Great review.
This is fucking terrible
|
| |
Sweet rev prancer, I wish you would have expanded more on the album itself and less on the band's concept, etc but it was an enjoyable read nonetheless.
I still don't know how I feel about this. Definitely not terrible, but not sure it's a classic either.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
I am unsure myself here. Really hard to into this one for me. The biggest problem for me here are the distant vocals. The chaotic approach is something I might listen to very infrequently. Tendency 3.0 - 3.5
|
| |
Yeah I am around that too.
|
| |
this review is so mega and so is this band.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
hella loud album
|
| |
The album cover looks like the guy was forced to take the picture against his will and was bored and didn't want to be there but he was getting paid to be so he stayed and took it somewhat seriously at the same time
I don't know how much pre-thought went into the album cover or if the guy was going for that aesthetic and meticulously tried hard to get that affect, but if he did do that then that is a bad sign for the music.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
First reaction:
Miss Machine is to Calculating Infinity as ULTRAPOP is to Only Love.
|
| |
How would you guys compare this album to the Converge album ''All We Love We Leave Behind'' ?
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
yo dewinged, thank you. there are loads of reviews for this album out there that all talk about the music, so I thought I'd take a different approach and sort of document my experience leading up to the release and tie it in to the concept. as for the rating, the 5.0 is supposed to buy into the concept and mirror the 'delusion' I talk about (and I really just like the music that much lol)
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Initial thought is that the bombast and chaos from Only Love is way less. Iām not grooving on this as much.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
smh Ultrapop is Bruno Mars not this
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
i have never understood the hype behind this band
|
| |
It is beyond your feeble comprehension
|
| |
time 2 listen
edit: album is good but has little in the way of originality
|
| |
ā The album cover looks like the guy was forced to take the picture against his will and was bored and didn't want to be there but he was getting paid to be so he stayed and took it somewhat seriously at the same time
I don't know how much pre-thought went into the album cover or if the guy was going for that aesthetic and meticulously tried hard to get that affect, but if he did do that then that is a bad sign for the music.ā
Stop pseudo-analyzing the artwork and listen to the damn album
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
my AOTY so far :p
|
| |
Cover everything in fuzz. Use mysterious marketing. Give em the ol 5. The hype is overdone.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
nah its a game changer
|
| |
If I was unimpressed with the last should I still bother with this?
|
| |
|