Cradle of Filth Dusk and Her Embrace - The Original Sin
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Hawks
July 8th 2016


87064 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Yeah I'm gonna go grab this on Sunday probably. It'll be nice to have in the car.

DoctorDoom
July 8th 2016


2987 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Get a fire AUX cord an Spotify premium, bud.

DoctorDoom
July 8th 2016


2987 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

This version of Haunted Shores is superior.

Hawks
July 8th 2016


87064 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

My system is all fucked my aux doesn't work at all, gotta use CDs lol.

Willie
Moderator
July 8th 2016


20212 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

They have those aux plugs that plug into your antenna slot in the back of your stereo. My first car had that setup. It definitely works.

Hawks
July 8th 2016


87064 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Yeah that's true, I'd like to have a copy of this anyways though. Jamming on Spotify right now. m/

MoosechriS
July 8th 2016


6353 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Jamming this now, sounds fucking killer

Hawks
July 8th 2016


87064 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I def like the original (???) one more, but yeah this rips so hard too.

DoctorDoom
July 8th 2016


2987 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Gonna need some time to really digest got comparisons. You can tell major song writing growth but the different styled intro to Beauty Slepg in Sodom shows them hanging on to their lo-fo/simplistic synth attributes found throughout TPOEMF

Hawks
July 8th 2016


87064 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I dig the raw sound here though for sure. Both versions are amazing.

DoctorDoom
July 11th 2016


2987 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I wonder if the nostalgia of the 14 years I jammed the 96 version is keeping me from slightly preferring that version to this. Will listen to both 475248 more times an try to decide.

Shadowmire
July 12th 2016


6660 Comments


this pretty much served as a one time novelty listen for me tbh

DoctorDoom
July 12th 2016


2987 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Not different enough? Didn't keep you interested?

Poet
July 12th 2016


6144 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

So this rules, but should I listen to the original if it's basically the same thing?

Hawks
July 12th 2016


87064 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Therea obvious differences on the 1996 version. The songs are the same for the most part, but they don't sound completely identical in any way.

kris.
July 12th 2016


15504 Comments


i like dani's vocals on this, real raw stuff. sound's a bit too theatrical for me tho. dig the new one more.

Shadowmire
July 13th 2016


6660 Comments


"Not different enough? Didn't keep you interested?"

it's different enough, but for me personally not in such a way that it's better than the original release (or really even close). just cool to listen to one time

Hawks
July 13th 2016


87064 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I can agree with that. Not the one time listening thing, but the first part.

Willie
Moderator
July 13th 2016


20212 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

After more listens, I definitely like this version more. This is probably the one I'll listen to from now on.

Hawks
July 14th 2016


87064 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Can't argue with that.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy