Indian Summer
Science 1994


4.0
excellent

Review

by MrMatt767 USER (3 Reviews)
January 29th, 2015 | 30 replies


Release Date: 2002 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Emotional AND musical sensibilities allow Indian Summer to craft an album that places the listener on a cathartic roller-coaster of abrasive highs and somber, self-reflective lows.

I have always been of the opinion that skramz’s ability to captivate an audience and hold it by the emotive jugular extends beyond abrasive instrumentation and histrionic lyricism. Indeed skramz – across nearly every movement and every ‘wave’ – instead owes its once burgeoning fan base and longtime, contemporary relevance to a touching, poignant structure. Embracing tender, soft-spoken instrumentation that is overlapped with spoken-word lyricism and 1900-something, African-American Jazz recordings, Indian Summer’s “Science 1994” is able to craft an album that beautifully displays this structure – one that encounters its possibility thanks to abrasive contrast. In opposition to its monochromatic spoken verses, “Science 1994” is able to seamlessly launch into an uncompromising tirade of reverberating cries, chaotic screams and pounding crescendos – and in doing so, offers the listener a peep into the raw and emotive world of adolescent anguish.

"1994's" brilliance is best exemplified by the various strands of narrative the pervade its nine tracks, offering the attentive listener a move away from the oft-melodramatic indulgence of Indian Summer's screamo contemporaries with lyrical impressiveness saturating murmuring vocals and arpeggiated guitar rhythm. Foremost, Angry Son opens the lyrical storybook, impressing the tale of greed and the broken man, redeemed in his final hour, upon the listener. When returning to the enduring question of love – and its criminal partner; loss – “1994” again deserves plaudits for its attempts at subtlety, I Think Your Train is Leaving’s minimalism confronting the loved one’s departure--raw and juvenile emotion contained in the tracks closing moments--"bright eyes!"

It is though, this raw juvenility that often leaves “1994” floored by what the listener senses is the weight of Indian Summer's self-ascribed task--to craft an album that is purely and unashamedly emotive, dissonant and confrontational. As the album wears, Indian Summer’s push for 'screamo-esque' enthusiasm results in tracks – Orchard and Sugar Pill in particular – presenting noticeably blander than those at the beginning of the album. In sum, Indian Summer often run out of energy and inventiveness towards the closing stages of the album as tracks increasingly give the listener the sense that they are listening to the same song--be it Touch the Wings of An Angel, Truman etc.--on repeat. Soft-spoken low points increasingly drag on, whilst the previously energetic highs slump into sonic and vocal repetitiveness. Sugar Pill unashamedly recycles a similar structure and lyrical blueprint to I Think Your Train is Leaving as monotonous chants ("pill don't leave me") render the closing tracks smacking of an inexperience that is spotlighted by an eagerness to write material, but an unwillingness to refine it.

Nevertheless (and banality aside) “1994” undoubtedly dishes up a slice of post-hardcore screamo at its contrasting best as thrilling energy and sustained, murmured instrumentalism interweave to create a seminal album. It remains important to consider that in a musical scene in which the weight of various important releases still weigh heavily upon the nostalgic and emotional minds of numerous listeners, “Science 1994” can claim to be one of the first and most complete. Whilst not necessarily reinventing the wheel – hell, when Indian Summer were recording, screamo’s ‘wheel’ was barely even conceived – what “Science 1994” does offer is a record that performs an inherently personal and cathartic task with relative brilliance.


user ratings (145)
4
excellent
other reviews of this album
facetheslayer666 (3.5)
Indian Summer proves its superiority in "Science 1994."...



Comments:Add a Comment 
MrMatt767
January 29th 2015


559 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Hey guys this is my second ever reviewwwww. Any constructive criticism welcome and thanks for reading...

Jots
Emeritus
January 29th 2015


7562 Comments


(edit: fixed)

some bits might be a tad wordy, but for the most part this is a cool review, pos

EyesWideShut
January 29th 2015


5906 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

this one is clossic

adr
January 29th 2015


12097 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

clossic[2]

Trebor.
Emeritus
January 29th 2015


59852 Comments


cool band

YakNips
January 29th 2015


20098 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

remarkably important

MrMatt767
January 29th 2015


559 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Thanks Johnny, I fixed up the two things you directly pointed out and I'll try to reduce the wordiness sometime tonight. Btw, why aren't you a contrib or something yet? I see you offering good advice on legit nearly every new review haha

Jots
Emeritus
January 30th 2015


7562 Comments


cheers, yeah I never applied mostly due to being pretty dormant until this past year but I'll put my name in when they put the word out

treeqt.
January 30th 2015


16970 Comments


i am going to listen to this album tonight

Slut
January 30th 2015


4255 Comments


Really good

MalleusMaleficarum
January 30th 2015


16396 Comments


tree this album is too good 4 u pls stay away

treeqt.
January 30th 2015


16970 Comments


ya it was honestly pretty whatever

EyeForAnEye
January 30th 2015


1741 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I have such a soft spot for Angry Son

Sowing
Moderator
January 30th 2015


43949 Comments


I'd advise you lay off the thesaurus across the board. Even if you're really smart, there's a fine line between sounding intelligent and sounding like you're trying way too hard to impress people (even if that isn't your intention).

"I have always been of the opinion that skramz’s ability to captivate an audience and hold it by the emotive jugular extends beyond the abrasive instrumentation and histrionic lyricism typical of its particulars." You definitely over-worded this, it just reads awkwardly. Using verbose language isn't always good if you lose 50% of your readers in the first sentence of your review.

Meaning-wise and in terms of structure it's not a bad review, I just suggest you try to be more casual next time. Good reviewers write reviews that flow smoothly and are easy to read - it's not just about including as many big words as possible.


Phlegm
January 30th 2015


7250 Comments


cool cover

MrMatt767
January 30th 2015


559 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

@Sowing, yeah I agree. Another thing I struggle with is the length of some of my sentences. For my writing, a combination of verbiage and being overly sesquipedalian can just leave my writing excessively convoluted. Oh well, I'll try to improve next time.

Sowing
Moderator
January 30th 2015


43949 Comments


Yeah I mean it's not a bad review or anything, just hard to follow even when you know what all the words mean. Just use your natural tone, and I think you'll find it reads a lot better.

MrMatt767
January 30th 2015


559 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Nice, thanks for the feedback dude!

treeqt.
January 30th 2015


16970 Comments


what's actually the point of this album when orchid exists

adr
January 30th 2015


12097 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

lmao



These guys formed 5 years before Orchid and this is nothing like Orchid fuk u man



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy