James Blake Overgrown
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
mindleviticus
April 6th 2013


10486 Comments


The IDEA of the genre makes sense, regardless of whether or not it's a stupid or a useful term, it's
categorized with R&B/soul or/and ambient aspects of dubstep

StrangerofSorts
Emeritus
April 6th 2013


2904 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

"Post-dubstep might make sense as a genre except for the fact that we haven't seen any artists making music that can be described as such"



Basically said this in the review.



"you should probably give this first paragraph a re-read, stranger. Reads a lil awkward"



Will do tomorrow, man. A little busy atm :P

Trebor.
Emeritus
April 6th 2013


59837 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

I can't wait until critics start calling the new Daft Punk record "Post-Dance"

Wolfhorde
April 6th 2013


15387 Comments


Yes, but why bother with an idea that has absolutely no application and only adds to the clutter of already rather meaningless genre tags?

mindleviticus
April 6th 2013


10486 Comments


It does in the marketing world! People seem to eat up this "post-dubstep" talk like candy! It works
and makes sense as a genre to refer to it as a more calmer and soulful dubstep, but whether or not it
should be used or is useful is up for debate.

Rev
April 6th 2013


9882 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I think I read that James categorizes his stuff as melodic bass music and I think that's much more descriptive and less stupid than post-dubstep

mindleviticus
April 6th 2013


10486 Comments


I'm not saying it isn't stupid, it certainly is and isn't very descriptive. I'm just saying it makes
sense and it isn't a thing to get so hostile about. Hell, a lot of electronic musicians have actually
lashed out about post-dubstep. I just might not get it, though.

anarchistfish
April 6th 2013


30310 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

then tell me since you're a dubstep expert. People label it as "post" dubstep because it refers to dubstep but adding more to it. Almost like something coming "after" dubstep. Linking things together. More preferably ambient and soul/R&B


And that's pointless. All genres evolve, and this take on is by no means the first change that's been made to it.





Hell knows why we're talking about this anyway. The dubstep on here is minimal.

Rev
April 6th 2013


9882 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I mean, I'm not up in arms about it either way, I just think it's a bit silly

Sleaper
April 6th 2013


3480 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

post-post avant garde lols



anyway album is rad, i dont quite understand why james didnt put every day i ran on the official track list. song is way too good to be a bonus track

mindleviticus
April 6th 2013


10486 Comments


Yeah. All genres evolve. That's why we label them as different things. Yes, post dubstep isn't very insightful or descriptive, but the idea around it is no different from labeling Isis as post-metal because they add more to the metal genre like post rock.

anarchistfish
April 6th 2013


30310 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Completely changing the sound of a genre is different to adding aspects from other genres.

Aids
April 6th 2013


24509 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

this thread is going to be terrible, isn't it?






called it

mindleviticus
April 6th 2013


10486 Comments


Both change the sound of their genres, so why shouldn't both be labelled as different things?

Tyrael
April 6th 2013


21108 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

'Basically said this in the review.'



tl;dr

anarchistfish
April 6th 2013


30310 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

this thread is going to be terrible, isn't it?


Yeah

mindleviticus
April 6th 2013


10486 Comments


Sub-subgenres. It's happening.

mryrtmrnfoxxxy
April 6th 2013


16619 Comments


like 3 of these tracks are perfect and the others kind of aren't

anarchistfish
April 6th 2013


30310 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

There's loads of pretty cool tracks but only one amazing one

Thane
April 6th 2013


2291 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

can see myself bumping this to a 4.5, so good omg



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy