Album Rating: 2.5

with bruce on vox maybe

Album Rating: 2.5

Nah, Bayley's vox are perfect for this kind of song. Although Bruce's rendition is kick ass.

Album Rating: 2.5

considering an iron maiden song as one of their best openers with blaze on vocals is an atrocious thought

Album Rating: 2.5

Blaze has a great voice, just a different voice to Bruce

Album Rating: 3.0

Agreed.

Album Rating: 2.5

so does ian gillan but that doesn't mean he was a good fit for black sabbath

Album Rating: 2.5

Fair enough, but this album wasn't the traditional maiden sound. It was a darker sound which worked with Bayley's vox

Album Rating: 3.5

sign of the cross would be a lot worse with bruce on vocals (check the rio version its not even close to the original)

Album Rating: 4.5

Actually I thought SOTC was kinda plodding on the album. Bruce's version gives it plenty more kick.

Album Rating: 3.5

i respectfully disagree (very hard)



blaze is a great singer and deep tone fits well with this album and sign of the cross particularly

Album Rating: 3.5

I don't like Virtual IX that much anymore, but Blaze sounds great and 'appropriate' here.

Album Rating: 2.5

the rio version crushes blaze's studio

Album Rating: 3.0

the sign of the croooooooss

Album Rating: 3.5

the rio version crushes blaze's studio

Album Rating: 2.5

the only thing that's comical is Blaze singing in Iron Maiden

Album Rating: 2.5

Blaze rules m/

Album Rating: 2.5

that may be true, but not in this band he doesn't

Album Rating: 2.5

he really did though



ahh opinions

Album Rating: 2.5

there's a reason why Maiden went from playing in front of 20,000 down to 500 folks in a small club

Album Rating: 2.5

Yeah, but that doesn't necessarily mean that they had become bad. This sound they had at the time was just not as commercial.