Album Rating: 4.0
i have listened to SLF, can't remember what, but it didn't really hit me; haven't heard Crass tbh.
i think SP are incredibly powerful and literate, tho i can see why it sounds bogus for people outside the UK.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
oh, you should definitely get Feeding of the 5000 and Christ: the Album. the first is more punk, the second is more experimental.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
@stop shouting. ok i can understand why you like them, nut its vice verse for me w/sex pistols ans slf.
and im british by the way ;)
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
BODIES!!!!!!!!!! NOT AN ANIMAL!!!!!!!!!!
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
I was surprised to find out how bad this was. For such idols they sure couldn't make punk music worth a damn.
Also, the reviewer fails at punk. The appeal of punk is that it's unappealing. Rather than nice clean vocals and quality musicianship, you basically get a steaming pile of shit. Which this album wasn't even close to.
It's ironic how such a punk band was made by their image which was created by their manager.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
This isn't as horrid as some people make it out to be or as glorious as punk fans say it is.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Review comes off a bit uppity, but I really like your writing style. However, even if the album is inconsistent (which I agree) does it seriously deserve a 2? Can a piss poor album really be a classic?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
low ratings wow
I mean, nowhere near as good as public image but still
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
...this band is def better than anco and nirvana but whatever
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I've always said if you are not seriously knowledgeable about a subject you should be forbidden from having an opinion about it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
better than ramones
|
| |
agreed
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.3
Good review, although it kind of reads more in the 2.5-3 range.
|
| |
^I was gonna say literally exactly this.
|
| |
Check out that date.
It's a little late for that.
Sid Vicious is already dead
|
| |
|
|
