And shit you know, I always have my computer volume set to 16 (because autism) and just adjust the volume on my media player. Do you have any clue what that screamer sounds like with headphones set to 16? Not to mention my mouse wasn't near the tab when I opened it so it went on longer than it should of. That's low man wtf

I have a new found inspiration to write a bad review for a critically acclaimed album.

Like Bloom by Beach House?

Review is lol.

Please don't link another screamer. It's not scary just annoying like a power electronics album or something.

No but thank you for that I plan on using it, it's like a more effective SANIC HEGEHOG.

Album Rating: 4.5

this made me really want to listen to this for some reason

Album Rating: 3.0

I wouldn't call it a good review, but I definitely agree. Not as bad as Closer though. His singing on that album is horriffic.

Album Rating: 5.0

"Ian Curtis was a white man that lived in England"



never thought of it that way.. huh.. [2]

I cannot get into this band, no matter how much I try. I understand the hype I guess, but this whole record has always sounded very trite and just un-extraordinary to me.

Album Rating: 5.0

"This is cold, careless, boring music, that has achieved legendary status because of Ian Curtis's tragic suicide. "



r-u-f-u-c-k-i-n-g-r-e-t-a-r-d-e-d

yeah but nah.

Album Rating: 3.5

I think this is a bit overrated as well but it's certainly better than a 2.

Album Rating: 5.0

Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but this opinion takes the form of a formal "review". As an

example of a review, it's pathetic. Setting up strawmen to knock down, making vague points

repetitively and failing to articulate any cogent arguments to support its central idea are never

hallmarks of passable music criticism.



As written, the central idea seems to be that the album is undeserving its place in the music

pantheon. Yet virtually every point is filtered through the perceived reaction of some imaginary

"hipsters", while the reviewer offers virtually nothing beyond a few lazy adjectives to illustrate

his counterview. There's no comparison with other music to provide context on the reviewer's

definition of "cold" or "monotonous", for example.



This is just a tantrum no doubt prompted by some "hipster", whatever the fuck that means, dissing

one of the reviewer's most cherished artists.

yea

Hyperion1001

You should be shot

What did I do

your review is bad and you should feel bad

Album Rating: 4.5

You are a miserable oaf trying to stand out from your cavemen friends, I suppose there aren't enough solo's per song for you and that just made you sad .

Here this might interest you : Emmure , Nickleback , Wold . I swear there are all as mindless and crap as your brain is my dear.