Tool Lateralus
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
joh soxe
September 12th 2006


44 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

with all due respect daggerfall, there is plenty of point in making music even if it doesn't appeal to anyone. your comment suggests music is made for an audience, or worse that its made as a product for consumption. tool aren't a government or a business: even if everyone else on earth died they would still make this music because they want to, they get a thrill out of challenging themselves and finding out what it's about to exist. people seem to think that being intelligent is wrong or something. if you don't want to engage in deeper meanings of stuff then why are you even bothering with tool. lou reed is for the most part boring, unartistic pop.

pixiesfanyo
September 12th 2006


1223 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Lou Reed taking a shit is more important than Tool's entire career.



Neoteric
September 12th 2006


3243 Comments


lol@comment

Niiice.

Tyler
Emeritus
September 12th 2006


7927 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

lol @ this review is wrong comment.

wikuk
September 12th 2006


1110 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Tool calling nu-metal is ridiculous. They aren't nu-metal, but they aren't fully progressive neither. I see them as a kind of hardrock band which has nu-metal and progressive traits.



Sure, Tool and The Mars Volta are "progressive" in comparsion too the mainstream, but in reality they are simply just rock and roll bands that add a few bells and whistles too their sound.




In reality? You mean, when compared to oldschool progressive like King Crimson and Pink Floyd.

You better watch out as your taking a place right before the fanboys, you started out cool and opinion-defended but you're becoming more biased and close-minded.This Message Edited On 09.12.06

pixiesfanyo
September 12th 2006


1223 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

No, I mean progressive in comparsions too any progressive band out right now.



I'm not being biased and close-minded.



You guys are just using the same excuses, that the review already defended.

wikuk
September 13th 2006


1110 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

1. ok

2. but you're starting to do that though

3. nope

With Decay
September 13th 2006


22 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

lol tool

wikuk
September 16th 2006


1110 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

lol



BTW, if you don't like Lateralus lyrics, that's fine. Maybe I'm just close minded and stupid, but take a look at lyrics from 10k days, especially Rosetta Stoned. That's some really outstanding writing there. I wouldn't call Elliot Smith and Isis better lyricists than Tool. It's not that Elliot Smith is bad, but his lyrics are quite simplistic. Isis on the other hand have some outstanding lyrics, but only a few since they barely use vocals. It's more about the music with them.This Message Edited On 09.16.06

omgwtfboogie
November 20th 2006


211 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Well, I was amazed someone thought so little about Lateralus until I saw the reviewer's tastes. Figures.



Good review. Sort of provided an iconoclastic viewpoint to balance out the 3689328690328902 other near-fellating reviews.

pixiesfanyo
November 21st 2006


1223 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

What is that suppose to mean?



My tastes?

Lunarfall
December 2nd 2006


3178 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

I find it ironic that you hate Keenan's lyrics, as his lyrics are considered to be among the best among rock as a whole. (I even hate Tool too, and I'm saying this.)

Pebster49
December 2nd 2006


3023 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

He does have one of the best lyric writeing in Metal/Rock...I don't understand how you can hate too, they are soo good Makes me think deeper...I usually do my homework to tool...don't ask

wikuk
January 6th 2007


1110 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Well, they are very good indeed, but really not the best. Pixiefanyo was right at that point. I'm still trying to figure out why this band is not progressive, hell, even Dredg second CD "El Cielo" was considered progressive.

Lunarfall
January 14th 2007


3178 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

It is overdone. So overdone that it turned out to be incredibly boring and not fun to listen to at all.

metallicaman8
January 14th 2007


4677 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

Were you expecting it to be fun?

JumpTheF**kUp
January 15th 2007


2722 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

It doesn't suck.This Message Edited On 01.14.07

samthebassman
February 17th 2007


2164 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

A long winded bulls hit review. You slag off what is a modern classic, nothing like this album has been written before, it is a blue print that every prog rock album for the next 50 years will follow.



A massive thumbs down, dude, I thought you were cool.

Lunarfall
February 27th 2007


3178 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

Were you expecting it to be fun?
I could fall asleep listening to this album, or anything by Tool in that matter. I agree with the review and chan 100% here.



Fyi, Tool is Hard Rock with Progressive traits, imo. Hardly metal, or even alternate metal.This Message Edited On 02.26.07

niobium
March 2nd 2007


238 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Good review



/loves this album



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy