Paris Hilton Paris
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Sepstrup
August 30th 2006


1567 Comments


The single isn't crap. It's ok.

south_of_heaven 11
August 30th 2006


5612 Comments


Heh, I remember posting the news article about this album way back in the day...

I laughed so hard when she said she was gonna make it with a mix of reggae.This Message Edited On 08.30.06

Activista anti-MTV
August 30th 2006


3152 Comments


[quote=iluvator]Rating it 1 or 5 '06.[/quote]
I am leaning 5.

El_Goodo
September 1st 2006


1016 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

This album is insanely catchy, what is wrong with all of you! Have you no idea what this album was made for? It was made for the charts, and for the mainstream and it is excellent for what it is created for. Stop judging it like it is supposed to be a classic rock album. Zeppelin's not going to get much love if were trying to rate it as a bluegrass album. Her voice is actually good, and I'm not one of those people who watch the Party Possie episode of the Simpsons and believe that machines can instantly make people sound good. She has a pretty good voice for pop music.



If this was any other pop singer other than Paris Hilton, you would not be so harsh on it.



I'm not the one that gave you a neg, but if I were to guess it might be because you spent alot of the review writing about her lyrics like you expect her to be Bob Dylan. Then you go on to compare her to Christina Aguilera and still end up giving the album a 2.This Message Edited On 09.01.06

RazorBladeLight
September 1st 2006


258 Comments


umm... Goodo... I have said that I only heard whatever the hell the single is and thought vocals were fine... and I do believe the party possie thing because Machines do ACTUALLY change your voice completely-- i.e. Jennifer Lopez. But if you read what most people are writing, they dislike the album for its self-obsessed outlook on herself. Most agree that it is catchy pop but they rate it harshly because the lyrics are just disgusting. I know many do rate it low because it is Hilton, but many others look at the lyrics... dude I read them... they are ridiculous.

RandyfromPennywise
September 1st 2006


752 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

[QUOTE=El Goodo]User Album Rating: 4



This album is insanely catchy, what is wrong with all of you! Have you no idea what this album was made for? It was made for the charts, and for the mainstream and it is excellent for what it is created for. Stop judging it like it is supposed to be a classic rock album. Zeppelin's not going to get much love if were trying to rate it as a bluegrass album. Her voice is actually good, and I'm not one of those people who watch the Party Possie episode of the Simpsons and believe that machines can instantly make people sound good. She has a pretty good voice for pop music.



If this was any other pop singer other than Paris Hilton, you would not be so harsh on it.



I'm not the one that gave you a neg, but if I were to guess it might be because you spent alot of the review writing about her lyrics like you expect her to be Bob Dylan. Then you go on to compare her to Christina Aguilera and still end up giving the album a 2.[/QUOTE]I actually tried to review this album as objectively as I could. I wrote a fair bit about the lyrics because they are a stand-out part of the album. They are very in-your-face and are delivered in a similar manner. They feature much more prominently than the instruments.



I didn't rate this a two because it's Paris Hilton: I rated it two because I believe it to be worthy of a two. There are a couple of catchy songs on it but even viewing it as a made-for-the-charts Pop album it is by no means a stellar effort.

IsItLuck?
Emeritus
September 1st 2006


4957 Comments


For some reason I don't think that 53 people listened to the entire album, but they all voted. I'm sure it's terrible but at least listen to the whole CD.

El_Goodo
September 1st 2006


1016 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I didn't know that giving some guy a blowjob and videotaping it could give you fame and a record deal.











hmmm...... at least I know what must be done if I ever want a signed.




It was alot more than a blowjob ...and also being the daughter of a rich hotel chain owner may also have something to do with her fame....

Sepstrup
September 1st 2006


1567 Comments


I actually expect this album to be decent and not horrible.

CharmlessMan
September 6th 2006


169 Comments


it's "artists" (use the term loosely) like this who really shit me big stylee...because of money they have and because of who they are, they can release music which is nothing more than a fad, which will earn them even more money....while REAL artists who write decent tunes that actually mean something struggle and get no-where because they ain't got money to pursue their dream...it's quite sad really.

This is music was made by someone who only wants to make music because they can, not because they love it.

CharmlessMan
September 6th 2006


169 Comments


sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, you tosser.

Kyle
September 6th 2006


667 Comments


That's absurd, rich people don't like music.

Mister Mop
September 6th 2006


266 Comments


RandyFromPennywise.....
did you actually buy this album?
coz if you did then you have just wasted a good $12.

RandyfromPennywise
September 6th 2006


752 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

No, as explained before I downloaded the album using torrents.



So it appears that this album is a commercial flop, selling fuck-all copies. Gang gang.

Foreskin Fondler
September 12th 2006


279 Comments


Yeah, she obviously learned how to sing so she could make more money instead of the far more obvious explanation that she just likes music.

actually, I think she just put out an album because she's an attention whore that loves attention.

I'm pretty sure this album ain't that bad though. I mean she has a lot of money meaning she can hire the best to help her make an album thats actually worth listening to.
So it appears that this album is a commercial flop, selling fuck-all copies. Gang gang.

If this would have been any other pop artist, the album would have been certified platinum in a matter of weeks.




keithmoon
September 26th 2006


19 Comments


Why is pop suddenly the worst and most subestimated genre?
Why people think this about pop music?
Weren't the beatles and fleetwood mac pop musicians?
This album is not Pop, is another genre that has developed the last years ,I don't know It's name but I know it sucks and that we shouldn't call it pop anymore.






CanonInD
September 26th 2006


359 Comments


no its definitely pop

Pwntendo
September 26th 2006


70 Comments


Yeah, you're just an idiot.

Kage
September 26th 2006


1172 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

I dunno, I kind of agree with him.

RandyfromPennywise
September 26th 2006


752 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

This is bubble-gum dance-pop music.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy