Metallica St. Anger
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Knoxvillelives
August 31st 2004


342 Comments


I knid of like this album. I REALLY like Some Kind Of Monster, and I can't wait to see the film over in da UK. St. Anger the song is alright, the rest is OK. Hetfield sounds good imo, especially on SKOM and St. Anger, his voice sounds rougher, more mature whereas on previous records it was very 80's, not very defined, blended in too much etc. Although Metallica are not my fave band by a long shot, I prefer this album to Master of Puppets and Justice for all, which are the other MET albums I ownbecuase it sounds more modern (I like 80's pop, 60's rock, but not 80's metal!). The drumming isn't bad, but the trebly snare pisses me off, but on St. Anger and SKOM it is played down a little so I don't mind.

The Bronx Are Here
August 31st 2004


16 Comments


[QUOTE=metallica_pyro]9 out of 5!! One of Metallica's best albums!![/QUOTE]


are you ****ing joking! that was their worst album so far! In my opinion all of their albums up to the black album have had some of the best music on i have ever heard! It aint terrible but it aint exactly their style of music.

you've gota give 'em brownie points for trying

2.5/5 (mainly for trying something new)

The Bronx Are Here
August 31st 2004


16 Comments


[QUOTE=jimmymcmahon2001]This is album is good in small doses. I can listen to each song at a time, but i cant do it all at once. The first time i listend to it, i got a headache at song 7.
Each song on its own is all right, but as a whole, its un listenable.
2/5[/QUOTE]

Atleast i've got an album that will put me to sleep at night! no joke it's my sleep music.

but i understand what your saying the drums are very annoying!!!!!

The Bronx Are Here
August 31st 2004


16 Comments


[QUOTE=Raijo]Metallica's best effort, 1000000/5 :rolleyes:[/QUOTE]



ARE YOU ON DRUGS????????? I MEAN GEEZ WTF WERE YOU THINKING WHEN YOU WROTE THAT HAVE YOU NOT HEARD THEIR TRULY GREAT SONGS FROM THE EARLY DAYS WHEN YOU WERE A WEE NIPER AND I WERNT BORN!

SubtleDagger
August 31st 2004


737 Comments


Someone doesn't get sarcasm.

This someone also seems to be a retard.

Bartender
August 31st 2004


826 Comments


The :rolleyes: is sarcastic.

EDIT: Damn.

Knoxvillelives
September 1st 2004


342 Comments


What a dumbass. Who types in capitals anyway? How can you spell wee nipper wrong?

The Bronx Are Here
September 1st 2004


16 Comments


[QUOTE=Knoxvillelives]What a dumbass. Who types in capitals anyway? How can you spell wee nipper wrong?[/QUOTE]

ATH A MATTU OV FUCT IME A VERRY GUD SPEELER SO SHUT DA FUOOK UOP
ANT ME MOMIE SES I IS A SPESIAL SHILD :D

The Bronx Are Here
September 1st 2004


16 Comments


[QUOTE=Knoxvillelives]Wht a dubmass. ho typs in captals anywie? How can you spell wee niiperrr wrong?[/QUOTE]

I'm this guys friend you say he can't spell then look at you

caspian
November 9th 2004


38 Comments


there worst album, but still a lot better then most albums released today. 3.5/5.

-1 production -1 lack of solos -1 "ooo what a good boy you are"
+1 lars drumming (sounded crap, but it swung like never before)
+0.5 DVD

Chu
November 9th 2004


7 Comments


[QUOTE=manuscriptreplica]i tend to agree with Bartender - just because its **** compared to old metallica doesnt make it the worst album ever and deserving of .5/5. like really, you cannot possibly conceive a good charlotte CD is better than this.
i gave it a 3/5... i couldnt really care if they 'sold out' im sure they had enough money that they didnt need to go mainstream to get more money, its to expand their fan base. i am sure their next album will be back to 80's metallica and everyone will love them again.
well thats what i think anyways[/QUOTE]
I really hope you're correct, and if you are, well I'll go out on the town and shout everyone drinks.

manuscriptreplica
November 9th 2004


431 Comments


I must of wrote that a while ago

chili_hed
November 10th 2004


3 Comments


drop c is ok for a couple of songs, but not for a whole album. drums are **** too, and the singing is too repetitive. this is my first metallica album, i was going to buy black. i think maybe i should've.

Hammertime1506
November 13th 2004


1 Comments


:upset: ---> CAPS LOCK :smoke:


EVERYBODY SELL OUT!!! you'll make more Money!!! :eek: :lol:

~Mars Volta~

Lars_ironcobra_doublepedal
November 13th 2004


2 Comments


This Album has no quality and without quality in their songs they sound like starters.

Lars_ironcobra_doublepedal
November 13th 2004


2 Comments


Nothing else to say about St. Anger

Rattlehead_22
November 27th 2004


1 Comments


Before this pice of **** came out Metallica was my favorite band. Since then my my favorite band has swiched to Metallica's biggist rival, MEGADETH. So that just goes to show you that putting out a piece of **** you can lose avid fans.

Shadows
Moderator
November 27th 2004


2530 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off

This album has gotton a hell of a lot of attention as well as selling quite a few records. There is still talk about it, even now, so in the commercial world the album gets a 4/5. But there's no getting around that Lars's drums are awful, they tuned to drop C and quit soloing, and Hetfield had some of the worst vocals/lyrics ever. For these reasons, I give it a 1/5.

Aberrationbass
November 27th 2004


1 Comments


this guy was way off about Hetfields voice hes always in Key on that album......

Chu
November 28th 2004


7 Comments


[QUOTE=Rattlehead_22]Before this pice of **** came out Metallica was my favorite band. Since then my my favorite band has swiched to Metallica's biggist rival, MEGADETH. So that just goes to show you that putting out a piece of **** you can lose avid fans.[/QUOTE]
Or maybe you weren't really an avid fan, either way...



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy