculous as Kill' Em All.

Drunken Viking
August 31st 2006


1023 Comments


[Quote=]I'm on the fence with this review. It was much better than first, that's a
given. You gave a good amount of detail and all that. But a lot of the cheap shots
like the one about Lars sueing in teh last paragraph turned me off. Most of them
weren't rally funny. You also over exagerated things. For example Hetfield's voice
does not sound like when you suck the helium out of a balloon, it's no where near
that high. It's higher than his usual voice, sure, but not that high. I think I'll just
refrain from voting.



Oh, and Quorthonace has a point there.
[/QUOTE]
For christs sakes read the first sentance of the review

@ Quothonance, just to make you happy I'll review AYDY? by CoB. That should be
in the 2.5 range.

[QUOTE=]He honestly sounds like a 9th grader on this album[/QUOTE]
I'm a ninth grader. :mad: This Message Edited On 08.31.06

Nepenthe
August 31st 2006


62 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

You shouldn't be doing reviews to make me happy, but just try and spread out your bashing, instead of just focusing on one band.



And um, Bron-Yr-Aur, I don't know you, but I know that you're respected and whatnot, but seriously, shut the fuck up.

metallicaman8
August 31st 2006


4677 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

[quote=DV]For christs sakes read the first sentance of the review[/quote]



I read it. I also chose to ignore it. it's fine to have jokes in your reviews, but I found most of them lame, so I felt like saying something. Furthermore, after reading what that guy said about your album ratings I went and checked them out. You SNABK by Atreyu a 3 (or 3.5, can't remember now). Atreyu have just as bad of vocals as metallica, the musicianship is bland. Pretty much everything is mediocre. the only that it has that beats this album is preduction. I'm aware that, that's your personal opinion and there's nothing I can do about it, but it also leads me to believe you are extremely bias, more bias than I perviously thought.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy