Deftones Koi No Yokan
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
demigod!
December 10th 2012


49231 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Rules so hard man.

KerfuffleinaHussle
December 10th 2012


1033 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

what can i say?



i think your head's FUCKED!

oltnabrick
December 10th 2012


35835 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Do you really think that or are you just naming things in the room?

Gwyn.
December 10th 2012


17074 Comments


I don't know

KerfuffleinaHussle
December 10th 2012


1033 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

"Do you really think that or are you just naming things in the room?"



...What?

Gwyn.
December 10th 2012


17074 Comments


Anchorman reference

oltnabrick
December 10th 2012


35835 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Desk. lol

demigod!
December 10th 2012


49231 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

bong

Minus.
December 10th 2012


2703 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

It's pretty pathetic people are making alts just to 1 this album.

demigod!
December 10th 2012


49231 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

the 5s are even worse



man the rating system gets abused so hard lmao

Gwyn.
December 10th 2012


17074 Comments


"the 5s are even worse"

lolwut

Minus.
December 10th 2012


2703 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

How are the 5's worse? The 5's are the closest ratings to reality. The 1's are the product of butthurt haters who want to sabotage the integrity of the album rating.

Gwyn.
December 10th 2012


17074 Comments


A 1 is a near unlistenable album with no redeeming qualities whatsoever

The production of this alone makes it better than a 1

demigod!
December 10th 2012


49231 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

maybe not worse, no, now that i think about it. There are still quite a few exdurated and troll 5s though.

Minus.
December 10th 2012


2703 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Well, for sake of argument, let's assume troll ratings of 1's and 5's have cancelled each other out into a stalemate, at least the 5's are nearly justified. The 1's are just downright ignorant.

Minus.
December 10th 2012


2703 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Yeah that's true. I did notice people were rating this 5 well before it's release so I cant argue that fact. Like I said in another thread, I would never 5 anything this soon. I can only 5 something that I have loved for multiple years. If I still love this album in 10 years, I'll consider it a classic.

oltnabrick
December 10th 2012


35835 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

This had a 4.8 or 4.9 before it came out. Pretty funny.

Uranium
December 10th 2012


7543 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

i wish that were the logic of many users, but listen once, then 5 it is pretty common around these

parts

Gwyn.
December 10th 2012


17074 Comments


" If I still love this album in 10 years, I'll consider it a classic."

That's far too long. Like 3 or 4 years would be fine, but 10 years is simply too much. I can't think of any album that can honestly endure 10 years of listens, specially since taste's change

Minus.
December 10th 2012


2703 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

10 years isnt a set time or anything. I just used it as as an example. It could be 2 or 3 years

perhaps. But if I cant endure an album 10 years later then it contradicts my personal definition of

"classic". Either way, I find it laughable that anyone could 5 an album that was listened to a few

times.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2017 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy