Album Rating: 3.5
It's true Ali, I prefer the zombie ep 10 fold to this CD.
I really should fix my ratings, I hate when people reference my ratings.
eh. I'm over it already, btw..Ali, while writing your name I wrote Alit about 17 times. Then it hit me, your new nick name is Aleet.
omfg I'm a genius
|
| |
Haha, I can go with that.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
Oh, yeah, of course Zombie is better than this. It has some (small amount of) substance.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Amazing review. Pos'd!
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Cool review dude and i share the sentiment that not every band is going to be a groundbreaking musical exploration and that sometimes it is just fun to listen to something a bit more straight ahead mosh along for the fun of it
|
| |
I love the Dan Seagrave cover art
|
| |
what
no
that like/enjoy thing is dumbbbbbbbb
|
| |
if you enjoy something you obviously like it, if you don't enjoy it i don't see how you can 'like' it. with the tool thing, i'm sure you can appreciate the music; the complexity or originality or whatever you think you are 'liking' but if you don't find it particularly enjoyable - you obviously don't like it. this is similar to the objective/subjective thing where people are "this music (or any other art form) is OBJECTIVELY bad, but i enjoy it a lot (subjectively)" or vice versa. i especially don't like when people say something like 'i don't like this album at all (subjectively) but it is 'objectively' deemed as the best thing ever therefore i will have to rate it 5/5'.
i definitely see where you are coming from cuz in my latest review i (apparently) talk about the negatives of the album too much and it makes it seem like i don't like the album but i actually do like the album for the most part. i just recognise its flaws, which do detract from overall enjoyment.
dunno why i just typed all that out when i summed it up perfectly in my last post LOL. prolly just procrastinating.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
Well, yeah, I guess the objective/subjective thing makes more sense.
|
| |
I had so much respect for you wyankeif up until you reviewed this. What happened??!!
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
It was one of my first screaming albums, and I like it in a similar way to how I like Hybrid Theory, if that makes any sense. And the only positive reviews for this album were absofuckinglutely terrible, I felt it deserved better.
|
| |
They were absofuckinglutely terrible because 15 year old fanboys who can't see past their bangs or their eyeliner wrote them. That's their fanbase, what did you expect?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
^^
danger: wildman
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
Well, yeah.
Rawr! screams Mike and the song is off the synth work...
About on the same level as brootalsamitch's Emmure review a while back. I was trying to convey that there is something here that can be enjoyed.
|
| |
"I KNOW A GHOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSST!!!"
NO, YOU FUCKING DON'T! I THOUGHT CHRISTIANS WEREN'T SUPPOSED TO LIE!!!
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
gotta admit though, the first 10 seconds of that song are kinda cool
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
He speaks the truth.
|
| |
A pretty good review, i don't know why everyone's complaining about the intro. I feel the same way about this album, but it does get old pretty fast.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
this would have been a better review if you used the word "cheesy" or some variation of it at least one more time
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
You have Plagues rated a 4.5.
js
|
| |
|
|
