Godspeed You! Black Emperor F♯ A♯ ∞
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
LepreCon
May 21st 2010


5481 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

For a site that absolutely adores this band I doubt there are many that would 'root for the underdog'

NeutralThunder12
May 21st 2010


8742 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

the opinions are stupid, he doesn't get the music and I straight up don't like him, but it isn't poorly written. But because his opinions just make no sense (which is my opinion), I wont pos him. But since it's not a 'bad' review, I won't neg either. I never even said it was superbly written, but it was a well-written review, despite ir being WRONG.

BallsToTheWall
May 21st 2010


51228 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

It is a Christianality theme, it is fictional, but no religion in the music, it is Okay, it is funny, do you need some coffee from a Christian coffee shop?

SeaAnemone
May 21st 2010


21429 Comments


[good grammar/semi-clear idea(singular)] -(unequal sign)- [well-written]

and LeperCon, it happens all the time.. whenever there's a review that uses good grammar and has some small sensible value
people that love to sound open-minded extol it as well-written.

BigHans
May 21st 2010


30959 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I think its well written, and Im the greatest writer of all time. In my house at least :P



Seriously though, its not SUPERB, but it is by no means poorly written, and doesnt deserve a neg IMO.

NeutralThunder12
May 21st 2010


8742 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

lol Eric

SeaAnemone
May 21st 2010


21429 Comments


let's just all agree that Balls has won this thread time and time again, ok?

FadeToBlack
May 21st 2010


11043 Comments


yeah Balls won this time /thread

Zettel
May 21st 2010


661 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Prophet:



Thanks for taking your time to respond. What can I say? I do not agree. I see resemblances to classical music, it hard not to see them, but the album falls behind its models. It is important to note this is not a post-rock discussion. I am not claiming there is better post-rock, or that they should stick to a given formula. Simply, the album is not good.

BallsToTheWall
May 21st 2010


51228 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMNry4PE93Y

NeutralThunder12
May 21st 2010


8742 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Zettel, shut the fuck up now. We get it. You like bad music. Alright.

Nagrarok
May 21st 2010


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

With all the discussion about this I'm getting eager to listen again, although I'm waiting for a stormy day for it to make the best impression.

Meatplow
May 21st 2010


5523 Comments


Prophet:

Thanks for taking your time to respond. What can I say? I do not agree. I see resemblances to classical music, it hard not to see them, but the album falls behind its models. It is important to note this is not a post-rock discussion. I am not claiming there is better post-rock, or that they should stick to a given formula. Simply, the album is not good.


Why not think of it in terms of ambient music rather than having to adhere to more traditional songwriting conventions?

FadeToBlack
May 21st 2010


11043 Comments


probably cause he doesn't 'get' ambient music

NeutralThunder12
May 21st 2010


8742 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

nah, cause he doesn't get how to 'not' suck weiner.

Zettel
May 21st 2010


661 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

"Why not think of it in terms of ambient music rather than more traditional songwriting conventions?"



I never thought of it in terms of songwriting conventions. These are not songs. Ambient music? There is better.



Parallels
May 21st 2010


10146 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

(THIS REVIEW)



[IMG]http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/ll281/sonicspeed500/1274412653771.jpg[/IMG]

Prophet178
May 21st 2010


6397 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I see resemblances to classical music, it hard not to see them, but the album falls behind its models




Simply, the album is not good.




But HOW? And WHY?



The main point I got out of this review and your comments is that the music amounts to nothing; there are no climaxes. What you have to realize is that was never the point. The composition flows between 24 movements that amount to a whole, each piece working off each other to fit into that whole. There are no climaxes because the music doesn't call for it. There are hills and valley within the grand scope of the piece, not just in each song like a typical band would do.



I still can't fathom how you can say this falls behind the model of classical compositions. It does everything right: it has a central theme that is modulated throughout the movements, the timbre is kept dark and bleak, each movement fits together and of course the harmony is impeccable.



Obviously I don't agree with your opinion, but what I'm trying to understand is why exactly you feel the way you do about the album.

FadeToBlack
May 21st 2010


11043 Comments


idk he probably wanted some 20 minute guitar solo at teh end or something :/

Nagrarok
May 21st 2010


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

This album definitely has climaxes.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy