Starset Vessels
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Toondude10
January 22nd 2017


15186 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

and I agree with betray and asleep about the review, I feel like you need to get more to the point on why you think this is bad. You just end up making a bunch of Transformers jokes and not a lot of people are going to take you seriously because of it.

William21
January 22nd 2017


875 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Wait, is this a Starset review or a Transformers review?

Toondude10
January 22nd 2017


15186 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

my point exactly

Sowing
Moderator
January 22nd 2017


43954 Comments


Great write up. Loved the comparison between this album and those horribly hyped up, substanceless films.

ashcrash9
Contributing Reviewer
January 22nd 2017


3349 Comments


Yeah, I personally love this review. Never connected this band to Transformers before, but the comparison makes complete sense, and you explain why thoroughly without getting so wrapped up in the analogy that you lose the focus on the music itself. Great job.

Mort.
January 22nd 2017


25068 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

yeah i thought the rev was decent



tho the comparison does go on for a bit too long

Voltimand
January 22nd 2017


1670 Comments


"Vessels sounds, at least, like an over-the-top attempt to be featured on film’s butt rock soundtrack."

I died.

Ebola
January 22nd 2017


4520 Comments


This is an okay review, but I think you went a bit far with the Transformers comparison. It worked for the first few paragraphs, but you never really transitioned into speaking only about the album in question.

"Megan Fox’s glistening midriff and lovely bosom dangling over a steamy radiator" lmfao

Kupasexy15
January 22nd 2017


364 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

@toondude & Ebola



"I feel like you need to get more to the point on why you think this is bad. You just end up making a bunch of Transformers jokes and not a lot of people are going to take you seriously because of it."



"This is an okay review, but I think you went a bit far with the Transformers comparison. It worked for the first few paragraphs, but you never really transitioned into speaking only about the album in question."



In my defense, I feel like I do. It's just metaphorical and not literal at first. Every review has the challenge of explaining how something is to someone who hasn't experienced it. Bay's Transformers movies -- as negatively received over for his Bayisms -- was a way to relate to this and describe and say why it's bad all at once.



Perhaps, this could have been more concise and the metaphor extends too long, fine, but, I do there is some detailed analysis of the actual music itself. Plus, I was having fun, so screw me, haha.





Kupasexy15
January 22nd 2017


364 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Sowing gets it, and the endorsement is enough for me.

Toondude10
January 22nd 2017


15186 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

fair enough, it is a well written review but yeah the comparisons went too far. I feel like that entire second paragraph and some of the third paragraph could be cut out and the review would look a lot better.



I just think it's just way too long (just like the album :-P)

AsleepInTheBack
Staff Reviewer
January 22nd 2017


10202 Comments


Yeah I agree, good concept but the section where you go on about Megan Fox is the bit that loses me a little

Kupasexy15
January 22nd 2017


364 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Oh, well. The point is that she's pure sex appeal, superficial eye candy that everyone enjoyed when we first saw her in the original Transformers -- a guilty pleasure. Same thing, at least for me, with Starset's debut. But then on this LP and the Transformer's sequels we realize how overblown and shallow Bay's Transformers, Fox, and Starset really are.

Kupasexy15
January 22nd 2017


364 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I do appreciate the feedback, positive and constructive, from everyone, btw. I do have a tendency to get abstract.

Mesm277
January 22nd 2017


1103 Comments


Chorus instrumental for Die for You is basically Doomed

AsleepInTheBack
Staff Reviewer
January 22nd 2017


10202 Comments


No I got the point that you were making by discussing Megan Fox, my point was that it was excessive. Well deserved feature regardless

BlazinBlitzer
January 22nd 2017


2026 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

I like the comparison because it's pretty accurate. God, what a snooze of an album.



Also, pos.

TVC15
January 22nd 2017


11372 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I thought the first album was decent but went on too long; they were kind of a diet pepsi version of Thirty Seconds to Mars. How long is this album?

FullOfSounds
January 22nd 2017


15821 Comments


10 minutes longer than the last. I'm avoiding completely

Kupasexy15
January 22nd 2017


364 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

@TVC15



It's 70 minutes. There's the unnecessary instrumentals in between way too many tracks.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy