LOL, great review
|
| |
chan: quality of user wasn't a criteria for inclusion here, as evidenced by my feelings towards some mentioned.
|
| |
what pit said.
|
| |
Nick added usernames into his review seamlessly. It was much more forced here, but you still did a really good job.
|
| |
Great job.
|
| |
the relevance of this review blows my mind
|
| |
iai's actually referenced good users tho
:c
|
| |
i get some of this i think
|
| |
what was the other review like this that people are referencing?
|
| |
it's Iluvatar... it's in the recommended by reviewer, chances are many of the references will go over your head
|
| |
eric you sly dog
|
| |
yeah, read it, got about 4 references. this one, on the other hand, I can understand.
|
| |
that christian coffee shop lined sealed the deal, this is amazing. great stuff eric.
|
| |
sea don't bang cups doe
|
| |
it's no Iluvatar review.
|
| |
Ahhh I sea what you did there
|
| |
yeah but thats tough competition.
|
| |
nah I'm just being pseudo-butt hurt about being left out. I don't really actually care, but I'm never in any sort of feud, so I might as well pretend to be in one with Eric.
It does seem forced at times but it's still a pretty fun read.
|
| |
It's too bad a band named sputnik isn't good.
|
| |
Kind of fitting actually
|
| |
|