summary does not check out
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
My first crack since Mit Gas and it’s certainly Tomahawk
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Much as this is not amazing, I'm not convinced it's fair for it to have the lowest avg of any Tomahawk album
Oh well, this site's fault for overrating their discog ig
|
| |
i think it's pretty fair considering it's their blandest album by a "country mile"
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
The review really sums it up for me, so familiar sounding. Very listenable and I'm glad to have given it a few spins and will give a few more, but overall it is a completely redundant album.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
People are underrating this for some reason. What more do people want from a Tomahawk album? This is better than both Anonymous and Oddfellows.
Nothing will ever touch Mit Gas but this isn't too far behind the debut I reckon.
|
| |
"Oh well, this site's fault for overrating their discog ig"
All those averages look pretty fair to me.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off
No, this is patrick.
|
| |
Tomahawk keep getting worst and worst. This band should have been a one-album project, much like Lovage and Peeping Tom.
|
| |
I dunno, Mit Gas was a nice follow up to their debut.
|
| |
just a "nice follow up", indeed.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off
this blows ass
|
| |
you already said that
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
It's such a pity that a supergroup with Patton, Denison and Stanier would turn out so damn... average.
|
| |
|