Album Rating: 2.0

Who includes disc 2? Fuck that

Album Rating: 3.5

Most people do, considering it contains some of Radiohead's best tracks mate.

Album Rating: 2.0

That opinion offends the core of my being lmao. IR is remarkable front to back, it's their only perfect album in composition. AMSP has a mix of some of their absolute worst, most run of the mill, and best material all carelessly stuffed into a product like an after thought

Album Rating: 2.0

Studio version of IR is just disc 1. Disc 2 is b-sides, it has no business being included in the discussion. Same with the b side discs of kid a and amnesiac. Sure they all have some great (and terrible) stuff but they are not "the album"

Album Rating: 3.5

'That opinion offends the core of my being lmao. IR is remarkable front to back, it's their only perfect album in composition. AMSP has a mix of some of their absolute worst, most run of the mill, and best material all carelessly stuffed into a product like an after thought '

Agree to disagree, I guess. For the record I think they're both excellent (4.5) and can essentially swap places day to day.

'Studio version of IR is just disc 1. Disc 2 is b-sides, it has no business being included in the discussion. Same with the b side discs of kid a and amnesiac. Sure they all have some great (and terrible) stuff but they are not "the album"'

That much is obvious. My point is that the b-side/disc 2 material was written at or around the same time (or at the very least, it coexisted) and was inevitably, at some point, in the discussion of which songs to include on "the album" track list. Meaning they actively decided to include 'House of Cards' instead of e.g. 'Go Slowly' which is a decision I respect but will never entirely understand.

Album Rating: 2.0

Tracklisting of AMSP is one of the least effective, laziest, mind-bogglingly incompetent offerings of all time

Album Rating: 2.0

It's so bad that it effectively neutered all 4 of the last songs, each of which would have merit if they weren't delivered in such a blue balls cluster

Album Rating: 2.0

Burn the witch into daydreaming is also one of the worst ideas ever, only overshadowed by the idea of having burn the witch on the album at all

Album Rating: 2.0

Fortunately songs like identikit, ful stop and decks dark are still amazing as long as you cherry pick them and put em in a playlist and then throw the disc into the fire

Album Rating: 3.5

i can't begin to comprehend how someone could think that, but i'm happy you project your opinion with such conviction. better than most of the baseless shit-takes around here.

Album Rating: 2.0

It's honestly a more common opinion that the tracklisting of AMSP is absolute trash than that AMSP is consistent, so trust that I'm as surprised as you are



As a selection of singles its fine but hot damn as a whole that album was like a slap in the face

Album Rating: 2.0

AMSP is like the Last Jedi of Radiohead albums



That tracklist is muh green titty milk outrage

Album Rating: 2.0

i find it insulting on a personal level, like I met thom yorke and was like "high I'm a huge fan" and he was like "oh yeah?" And then spat in my face

Album Rating: 2.0

"Our dumb fans will eat anything up lol let's just drop a fuckload of old songs and make it alphabetical, they'll convince themselves its thoughtful and deliberate somehow" is how that album felt

Album Rating: 4.5

tommy yorko bent ur bitch ass over and fucked it with burn the witch

Album Rating: 2.0

straight up, and u know what i said?



"i like to be kissed while im fucked, tommy"

Album Rating: 4.5

'In rainbows and TKOL are first and second for me'



this is the correct take though

Album Rating: 4.5

he kissed you with the super secret amsp from the basement album that happened in an alternate universe

Album Rating: 3.5

Amnesiac still tbh

Album Rating: 3.5

by "consistent" i wasn't necessarily implying that the track list was in the best order, merely that the mean quality of the songs is, in my opinion, greater than that of 'In Rainbows', which has higher highs but lower lows. (of which, those lows are still pretty great, so it's mostly a moot point to argue about this anyway; i love both albums essentially equally.)