Album Rating: 4.0
hahahahaahahah
Hawks ain't happy.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
This never struck me as being weird.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
It's different for dm I guess, but idk where "stoner post-black" came from.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I kinda get what he was trying to say with "stoner", but post-black lolwut?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I don't see either one. Whatever though. m/
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
psychedelic actually, not stoner. Whatever though. m/ [2]
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
yeah it's like weird psych dm
for jt this prob isn't weird lol, I think he listens to a lot of psych. but yeah I think on the dm spectrum, this is pretty weird. but that doesn't mean it's bad at all!
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Psych yeah I could see that. Still don't understand where post-black came from though....
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
use the word post to piss kill off
psych influenced bm is my fav bm
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
This isn't bm though.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
It's dm ya, some bm influence. Fuck labels it rules
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
rules hard, no weak track
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Transcends you plebz can't handle
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Well I said that being at track 3, later parts definitely didn't remind me of bm in any way. More of bands like tool in fact. but this is obviously heavier
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
hahaha first post-bm, now tool? wow. well you obviously like it, that's all that matters I guess
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
never gets old
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I've heard this many times and it always rules hard. This 3.9 average rating is ridiculous.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
4.1 should be the avg
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
No 4.1455758997555 should be the average
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
This 3.9 average rating is ridiculous.[2]
ok, maybe not ridiculous. but it's definitely too low!
|
| |
|