I acutally do think Gerard is gay.

As in Homo-sexual, I kind-of like this band.

As a girl I think he's wicked hot, and if he's really seriously gay then that would kind of ruin it.

Hold up, got a ?, why do you think? Is it just your gaydar or what?

Good review, you supported your comments.

regardless of their sexual preferance you should hate them for the music nnot the people they sleep with if you shouldnt hate a bvand because they might be gay thats pretty immature hmm i love mcr but i liked the first record the most and i have this dvd it was really awsome and interesting i loved every second of it

Album Rating: 1.5

I agree, you should hate a band because of their music, not their sexual preference. I hate these guys because of their music. It's pretty bad. Alot of sounds the same in my opinion. And they're terrible live

I DONT THINK THEY'RE GAY ANYWAY!

Album Rating: 1.5

It doens't matter. It's that you brought up sexuality period. Sputnik is made for discussion of music. not the discussion of "who you think is totally hot".

I was just saying. I think they're a good band, no matter what the lead singer looks like. They've got a good sound.This Message Edited On 04.29.06

Album Rating: 1.5

aha I disagree with that aswell. I can't stand these guys, I'm not going to give reasons as to why i loathe them, because I already have. Just read a few comments up.This Message Edited On 04.29.06

I agree that they suck live. I really do. Really. But they are good not live, so I still listen to them.

I meant sound as in the whole caboodle, not just the actual music, which isn't espeicially amazing, but the lyrics are great.

Album Rating: 1.5

I'm not really into the lyrics either, but i'll admit that their not as flawed as the instrumentals. And of course "the whole caboodle" sounds good. That's because it's been edited, anyone can sound good if they edit their shit enough. That's why I have no respect for these guys or any band that sucks live. Because if you suck live, that just means you suck, but you're albums probably don't suck because you had them edited and fixed up.



random fact: I forget who it was either, Queen or Rush never once used anything to improve their sound on their albums it was all them. Just wish I could remember which band it was

Well than I guess I like them edited.

I bet it was Rush. Queen has too much electronicy added stuff in it. But that's pretty cool, if eithier one of them did that because they're both good.

I personally like Queen better.

Album Rating: 1.5

I prefer Rush. Probably because I'm Candadian. And the singer in queen is kind of a dink. Although he does have an incredibly unique voice.

Freddy Mercury, you mean? Yeah, he's got a cool voice.

Rush is good, too. There's this one song, I think it's called Trees, you know that one? That's gotta be my favorite.

Album Rating: 1.5

I like "Spirit Of Radio". thats a classic. What's that one song by queen? Like detroit rapcity or something it's rellay good too

Boehemian Rhapsody maybe? It goes " I am a little poor boy from a poor family..." That's my favorite Queen song ( and We Are The Champions ... "We'll keep on fighting till the end...")

Album Rating: 1.5

yeah boehemian rhapsody, I don't know where i got detroit