Lana Del Rey Paradise
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
taylormemer
January 1st 2013


4962 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Seriously?

AtavanHalen
January 1st 2013


17920 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

yeah man totally

taylormemer
January 1st 2013


4962 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Damn. Was hoping it was you just being you.

indigonowhere
Emeritus
January 1st 2013


10729 Comments


What's the deal with all these 2012 albums being featured? I don't mean that in an accusatory manner, I'm just curious.

taylormemer
January 1st 2013


4962 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Weren't you here last year?

indigonowhere
Emeritus
January 1st 2013


10729 Comments


Yeah, but I don't recall exactly what happened.

taylormemer
January 1st 2013


4962 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I'm gonna milk this. So, why do you think they are being featured? Surely you have some inkling towards why it may be happening.

indigonowhere
Emeritus
January 1st 2013


10729 Comments


Inkling = promoting some of 2012's biggest albums to summarize the year.

I'm more curious about the means to it, though. I noticed a lot of the releases have been reviewed in the last day or two, and I'm just wondering if particular people were asked to cover certain material for this time period.

Tyrael
January 1st 2013


21113 Comments


I'm just curious as to why Omaha's The Parallax II hasn't been re-featured then

taylormemer
January 1st 2013


4962 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Well, Nick (Iai) last year bumped out a few late reviews, so I think he's just a busy guy. And the others are just you know, reviews for the year. I don't think there's a correlation.

indigonowhere
Emeritus
January 1st 2013


10729 Comments


So, for instance, this review just came from a user wanting to write about one of the year's biggest albums? I could've
sworn I'd seen this review when the album first dropped, but it apparently was written in the last couple days.

And thank you Ty =]

taylormemer
January 1st 2013


4962 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Ahhhh. This is an EP from November with less than 100 ratings, and NOT one of the year's biggest releases. If you look, that review you think you saw is probably that other one... from the 20th Nov.

indigonowhere
Emeritus
January 1st 2013


10729 Comments


Ah, yes! You're right.

EyeForAnEye
January 1st 2013


1741 Comments


Omahastyleee, I keep reading all your posts in the voice of Dr. Schultz. Good movie.

EyeForAnEye
January 1st 2013


1741 Comments


And Disgusted, she's still a good musician, but everyone overhyped her to the point that she's boring.

indigonowhere
Emeritus
January 1st 2013


10729 Comments


Should I read your posts in the voice of a horse?

We both were in the movie, and it was quite the enjoyable experience wasn't it?

EyeForAnEye
January 1st 2013


1741 Comments


I should bow my head every time you introduce me.

My picture is from the twitter profile known as Horse_ebooks. Also know as the best twitter profile ever created ever.

Wolfhorde
January 1st 2013


15373 Comments


"I'm just curious as to why Omaha's The Parallax II hasn't been re-featured then"
'Cause everybody who has influence hates/dislikes/doesn't care about BTBAM.

indigonowhere
Emeritus
January 1st 2013


10729 Comments


Yeah, that explains the dreadfully low 3.9 or 4 average that album has right? ;]

Wolfhorde
January 1st 2013


15373 Comments


You know Sputnik. Just take potsy for example, he rates things 3-4s and then starts saying things like they're "indie cunt garbage". Sputnik is like a maniac with an incredible hormonal imbalance, never knowing what it wants.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2017 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy