Album Rating: 5.0
ur rating needs to be UP
if you know what im sayinnnnnnnnnnnnnng
|
| |
...so I should get this right now?
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
you could say that
"that"
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
haha i used it to just make it clear that it being sort of punk and sort of pop does NOT MAKE IT POP PUNK
|
| |
stunning record
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
it's just indie[2]
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
yeah ive read and heard a few people say it is... not my sole source but check out the ridiculously complicated and pretty stupid pitchfork review of it.
|
| |
Pitchfork mentioned the word "punk" 12 times in that review.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
i want to post a review of this that is just alternating pictures of Propagandhi and that kid from nevershoutnever.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
time to abuse the staff blog
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
that's chans thang, not mine
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Yeah this is indie. Gonna give it one more chance before I delete it though.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Watermark has a kinda pop-punk vibe to it, although yeah they're indie
|
| |
Awesome review, awesome album
like this better than RS
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
we have established it is without genre guys
|
| |
puttin' me on a top users list one day, writing this the next, you couldn't be much higher in my book right now, knott-- love the concept here
though, I do love Reconstruction Site significantly more than this
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
significantly what
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
yeah simplistic means stupid. Now that Mr. Robertsona points it out that first sentence doesn't make too much sense. You have to add yourself as the subject dude.
Otherwise YES LEFT AND LEAVING
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
This album is boss, I always preferred Reconstruction Site though
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
yes yes yes
|
| |
|
|
