Scar Symmetry The Unseen Empire
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
FenixZero
April 19th 2011


396 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Crysis, I'll do the low blow for you:



U2, The Best Of 1990-2000: rated a 4

System of a Down, System of a Down: Rated a 5



Oof.

XfingTheSullen
April 19th 2011


5237 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

I'm very sorry but I fail to notice how Scar Symmetry have fallen into any single melodeath stereotype, let alone all of them.

XfingTheSullen
April 19th 2011


5237 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

SOAD'S SOAD was perfect in its genre. I feel no shame whatsoever.

Crimson Death
April 19th 2011


533 Comments


Sonic Syndicate We Rule The Night: 1

How dare you perform such blasphemy?!? that album is a 10/5.

XfingTheSullen
April 19th 2011


5237 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

@Crysis



I see nothing wrong with giving The Panic Broadcast 3,5. The problem is that this album is better than TPB, so it doesn't deserve a 2.

Crysis
Emeritus
April 19th 2011


17626 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I obviously don't think it's better, so telling me that this doesn't deserve a 2 because it is better is useless.



ugh 10,000th comment spent arguing about why a shitty album is shitty

XfingTheSullen
April 19th 2011


5237 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

Then you're lost

FenixZero
April 20th 2011


396 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Maybe you are the lost one!

UnitK2K
April 20th 2011


136 Comments


I wish that guy who gave this a 5 would listen to this till the day he dies. I'd give him 3 days.

Lunarcheese
April 20th 2011


33 Comments


This is most certainly neither a 2 nor a 4.5. I think A 3 (MAYBE a 3.5) would be fair. This is from someone who would ride HU-era Scar Symmetry's cock into town to buy groceries and not feel a hint of regret.

I find a 2 insulting really. The album is listenable, has a few pretty good tracks (The Anomaly is the catchy Scar Symmetry I've missed so dearly), and the musicianship for the most part is amazing. Per is a bloody fantastic guitarist, and anyone should be able to see that.

4.5 is also ridiculous because well... come on. Some of the songs are worthless, the drums and bass remain unimpressive/completely lost in the mix, the 2 new vocalists are lesser to Christian in both of their "specialties", and they have thrown away a lot of what made them fantastic. (No more lengthy epics? Seriously.)

This site has 3 different kinds of members: Staff (all of whom hate Scar Symmetry, because it's nothing like their beloved Converge), Elitists (who gobble and regurgitate Staff opinion like a bulimic at a hotdog eating competition), and normal people/metalheads. Unfortunately, the former 2 have the power, and as can be seen with the mysteriously changing pos's for the 2 reviews of this album, they have no problem misusing it.

Basically, Scar Symmetry will always get shit here. It's just how the site is. Just gotta deal with it and not make the fans look incompetent (Pankar is failing at this.)

Also, Wizard has proven that one can have 14k posts and still be dumber than a monkey with down's. Anyone who can say Christian Alvestam's vocals suck is just not worth their weight in piss.

qwe3
April 20th 2011


21836 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

loooooooooool

Crysis
Emeritus
April 20th 2011


17626 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Your 3-class breakdown of the site's stratification system is incredibly insightful and accurate, please tell me more

Crysis
Emeritus
April 20th 2011


17626 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Oh and





Basically, Scar Symmetry will always get shit here. It's just how the site is.




Yeah totally that's why I reviewed both Symmetric In Design and Holographic Universe as 4's.

FenixZero
April 20th 2011


396 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

hahahahahahahahahaha

Hawks
April 20th 2011


87529 Comments


Cool story bro.

Lunarcheese
April 20th 2011


33 Comments


qwe3: You are a classic example of the elitist. I love that you went and gave a couple other SS albums shit ratings after reading what I said. I know you think you're hip and unique with this troll business, but stop it. You just look needy.

Crysis: Yes you did. And since then, you've lowered your rating of HU and have done nothing but badmouth the band. Obviously your opinion has changed so I don't see why you're using that as a defence. But i give you props for trying when it's not HerpADerpPankar95 or DisturbinglyOptimisticFanboyXfingTheSullen up at bat.

Fenix: Nifty

Hawks: I don't know why I'm bothering respond to you since anyone on this site with over 10k comments is indiscernible from one another, but I think a comment that brilliant deserves a "u mad?"


Hawks
April 20th 2011


87529 Comments


Lol.

Pankar95
April 20th 2011


175 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

>Yeah totally that's why I reviewed both Symmetric In Design and Holographic Universe as 4's.



He actually said that "they will always get shit" not "they have always been getting". And he is right. They are being flamed here while most reviews, comments and ratings in most other sites are generally very positive.

Pankar95
April 20th 2011


175 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Oh and wtf does HerpADerp mean?

TehInterWebz
April 20th 2011


37 Comments


NOOOOOO



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy