well the rating is irrelevant if you can back it up, but you just say "I dont like it"

Album Rating: 2.0

pretty sure he said the execution was boring in the review... so

Album Rating: 4.0

There's 17 songs on the album, so you should at least be able to choose a few and explain why you disliked them so much. All your review said was "the album is bad". Explain yourself a lot more if you're gonna give this album such a low rating.

Album Rating: 5.0

The Art the War is shit compared to this. This is one of the greatest hip hop albums ever.

Album Rating: 2.0

The Art the War is shit compared to this. This is one of the greatly overrated hip hop albums ever.

Album Rating: 4.0

Meh, whatever. Review sucked, and you had no support for the rating.

Album Rating: 4.0

Don't care whether or not you like it or don't like it. You could take a shit on the album for all I care. I'm criticizing you on your shitty review. If this was your "best review" yet, then I suggest taking your time on the next one so you won't produce another piece of shit.

Album Rating: 4.0

dude nobodys criticizing you for disliking bone thugs n harmony

Album Rating: 4.0

Ever hear of a thesaurus? This is why you're a bad writer. Refrain from writing anymore if you honestly don't care about the review.

You're completely missing the point now

"dude nobodys criticizing you for disliking bone thugs n harmony"
^^^
this

I don't care if you give a classic album a 1, just elaborate on why you feel that way

Why are you encouraging people to neg when you spend so much of your time complaining to the mods about 'phantom negs' that aren't really phantom negs

The point is: your review is essentially 45% cleveland sports, 45% saying you don't like the album, and 10% conclusion. I'm all for nice/fun intro's, but you can't have an exceptionally long intro when the actual reviewing part of your review is so minute. Also, you don't back up your opinions well. I can understand why you don't like the album, but you give no variation in your descriptions, you need more elaboration. I'm not saying you did but reading this review makes me feel like you just listened to a couple of songs and made a quick passing judgement on the album as a whole. I'd just like you to spend a bit more time with an album, that's all. I'm not trying to be a smartass, i'm just trying to give you honest criticism. I know you like shorter and more concise reviews, but you still require more detail, especially when the semi related intro takes up so much space in this review.
Btw I didn't neg, I just never pos'd

"THIS IS BORING AND NOT EXECUTED WELL" is not elaborating

listen to Deviant he sums it up well

@ GlueyPorch I belive it's "ghost" negs not phantom but doesn't really matter does it?

Oh shit you're probably right, though i think i've heard people use the term phantom neg before. Btw i didn't read/neg this review.

'phantom negs' that aren't really phantom negs

lol @ Phantom

that's why it should be "ghost" negs

"Phantom" negs, so called because of Sputnik user Phantom's over-use of the negging function

But not this time, I am innocent.


Review could do with more expansion and reasoning for the low rating.

Although I don't disagree with this as much as your Beastie Boys review, if you give an album that's considered great a low score, you really need to work hard to validate your rating